Anonymous wrote:![]()
If you are an international student thinking about going to America, do you go to the college started by one of the founding fathers of USA, or some place near Detroit?
Anonymous wrote:^^ my image paste didn’t work, but you get the point.
Anonymous wrote:It's a personal opinion and I'd argue Gothic > Southern neoclassical
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UMich > UVA in national reputation, but the culture is different. If kids are looking for a more traditional, Southern vibe, they’d prefer UVA. Better campus too. I’d far prefer Michigan.
"better campus" is very subjective. I've visited both campuses and strongly prefer Michigan's (I have a bias toward really large campuses that I can explore and never get bored of)
Agreed. Both are nice, but I'll admit to a preference for Michigan's architecture over UVA's.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UMich > UVA in national reputation, but the culture is different. If kids are looking for a more traditional, Southern vibe, they’d prefer UVA. Better campus too. I’d far prefer Michigan.
"better campus" is very subjective. I've visited both campuses and strongly prefer Michigan's (I have a bias toward really large campuses that I can explore and never get bored of)
Anonymous wrote:The quality of education is the same at both.
Michigan is huge, awful weather, middle of the country, and too many obnoxious New Yorkers vs UVA is smaller, more conservative, better location.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If someone can pay in-state for U.V.A. Then of course that is a deal. Other than Berkeley + U.C.L.A. Most state schools are just that-- public schools for the masses
What do you mean by "other than Berkeley + UCLA" other schools are public schools for the masses? Let's compare...
UCLA: 31,500 undergrad enrollment; 68% in-state; 1400 avg SAT; 30.5 avg ACT; 3.9 GPA
Berkeley: 31,800 undergrad enrollment; 67% in-state; 1425 avg SAT; 31 avg ACT; 3.89 GPA
UMich: 31,300 undergrad enrollment; 51% in-state; 1435 avg SAT; 32.5 avg ACT; 3.88 GPA
UVA: 17,011 undergrad enrollment; 66% in-state; 1420 avg SAT; 32 avg ACT; 4.32 GPA
[Highestb]UNC[/b]: 19,400 undergrad enrollment; 81% in-state, 1385 avg SAT; 30 avg ACT; 4.39 GPA
In what state are the masses averaging these stats?
The Top 5 public schools are Top 5 for a reason. Not for the masses at all. Incredibly selective and competing with large national privates quite well.
UVA has the highest gpa, by a mile
UNC is higher. This has mostly to do with how the GPAs are calculated, which is not standardized. UNC has a higher reported GPA than all of the Ivy League schools in the Common Data Set.
UNC admits higher GPAs students quality higher
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If someone can pay in-state for U.V.A. Then of course that is a deal. Other than Berkeley + U.C.L.A. Most state schools are just that-- public schools for the masses
What do you mean by "other than Berkeley + UCLA" other schools are public schools for the masses? Let's compare...
UCLA: 31,500 undergrad enrollment; 68% in-state; 1400 avg SAT; 30.5 avg ACT; 3.9 GPA
Berkeley: 31,800 undergrad enrollment; 67% in-state; 1425 avg SAT; 31 avg ACT; 3.89 GPA
UMich: 31,300 undergrad enrollment; 51% in-state; 1435 avg SAT; 32.5 avg ACT; 3.88 GPA
UVA: 17,011 undergrad enrollment; 66% in-state; 1420 avg SAT; 32 avg ACT; 4.32 GPA
UNC: 19,400 undergrad enrollment; 81% in-state, 1385 avg SAT; 30 avg ACT; 4.39 GPA
In what state are the masses averaging these stats?
The Top 5 public schools are Top 5 for a reason. Not for the masses at all. Incredibly selective and competing with large national privates quite well.
Wow, check out UVA stats vs. UCLA. That's a beatdown. UVA higher SAT, ACT and GPA. Damn.
Definitely impressive. And defending NCAA basketball champions. (And men's lacrosse, if anyone cares about that.)