Anonymous wrote:school friends? Hear me out. If you can afford $30-40k/yr for college I don’t know why people go to GMU, CUA, AU, Marymount, Howard, etc AND LIVE AT THEM. For that amount of money you could send your kid to a private with merit aid 3,000 miles away or an OOS public with merit. I know these are good schools but I thought one of the primary purposes of staying close was to save money by living at your house. I’m genuinely curious because it’s so odd to me. All of the people I know who’ve had their kids stay this close have money. My parents said no to “plane-ride” schools because of airfare and limited me to 2 hrs from home because they couldn’t understand directions. I was pissed! Why don’t kids want to explore a new place? Expand their horizons?
Anonymous wrote:There are so many college opportunities near DC. Just within the metro area we have some of the best schools in the country (JHU, Georgetown), a top ranked public (UMD), and some great LAC options. If you open it up to three hours away which is a pretty normal distance from home for most kids in the rest of the country (even ones going to their state school), you have hundreds of options including two ivies. We happen to live in the heart of higher education. I think a lot of kids find schools they love nearby without even considering location.
Anonymous wrote:PP. That said, some people just like to stay close. Most kids do. Mine are going far away because they want to explore. I agree that exploring is a good thing, but the plane angle is a small pain. I think many overestimate the cost, but there is some cost (plus summer storage)
Anonymous wrote:There's such an overblown emphasis on a kid immediately leaving home (by some method) as soon as they turn 18 in the United States. I know, I know. Plenty live at home for community college or to work, but it's usually looked upon with at least a slight veil of shame. It's ingrained in our culture to equate success with being fiercely independent. I would say this goes hand-in-hand with the prioritization of the nuclear family household. Many other parts of the world emphasis intergenerational households and living at home into adulthood (and not as a point of failure but rather an excellent option).
That being said, going to college close to home but still living in dorms seems like a great way to balance growing independence while also nurturing family life. I see nothing wrong with it. And I'm saying this as an American who stubbornly moved abroad for college the moment I graduated high school.
Anonymous wrote:school friends? Hear me out. If you can afford $30-40k/yr for college I don’t know why people go to GMU, CUA, AU, Marymount, Howard, etc AND LIVE AT THEM. For that amount of money you could send your kid to a private with merit aid 3,000 miles away or an OOS public with merit. I know these are good schools but I thought one of the primary purposes of staying close was to save money by living at your house. I’m genuinely curious because it’s so odd to me. All of the people I know who’ve had their kids stay this close have money. My parents said no to “plane-ride” schools because of airfare and limited me to 2 hrs from home because they couldn’t understand directions. I was pissed! Why don’t kids want to explore a new place? Expand their horizons?
Anonymous wrote:I went to college 7 miles from my home. I lived 21 miles from
Manhattan and majored in business and wanted to work in Wall Street. I worked at two major banks part time during college and got hired to a management training program on Wall Street fresh out of school.
If I lived in Peoria I would have still gone to school in NYC area
Anonymous wrote:Not everyone can get merit aid. Plane tickets are expensive during holidays.