Anonymous wrote:Hourly employees cannot accrue compensatory tme because to many cheap employers like you never allow them to take their compensatory time off. As you are so outraged about then you or your DH should quit our jobs and stay home and take care of your own children. Otherwise, shut up.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of you are invested in some sort of weird power-play that's probably the result of feeling under-appreciated at your own jobs. I have had the same nanny for going on 6 years. I never have to worry that my child is in good hands. That's how I feel like I "won", not because I withheld pay on a snow day or paid for too many vacation days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work at a place that has a lot of hourly workers, and they are in no way interchangeable. Nannying is an important skilled job, but there are many important skilled jobs that are hourly.
At my workplace, if we close when you’re scheduled to work, you get paid. If we are open and you don’t show up, you don’t get paid. Snow days are a bit of a gray area because it’s the family that’s deciding if they’re “open” or not. That relies on you to be sensible and humane. But when you offered safe transportation, assuming it really was safe, the nanny should have either, or not been paid
Yeah, I don't get why this person is so invested in hourly jobs generally involving interchangeable employees. There are plenty of hourly jobs that require employees to not just have specific skills, but also knowledge of workplace logistics, procedures, and even personalities, such that someone who technically has the skills but lacks the specific experience in that workplace can't just smoothly step in. It's really not helping her case.
There are very few hourly jobs in a workplace that won’t allow one worker to exchange shifts with another worker. Most nannies can’t do that, as they’re the only one, and they are integral to the household functioning during the week.
Anonymous wrote:PS how many employers posting here would take a job that involves being paid only when you are needed and that is at the employer's discretion? If you get paid 4 digits a year maybe. If you get paid 2 digits a year no can do.
Anonymous wrote:I will preface this saying I do not have a nanny, but here are my thoughts. If she misses a day of work due to snow, why would you pay her for that day? It seems to me, she should either use a vacation day or take it unpaid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL at the delusional nanny who thinks she is less replaceable than an ER physician. Nannies are unskilled labor.
I don’t know what comment you’re “lol” ing about but do you really think there is no skill involved in being a nanny? No talent? Truly anyone - male, female, young, old - can do it? Do you think college degrees in Early Childhood education are ridiculous and worthless?
I’m honestly asking. You post here a lot with such contempt for nannies that I’m curious as to the extent.
+1. I’m curious, too. So much contempt for nannies.
Anonymous wrote:For the record we pay our nanny very well and do all these things. I just get frustrated when at times (like the huge snow storm where nanny can’t make it in and then refuses to come in again the next day despite being offered safe transportation here) that I’m always supposed to pay her no matter what but also supposed to pay for every minute over our schedule on a given day.
Hourly employees generally have the benefit of overtime pay and being paid for every minute worked. The drawback is they don’t get a lot of paid vacation, generally don’t get paid for time they don’t work, and can be subject to schedule changes.
Salaried employees get the benefit of paid vacation and paid holidays. They get paid whether or not they’re able to show up and do their job. The drawback is they don’t get paid extra for every minute they work over their regular schedule in a given day.
My husbands job is one and mine is the other. It feels like nannies get both. And yes I’m partially just frustrated at the moment that dh wasn’t able to do his job and therefore wasn’t paid bc our nanny wouldn’t come in with provided transportation or stay overnight to prevent this problem (she doesn’t have kids or pets) but we still have to pay her. I in no way think nannies should be poorly paid or paid off the books or nickled and dimed, but I also don’t think they have some special status that elevates things above literally all over workers at regular companies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL at the delusional nanny who thinks she is less replaceable than an ER physician. Nannies are unskilled labor.
I don’t know what comment you’re “lol” ing about but do you really think there is no skill involved in being a nanny? No talent? Truly anyone - male, female, young, old - can do it? Do you think college degrees in Early Childhood education are ridiculous and worthless?
I’m honestly asking. You post here a lot with such contempt for nannies that I’m curious as to the extent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the record we pay our nanny very well and do all these things. I just get frustrated when at times (like the huge snow storm where nanny can’t make it in and then refuses to come in again the next day despite being offered safe transportation here) that I’m always supposed to pay her no matter what but also supposed to pay for every minute over our schedule on a given day.
Hourly employees generally have the benefit of overtime pay and being paid for every minute worked. The drawback is they don’t get a lot of paid vacation, generally don’t get paid for time they don’t work, and can be subject to schedule changes.
Salaried employees get the benefit of paid vacation and paid holidays. They get paid whether or not they’re able to show up and do their job. The drawback is they don’t get paid extra for every minute they work over their regular schedule in a given day.
My husbands job is one and mine is the other. It feels like nannies get both. And yes I’m partially just frustrated at the moment that dh wasn’t able to do his job and therefore wasn’t paid bc our nanny wouldn’t come in with provided transportation or stay overnight to prevent this problem (she doesn’t have kids or pets) but we still have to pay her. I in no way think nannies should be poorly paid or paid off the books or nickled and dimed, but I also don’t think they have some special status that elevates things above literally all over workers at regular companies.
I agree they can’t have it both ways. In theory, you should not pay her for today and tomorrow if she refused to come in. In real life, it’s hard to do this when you worry the nanny will most likely get resentful of the docked pay. The parents prepaid a distance learning pod supervisor for the week. She didn’t show up today citing snow. But I doubt the pod parents will dock her the $420 for today.
The thing is you’re kind of creating an incentive not to work. If they know they’ll be paid for the snow day regardless, then suddenly they feel “scared” to drive. Ever since we started paying for snow days, our nanny suddenly can’t come to work any time that it happens to be snowing. Before we started covering the snow days, she somehow figured out how to get to work for them because she wanted to be paid.
Anonymous wrote:LOL at the delusional nanny who thinks she is less replaceable than an ER physician. Nannies are unskilled labor.