Anonymous wrote:I would have a fall back plan if the caretaker can't come back after the week.
Reading all of this, sounds like baby will be just fine. But back injuries can be fickle and I would have a back up plan of what will happen if a week passes and the caretaker isn't better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd be taking baby with me too. Newborns need antibodies. If your baby has a fever and is <3 months old, they are supposed to go to the NICU. You should not be traveling. The safest way to travel is to at least give baby your antibodies.
What if the baby was exclusively formula-fed?
I wouldnt leave a baby that young even if I didnt breatfeed! I would bring baby or find another solution. I cant believe her siblings wouldnt step up. And yes my dh had to fly to see his sick mom and he was fine! Mom was fine too.
Op wants to do what she wants but when you ask others you have to be prepared to hear things you dont want to hear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd be taking baby with me too. Newborns need antibodies. If your baby has a fever and is <3 months old, they are supposed to go to the NICU. You should not be traveling. The safest way to travel is to at least give baby your antibodies.
What if the baby was exclusively formula-fed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At 8 weeks I would not do this. If YOU needed life-saving surgery I would do it, otherwise no. If somebody is dying, they are going to die. Your baby's life has JUST started. They don't have vaccines, they only have the immunity they got from being inside your baby and maybe if you've been nursing. Somebody else can help with the family emergency. You have to prioritize your newborn.
Sorry. I know this sounds harsh and isn't what you want to hear. But it's absolutely what I would do.
I agree with the PP. At eight weeks I’m bringing baby with me, and if it’s an emergency that can’t be handled with a baby in tow, then I am not equipped to help either. Unless one of my other children were in dire circumstances I can’t imagine it.
I agree. The baby would be coming with me, no question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d hire a babysitter or get a family member to help your DH. The same as what I would have wanted if my DH had to leave for a week!
OP here. Why? My husband is capable of caring for his child. He is a grown man, not a child. Why do you feel men can't care for their own kids without a babysitter? He is very capable of handling our son for a week.
Does he lactate, too?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d hire a babysitter or get a family member to help your DH. The same as what I would have wanted if my DH had to leave for a week!
OP here. Why? My husband is capable of caring for his child. He is a grown man, not a child. Why do you feel men can't care for their own kids without a babysitter? He is very capable of handling our son for a week.
Anonymous wrote:Are you willing to give up breastfeeding and possibly have your baby not recognize you when you get back?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does he already do with the baby? Does the baby already take a bottle? How many weeks old is the baby? How many days before you go on your trip?
OP here. He is 8 weeks old. He does almost everything. He is on paternity leave still. He feeds, changes, burps, plays, and puts him to sleep. He is combo fed and takes a bottle. I will be gone for a week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At 8 weeks I would not do this. If YOU needed life-saving surgery I would do it, otherwise no. If somebody is dying, they are going to die. Your baby's life has JUST started. They don't have vaccines, they only have the immunity they got from being inside your baby and maybe if you've been nursing. Somebody else can help with the family emergency. You have to prioritize your newborn.
Sorry. I know this sounds harsh and isn't what you want to hear. But it's absolutely what I would do.
I agree with the PP. At eight weeks I’m bringing baby with me, and if it’s an emergency that can’t be handled with a baby in tow, then I am not equipped to help either. Unless one of my other children were in dire circumstances I can’t imagine it.
I agree. The baby would be coming with me, no question.
The baby would prefer to stay in her routine, engaging and learning with her loving and capable dad!! Bringing the baby would only benefit the mother.
That said, pumping sucks so I'd much prefer to have the baby with me for that reason. But don't guilt trip this woman for absolutely no good reason.
The baby would prefer to stay with it’s mother. But babies don’t think like that (of course.) This is not a dire enough emergency in my book, and it does seem like you could all travel there together. You are driving and dad is on leave, right?
OP here. My dad lives in a very small house and there isn't room for all of us. It is important I go because my dad has health issues and can't risk him getting exposed to anything. My other siblings will have to fly and that is not possible. I'm the only option. My husband is capable of caring for his child for one week.