Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are you talking about? There is no broad based movement to ban Dr. Suess. There is no "the left" that you speak of.
Get your head out of the sand.
The ban is coming from Dr. Seuss Enterprises, not from any "liberal" group calling for it. I am a liberal and think it's silly. Feel better now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are you talking about? There is no broad based movement to ban Dr. Suess. There is no "the left" that you speak of.
Get your head out of the sand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember when the ACLU represented the rights of neo-Nazis to march in Skokie? I think the liberals had it right then and are getting it wrong now. Censorship through other means is still censorship.
That's where lots of liberals still are. I'm not personally bothered by plenty of what offends people, but I support their right to free speech, including calls for publishers to stop publishing books, and I support the free speech of publishers to pick and choose what they publish.
Anonymous wrote:Remember when the ACLU represented the rights of neo-Nazis to march in Skokie? I think the liberals had it right then and are getting it wrong now. Censorship through other means is still censorship.
Remember when the ACLU represented the rights of neo-Nazis to march in Skokie? I think the liberals had it right then and are getting it wrong now. Censorship through other means is still censorship.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is appalling to me that they are pulling some of Dr. Seuss’s classic children’s books off the shelves because they are potentially offensive. At what point does this cancel culture not become Fahrenheit 451?
I just re-read one of the titles being discontinued, “...Saw it on Mulberry St”, Dr. Seuss’s first children’s book and a wonderful story about imagination. The only potentially offensive line in the whole book is “a Chinese man that eats with sticks”. Is acknowledging that Chinese eat with chopsticks now so offensive that we are banning a book that mentions it? Can any Asians out there please enlighten me and tell me if you’re happy with the choice to remove this classic book from the shelves?
I’m really afraid of what’s going on, and that this kind of move is supported and applauded by the left.
Sure, you’re a liberal.
And it’s the company that owns the Seuss estate that has decided not to publish them anymore, because they’ve decided that the images look like racist caricatures. Is that okay with you, OP, that a private business is making business decisions? Or do you absolutely need to know there are racist images available for children to consume? “Liberal” my foot. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/02/books/dr-seuss-mulberry-street.html?action=click&algo=bandit-all-surfaces&block=trending_recirc&fellback=false&imp_id=611826861&impression_id=2a05d563-7b69-11eb-a011-4b3621e00654&index=3&pgtype=Article®ion=footer&req_id=511260386&surface=most-popular-story&variant=0_bandit-all-surfaces
Anonymous wrote:You're a "liberal Democrat" like I'm the Queen of Sheba. Primarily, you need to learn what exactly censorship is.
Anonymous wrote:I came to the US in the mid 80s, from communist China. People in the modern day have no conception of what it's like to experience the western culture for the first time, coming from a nearly perfect state of vacuum. Everything was new, vibrant, and amazing, including sliced bread and bologna.
Now throw on top of this, Dr Seuss books. It's like adding Mentos to a bottle of soda. I remember vividly pulling those books off the shelf at the local public library, which was mind blowing in and of itself. An air-conditioned building where everyone is polite and quiet, filled with books! A children's section, my gawd! What are these books, with cats, funny hats, strange words, what does it all mean?
Of all the books I read during those first few months of being in the US, the only ones I remember is my English text book, and Dr Seuss books. Maybe Dr Seuss books contain racially insensitive content, but to stop printing a volume because it talks about Chinese people using chopsticks? I imagine the 11-year-old me would have giggled at understanding that one reference, a moment of familiarity on and otherwise wild mental ride.
Anonymous wrote:Remember when the ACLU represented the rights of neo-Nazis to march in Skokie? I think the liberals had it right then and are getting it wrong now. Censorship through other means is still censorship.