Anonymous wrote:Blackwolf model is not helping its players who hope to play in college. Now it is all about film and playing best teams possible, not practices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about black wolf?
Different kind of program than the others. Clinics and lessons.
They did play tournaments this fall
Their philosophy is to play very few tournaments compared to the other programs mentioned earlier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about black wolf?
Different kind of program than the others. Clinics and lessons.
They did play tournaments this fall
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about black wolf?
Different kind of program than the others. Clinics and lessons.
They did play tournaments this fall
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about black wolf?
Different kind of program than the others. Clinics and lessons.
Anonymous wrote:What about black wolf?
Anonymous wrote:The answer here is pretty obvious. If ML, NL or DCE could field an on-age team with enough talent and depth to do this without opening it up in this format, they would, but ML has at least 3-4 which is why they had their thing, and NL, DCE and VLC are doing theirs. The hold-back thing just creates two separate cultures in club lax. Girls lax doesn't have it, but instead its more of a money game. Boys its will you hold your kid back for fractional and fleeting help in high school as it all evens out by the time they get to college aged. Sure this could be a move to enrich those clubs hosting the tryouts with additional talent, but i think you have to take them at their word that they just dont want to keep losing to LI teams by running the same old playbook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Not all teams. My sons team is all on age and a top two or three team in DMV
Which team is that?
Hammers