Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a sad, mean-spirited thread. If I cared about impressing someone with my wealth, I'd probably wear big diamonds, drive a fancy car, or invite them to parties in my huge mansion. I certainly wouldn't bring another life into this world to show off to you.
We're middle class with three kids - public school (wouldn't choose private even if super rich), a couple vacations a year (one drive to beach, one fly somewhere), 4 bedroom house but older, not fancy. We'll be able to cover most of college, all if not one of the most expensive. They'll be mostly on their own for grad school.
We had our children because we love raising children. The dynamic of our family is so fun and each child brings their own personality, talents, ideas. If we won lotto, we'd probably have one more. Not to show off, but because we'd enjoy bringing another littler person into our lives.
if you can cover most of college at the most expensive privates for 3 kids you are not "middle class."
Anonymous wrote:What a sad, mean-spirited thread. If I cared about impressing someone with my wealth, I'd probably wear big diamonds, drive a fancy car, or invite them to parties in my huge mansion. I certainly wouldn't bring another life into this world to show off to you.
We're middle class with three kids - public school (wouldn't choose private even if super rich), a couple vacations a year (one drive to beach, one fly somewhere), 4 bedroom house but older, not fancy. We'll be able to cover most of college, all if not one of the most expensive. They'll be mostly on their own for grad school.
We had our children because we love raising children. The dynamic of our family is so fun and each child brings their own personality, talents, ideas. If we won lotto, we'd probably have one more. Not to show off, but because we'd enjoy bringing another littler person into our lives.
Anonymous wrote:What a sad, mean-spirited thread. If I cared about impressing someone with my wealth, I'd probably wear big diamonds, drive a fancy car, or invite them to parties in my huge mansion. I certainly wouldn't bring another life into this world to show off to you.
We're middle class with three kids - public school (wouldn't choose private even if super rich), a couple vacations a year (one drive to beach, one fly somewhere), 4 bedroom house but older, not fancy. We'll be able to cover most of college, all if not one of the most expensive. They'll be mostly on their own for grad school.
We had our children because we love raising children. The dynamic of our family is so fun and each child brings their own personality, talents, ideas. If we won lotto, we'd probably have one more. Not to show off, but because we'd enjoy bringing another littler person into our lives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like the wealthy law firm partner families have four or five kids, and the lower middle class or working class families. Regular middle class families have one or two.
This. Those with 4+ kids are on the opposite ends of SES spectrum.
+1. In Fairfax Co at least, families with 4+ kids are either really rich or really poor. Most of them claim to be middle class, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my area it’s a symbol of poor planning and overstretched exhausted mom.
I am sorry you couldn't have more kids. That must be hard for you to process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t know if it’s a status symbol but it’s definitely a rich person thing. We make ~700k and can only easily afford 3 and the type of lifestyle we want (nice house, private school, several vacations a year, 100% of college and grad school paid for, etc.).
This is a little out of touch.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed in my UMC area that having 4+ kids is the new status symbol, it’s mostly the wealthier families that do it and do t have to give a second though to providing college or paying for several kids at once in pricey camps or private school!
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know if it’s a status symbol but it’s definitely a rich person thing. We make ~700k and can only easily afford 3 and the type of lifestyle we want (nice house, private school, several vacations a year, 100% of college and grad school paid for, etc.).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like the wealthy law firm partner families have four or five kids, and the lower middle class or working class families. Regular middle class families have one or two.
This. Those with 4+ kids are on the opposite ends of SES spectrum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the mid-1900s 6-10 kids was common among Irish Catholic families. I don’t know if that is true today.
Many of the wealthy/educated Irish Catholics I know get started on kids/married later than they used to but spend their early 30s to early 40s having kids so end up with 4 or 5 kids. My good friend is Irish Catholic in nova. They got married in their early 30s and she had four kids, the last of which was born when she was 42.
I think kellyanne and Maria shriver fit in this group too.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know if it’s a status symbol but it’s definitely a rich person thing. We make ~700k and can only easily afford 3 and the type of lifestyle we want (nice house, private school, several vacations a year, 100% of college and grad school paid for, etc.).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like the wealthy law firm partner families have four or five kids, and the lower middle class or working class families. Regular middle class families have one or two.
This. Those with 4+ kids are on the opposite ends of SES spectrum.
Well, certain groups tend to be heavily represented at the two tails in big cities...for example in NYC Orthodox Jews (though it tends to be the Modern Orthodox among the wealthy and the Hasidic among the poor) and Catholics are heavily represented in the tails.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like the wealthy law firm partner families have four or five kids, and the lower middle class or working class families. Regular middle class families have one or two.
This. Those with 4+ kids are on the opposite ends of SES spectrum.
Well, certain groups tend to be heavily represented at the two tails in big cities...for example in NYC Orthodox Jews (though it tends to be the Modern Orthodox among the wealthy and the Hasidic among the poor) and Catholics are heavily represented in the tails.