Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's really my question. Her politics, etc, are a larger discussion, but her demeanor is so aggressive.

Funny, if she was a Democrat, you’d call that kind of accusation “misogynist”. Remember, women don’t have to be “nice” all the time - or does that only apply to liberal women?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought liberals didn't slap down women.

So does misogyny only apply to conservative females?

No one is slapping her down because she's a woman, for heaven's sake. They're slapping her down because she is actively playing a role in undermining our democracy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's really hard to steel yourself to lie 24/7. Most people can't do it, even if paid to do so. Not only have Trump's press secretaries had to lie like everyone in his Cabinet, but they've had to explain, argue and defend their lies. It's an impossible task, and explains the high turnover at the post, as well as the emotions. They are angry and afraid that if they don't lie convincingly enough, their boss will be angry (and his anger is apparently very unpleasant).

Not a healthy job AT ALL, physically, and psychologically.

It still blows my mind that she’s a new mom and just left her kid back in Florida.

Our baby is the same age. I can’t imagine being so angry and lying everyday for living, while not seeing our kid daily. I think the only way she can do the job is if her kid is kept far away from DC. I’m convinced she has a chemical imbalance.

And yet, if she was a Democrat, you’d be crowing about how she “has it all” and anyone criticizing her work/life balance would be immediately labeled a misogynist. Wow, this is almost too easy.

You've got nothing PP. Just give it up. Your "and yet if she were a Democrat" is stupid, no matter how much you use it.

R's are attracted to massive bitches, apparently. I think it's accurate to call Sean Spicer a massive bitch, too.

I think it’s accurate to call you a massive bitch. And it’ll be so interesting to hear your outrage the next time a Democratic woman is attacked. Bookmarking all of these posts.

Anonymous wrote:I thought liberals didn't slap down women.

So does misogyny only apply to conservative females?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's really hard to steel yourself to lie 24/7. Most people can't do it, even if paid to do so. Not only have Trump's press secretaries had to lie like everyone in his Cabinet, but they've had to explain, argue and defend their lies. It's an impossible task, and explains the high turnover at the post, as well as the emotions. They are angry and afraid that if they don't lie convincingly enough, their boss will be angry (and his anger is apparently very unpleasant).

Not a healthy job AT ALL, physically, and psychologically.

It still blows my mind that she’s a new mom and just left her kid back in Florida.

Our baby is the same age. I can’t imagine being so angry and lying everyday for living, while not seeing our kid daily. I think the only way she can do the job is if her kid is kept far away from DC. I’m convinced she has a chemical imbalance.

And yet, if she was a Democrat, you’d be crowing about how she “has it all” and anyone criticizing her work/life balance would be immediately labeled a misogynist. Wow, this is almost too easy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because when there is no substance to what you're saying the only way to seem "right" is to be aggressive and angry.

If you lie with conviction many people buy the lie more easily.

It's really as simple as, a hit dog will holler.

Yep, I am going with the hit dog will holler rationale here as this aggressive and angry comportment is common in this admin, especially Pompeo. Or my teens when they get caught in something.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's really hard to steel yourself to lie 24/7. Most people can't do it, even if paid to do so. Not only have Trump's press secretaries had to lie like everyone in his Cabinet, but they've had to explain, argue and defend their lies. It's an impossible task, and explains the high turnover at the post, as well as the emotions. They are angry and afraid that if they don't lie convincingly enough, their boss will be angry (and his anger is apparently very unpleasant).

Not a healthy job AT ALL, physically, and psychologically.

It still blows my mind that she’s a new mom and just left her kid back in Florida.

Our baby is the same age. I can’t imagine being so angry and lying everyday for living, while not seeing our kid daily. I think the only way she can do the job is if her kid is kept far away from DC. I’m convinced she has a chemical imbalance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know but to me, she was asked to do a job and she obviously is doing a great job, considering the circumstances of the job. She seems very prepared and quick on her feet. I would hire her once she leaves this position. Set her to task and I am sure she would kill it in the private sector.

What she is doing is wholly unrelated to the actual job. Quite the opposite. It would be like, you hire someone to style your grandmother's hair for an elegant evening and they give her a mohawk.

Anonymous wrote:That's really my question. Her politics, etc, are a larger discussion, but her demeanor is so aggressive.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know but to me, she was asked to do a job and she obviously is doing a great job, considering the circumstances of the job. She seems very prepared and quick on her feet. I would hire her once she leaves this position. Set her to task and I am sure she would kill it in the private sector.

Did she seem prepared and quick on her feet when she was so lacking in answers to very simple questions that Fox News, of all things, cut away from her?

Hey, everyone has a choice. Listen or not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know but to me, she was asked to do a job and she obviously is doing a great job, considering the circumstances of the job. She seems very prepared and quick on her feet. I would hire her once she leaves this position. Set her to task and I am sure she would kill it in the private sector.

I know it's hard to remember but it's actually not the job of the press secretary to attack people, to attack journalists or be aggressive. The press secretary is supposed to communicate, which can often include rapport. Usually does not include insults. Rarely includes constant lying.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know but to me, she was asked to do a job and she obviously is doing a great job, considering the circumstances of the job. She seems very prepared and quick on her feet. I would hire her once she leaves this position. Set her to task and I am sure she would kill it in the private sector.

Anonymous wrote:It's probably dawning on some of these people that they've been involved in a criminal enterprise that is unraveling, and they could soon be facing criminal investigations and charges. I don't know about Kayleigh in particular, but it could explain some things.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know but to me, she was asked to do a job and she obviously is doing a great job, considering the circumstances of the job. She seems very prepared and quick on her feet. I would hire her once she leaves this position. Set her to task and I am sure she would kill it in the private sector.

I know it's hard to remember but it's actually not the job of the press secretary to attack people, to attack journalists or be aggressive. The press secretary is supposed to communicate, which can often include rapport. Usually does not include insults. Rarely includes constant lying.

I agree, but when you have disingenuous reporters trying to play gotcha and going after the press secretary, its hard not to go on the offensive. Especially when it is painfully obvious there is an agenda on the reporters side. After a while, I am sure you can agree, once you get pushed and pushed and pushed, you push back.