Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How would there be any problem with letting all teachers go back into their classrooms? Don't most of them have their own rooms? I don't understand why they'd need to restrict which teachers can come in.
High school teacher here. I share my classroom with 3 other teachers. No teacher in my building has their own room. We all share with at least one other teacher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you to Kevin Dougherty for his very thoughtful and articulate testimony. I haven't been able to watch the entire meeting, but have not heard one mention of even a consideration of reopening. The meeting seems entirely focused on how to do DL well. Has anyone heard any discussion of reopening - even just for special needs kids?
How about that? They are in week 2 of a new school year of systemwide distance learning, and the meeting has been focused on reporting on that.
Seems moot, though. What can the BoE do about what is already happening? They need to be focused on what happens next.
Really? The distance learning system is perfect, and there's nothing to improve?
Anonymous wrote:Exploring options for small group in-person instruction
Anonymous wrote:How would there be any problem with letting all teachers go back into their classrooms? Don't most of them have their own rooms? I don't understand why they'd need to restrict which teachers can come in.
Anonymous wrote:Teachers may gain access to buildings as of 9/14
Anonymous wrote:
You've got to be kidding me. The adoption of criteria that will be used to determine when schools can reopen isn't a significant change?
And, mind you, the Superintendent suggested they have their own criteria, or at least their own way of interpreting the state criteria. That's a decision that was apparently made in private, and the contents of that decision haven't been announced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you to Kevin Dougherty for his very thoughtful and articulate testimony. I haven't been able to watch the entire meeting, but have not heard one mention of even a consideration of reopening. The meeting seems entirely focused on how to do DL well. Has anyone heard any discussion of reopening - even just for special needs kids?
How about that? They are in week 2 of a new school year of systemwide distance learning, and the meeting has been focused on reporting on that.
Seems moot, though. What can the BoE do about what is already happening? They need to be focused on what happens next.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I stand by that statement.
Not addressing reopening in any meaningful way indicates two key points. First, that they're not prioritizing in-person instruction. And two, that the Superintendent doesn't really care what the BoE thinks, and isn't going to actively engage the Board with reopening decisions. Since the MCPS administration has already demonstrated they're beholden to the teachers with the ridiculous 45-day notice MOU, it seems quite likely that reopening won't happen unless an external force (namely, the BoE) puts pressure on the superintendent to do that. Letting the superintendent avoid that issue also indicates that the BoE is happy to be left out of that decision as well.
Why would you expect them to? They just voted at the end of last month on a plan based on
(1) the assumption of remote instruction through the first semester
(2) assessment in November about the second semester
(3) reassessment earlier if there are significant changes
Have there been any significant changes?
Yes, the state released metrics for reopening schools last week. They didn't mention that at all.
That's not a significant change.