Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have several FSOs in our neighborhood and my spouse used to work at State in a support capacity. Yes, they are full of themselves. To be fair, the ones I know are actually smart and educated, but also rude and just not interested in talking about anything besides their jobs. They all hang out together, rent homes from one another, etc -- very insular -- and if you get two in a room they only talk about who else in State they both mutually know.
I'm in the Foreign Service and take offense at many of the characterizations being levied here (I don't think I'm full of myself and have never rented to or from a fellow DOS employee)- but the bit about getting two in a room and it becoming a "who you know" contest is too funny- and true!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have several FSOs in our neighborhood and my spouse used to work at State in a support capacity. Yes, they are full of themselves. To be fair, the ones I know are actually smart and educated, but also rude and just not interested in talking about anything besides their jobs. They all hang out together, rent homes from one another, etc -- very insular -- and if you get two in a room they only talk about who else in State they both mutually know.
FSO here. I think this is somewhat true of some FSOs but I also think it varies by cone and people who have come in over the last 10-12 years are really changing the culture for the better. Please keep an open mind. You will find great people who care about you, what you do and what you offer.
Anonymous wrote:We have several FSOs in our neighborhood and my spouse used to work at State in a support capacity. Yes, they are full of themselves. To be fair, the ones I know are actually smart and educated, but also rude and just not interested in talking about anything besides their jobs. They all hang out together, rent homes from one another, etc -- very insular -- and if you get two in a room they only talk about who else in State they both mutually know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way to generalize. On second thought, I do iit too. For example, I can’t stand most lawyers. They think they’re smarter than everyone and that completing law school is some huge intellectual feat.
As a lawyer in another agency who sometimes deals with State lawyers, I hope you realize that most of them went to top law schools and did very well. I'd wager it's far, far harder to get a legal job at State than become an FSO.
This is unquestionably true. FSOs are a dime a dozen. Being a lawyer with State is far more impressive.
Yes, and those lawyers are totally insufferable, in my experience!
I think both of these statements are true. FSOs are insufferable. So are L lawyers. They deserve each other. The taxpayers deserve better.
You sound lovely. I wonder how many L lawyers you've actually met/dealt with. If you think they're insufferable and work with them in a professional capacity, you're probably one of the fools who thinks L cramps their style because they actually, gasp, care about the law and ensuring the accuracy of Department products. Luckily for me, your boss or your boss's boss usually cares and I can just go over your head when I need to.
I’m actually inside L and probably work with you. The snob factor lives here in L too. I think L and FSOs could both se a huge injection of humility.
Of course there are snobs in L. There are snobs everywhere. But do you really think L is snottier than the average population? I don't at all. Certainly not the average similarly situated population (e.g., DC lawyers or State Department employees in general)? I don't at all. I think L folks have gotten more aggressive in this admin because we're so used to the political folks trying to steamroll us/cut us out of the process, but I don't think that's snootiness. I think most folks in L think the law genuinely matters and cares whether State and State products reflect it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any civilian workplace where everyone's called an officer is asking for trouble.
+1
BINGO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way to generalize. On second thought, I do iit too. For example, I can’t stand most lawyers. They think they’re smarter than everyone and that completing law school is some huge intellectual feat.
As a lawyer in another agency who sometimes deals with State lawyers, I hope you realize that most of them went to top law schools and did very well. I'd wager it's far, far harder to get a legal job at State than become an FSO.
This is unquestionably true. FSOs are a dime a dozen. Being a lawyer with State is far more impressive.
Yes, and those lawyers are totally insufferable, in my experience!
I think both of these statements are true. FSOs are insufferable. So are L lawyers. They deserve each other. The taxpayers deserve better.
You sound lovely. I wonder how many L lawyers you've actually met/dealt with. If you think they're insufferable and work with them in a professional capacity, you're probably one of the fools who thinks L cramps their style because they actually, gasp, care about the law and ensuring the accuracy of Department products. Luckily for me, your boss or your boss's boss usually cares and I can just go over your head when I need to.
I’m actually inside L and probably work with you. The snob factor lives here in L too. I think L and FSOs could both se a huge injection of humility.
Anonymous wrote:As the wife of an FSO, this thread has been so amusing to me! Especially the part about the furniture, LOL
Anonymous wrote:Any civilian workplace where everyone's called an officer is asking for trouble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way to generalize. On second thought, I do iit too. For example, I can’t stand most lawyers. They think they’re smarter than everyone and that completing law school is some huge intellectual feat.
As a lawyer in another agency who sometimes deals with State lawyers, I hope you realize that most of them went to top law schools and did very well. I'd wager it's far, far harder to get a legal job at State than become an FSO.
This is unquestionably true. FSOs are a dime a dozen. Being a lawyer with State is far more impressive.
Yes, and those lawyers are totally insufferable, in my experience!
I think both of these statements are true. FSOs are insufferable. So are L lawyers. They deserve each other. The taxpayers deserve better.
You sound lovely. I wonder how many L lawyers you've actually met/dealt with. If you think they're insufferable and work with them in a professional capacity, you're probably one of the fools who thinks L cramps their style because they actually, gasp, care about the law and ensuring the accuracy of Department products. Luckily for me, your boss or your boss's boss usually cares and I can just go over your head when I need to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way to generalize. On second thought, I do iit too. For example, I can’t stand most lawyers. They think they’re smarter than everyone and that completing law school is some huge intellectual feat.
As a lawyer in another agency who sometimes deals with State lawyers, I hope you realize that most of them went to top law schools and did very well. I'd wager it's far, far harder to get a legal job at State than become an FSO.
This is unquestionably true. FSOs are a dime a dozen. Being a lawyer with State is far more impressive.
Yes, and those lawyers are totally insufferable, in my experience!
I think both of these statements are true. FSOs are insufferable. So are L lawyers. They deserve each other. The taxpayers deserve better.
Wait, so you're saying State shouldn't hire top law school grads? What exactly do taxpayers deserve? And I thought taxpayers only concern about agency lawyers is that they have sound judgment...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way to generalize. On second thought, I do iit too. For example, I can’t stand most lawyers. They think they’re smarter than everyone and that completing law school is some huge intellectual feat.
As a lawyer in another agency who sometimes deals with State lawyers, I hope you realize that most of them went to top law schools and did very well. I'd wager it's far, far harder to get a legal job at State than become an FSO.
This is unquestionably true. FSOs are a dime a dozen. Being a lawyer with State is far more impressive.
Yes, and those lawyers are totally insufferable, in my experience!
I think both of these statements are true. FSOs are insufferable. So are L lawyers. They deserve each other. The taxpayers deserve better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Way to generalize. On second thought, I do iit too. For example, I can’t stand most lawyers. They think they’re smarter than everyone and that completing law school is some huge intellectual feat.
As a lawyer in another agency who sometimes deals with State lawyers, I hope you realize that most of them went to top law schools and did very well. I'd wager it's far, far harder to get a legal job at State than become an FSO.
This is unquestionably true. FSOs are a dime a dozen. Being a lawyer with State is far more impressive.
Yes, and those lawyers are totally insufferable, in my experience!
I think both of these statements are true. FSOs are insufferable. So are L lawyers. They deserve each other. The taxpayers deserve better.