Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much vitriol! I have been accused of not loving my kids, buying luxury cars, being too stupid to have received merit aid myself and more. Just so many baseless assumptions.
Thank you to those who offered more nuanced thoughts.
To be clear, I "accused" you of NOT buying the luxury car. The colleges that offer merit money to strong students are the less selective, less prestigious schools. Most of those are fine choices, as are the schools that don't offer merit, for those who want to pay for that status. As I said, no judgment either way. I'm puzzled that you took offense.
Anonymous wrote:So much vitriol! I have been accused of not loving my kids, buying luxury cars, being too stupid to have received merit aid myself and more. Just so many baseless assumptions.
Thank you to those who offered more nuanced thoughts.
Anonymous wrote:This is all a joke. US college is simply too much money, for too little return. The debt is crushing. Something's gotta give.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing is wrong with any of these opinions or options. Every family has to do what makes sense for them. Spoiler alert: it will all work out if the kids develop their own ambitions.
Anonymous wrote:So I was a first generation college student. I worked really hard in HS and got decent scholarships for college. I primarily had merit-based aid, with a small amount of need-based aid and then student loans. I went to an expensive school. Costs worked out roughly as such:
40-45 k total
25 merit-based aid
5k need-based aid (Pell grant)
2k work study
10k student loans
I worked a lot in college and took out loans. It took me about 10 years to pay back the 40k and it never felt particularly onerous. I went to grad school via a program that paid for my degree entirely.
In my husbands case he had a full ride to a comparable school for tuition and his parents paid 10k/year for his room/board. He also has advanced degrees but did a combined ba/ma program and transferred in with a lot of credits so it ended up not costing much extra.
Our child is young but very bright and I believe she will be similarly high-performing in high school. We make more money than my family did, certainly, but we don't have dedicated college savings. I guess I am expecting my child to get a lot of merit-based aid and then figure we will be fine paying the rest.
I don't get why we would save 300k or whatever when I fully expect her to get merit aid. And if somehow she fizzles out and doesn't get merit-aid, then I would expect her to go to a cheaper school.
Am I missing something?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:okay? DH and I were excellent students (I had a 1540 SAT and straight As)... no college aid whatsoever. My parents made too much (150k). My instate school was 15k a year and out of state schools were 45k a year. My parents paid it all though.
DH had 75-80k in student loans. We lived in a den (no closet and 4 other roommates) for several years to pay them off and save for a downpayment. It was doable, but if we both had that much, we wouldn't have been able to pay them off. As it was, it pushed our children back into our 30s since we didn't want student loan debt and daycare.
1540 wasn’t on the two-section test though with the new SAT, right?
Anonymous wrote:okay? DH and I were excellent students (I had a 1540 SAT and straight As)... no college aid whatsoever. My parents made too much (150k). My instate school was 15k a year and out of state schools were 45k a year. My parents paid it all though.
DH had 75-80k in student loans. We lived in a den (no closet and 4 other roommates) for several years to pay them off and save for a downpayment. It was doable, but if we both had that much, we wouldn't have been able to pay them off. As it was, it pushed our children back into our 30s since we didn't want student loan debt and daycare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You’re going to get flamed for your opinion here but I agree with you.
Same! I don’t see how spoon-feeding children does anyone good.