Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you can have need blind schools ranked below Colby, you can even have need blind schools that are second or third tier - it is possible
Need blind and meet full need schools 2nd and 3rd tier? Would love a list, or even examples... thanks.
None. But on dcum “3rd tier” means “top 30 instead of top 5.” By that definition, my kid’s is about 4th/5th tier. And they are very pleased!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you can have need blind schools ranked below Colby, you can even have need blind schools that are second or third tier - it is possible
Need blind and meet full need schools 2nd and 3rd tier? Would love a list, or even examples... thanks.
Anonymous wrote:you can have need blind schools ranked below Colby, you can even have need blind schools that are second or third tier - it is possible
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am an alum of a selective SLAC, although not Amherst-tier. Let's say Colby-tier. I know first-hand that our need blind college is financially challenged, even with a strong endowment. If they need to send kids home this year, or if this pandemic continues to impact programming into the 2021-2022 academic year, I think need the blind policy might need to be re-evaluated, at least for waitlist candidates.
I know you are not saying otherwise, but Colby is not need blind. So if your college is need-blind, it is likely above "Colby tier" (which is a high tier indeed).
This sub-thread has spun off but the need-blind statements made were specifically about Amherst, and the endowment per student data was presented and linked to show that Amherst is unlikely to change that policy regardless of reduced enrollment for this year.
they never said Colby. I went to a SLAC that's top 10 according to us news, but not Amherst, so similar to Colby. We're need blind, but I know from friends both on the board and working there that there is a big concern that they won't be able to stay need bling. A lot of people are underestimating the damage covid is doing to budgets even of well endowed schools
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am an alum of a selective SLAC, although not Amherst-tier. Let's say Colby-tier. I know first-hand that our need blind college is financially challenged, even with a strong endowment. If they need to send kids home this year, or if this pandemic continues to impact programming into the 2021-2022 academic year, I think need the blind policy might need to be re-evaluated, at least for waitlist candidates.
I know you are not saying otherwise, but Colby is not need blind. So if your college is need-blind, it is likely above "Colby tier" (which is a high tier indeed).
This sub-thread has spun off but the need-blind statements made were specifically about Amherst, and the endowment per student data was presented and linked to show that Amherst is unlikely to change that policy regardless of reduced enrollment for this year.
Anonymous wrote:I am an alum of a selective SLAC, although not Amherst-tier. Let's say Colby-tier. I know first-hand that our need blind college is financially challenged, even with a strong endowment. If they need to send kids home this year, or if this pandemic continues to impact programming into the 2021-2022 academic year, I think need the blind policy might need to be re-evaluated, at least for waitlist candidates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So DD is coming from a Big 3 with ACT scores at the upper end of the range and grades in line with the average student. Apply ED and her odds are probably good, even better than normal for 2021.
Why do you say odds are better than normal for class of 2021?
Less revenue for the two school years in a row. Considering how generous aid is at Amherst, applicants with high stats who are paying full freight are more beneficial than usual.
For the millionth time, Amherst College is need blind in admissions, as are most top 20 schools. Full pay gives no advantage there.
With a top 10 Endowment per student of $1,157,046, they will make no changes to that policy.
https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/EndowmentPerStudent
But all of that (need-blind/financial aid/merit aid) is going to be in flux now due to COVID. Many SLACs are going to have to revamp their financial aid packages and/or dip into endowment to survive. My own SLAC is one of those listed as "will struggle". I've been hit up five times already for money. Granted my SLAC isn't Amherst but there will still be major changes coming due to the pandemic - much of it good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So DD is coming from a Big 3 with ACT scores at the upper end of the range and grades in line with the average student. Apply ED and her odds are probably good, even better than normal for 2021.
Why do you say odds are better than normal for class of 2021?
Less revenue for the two school years in a row. Considering how generous aid is at Amherst, applicants with high stats who are paying full freight are more beneficial than usual.
For the millionth time, Amherst College is need blind in admissions, as are most top 20 schools. Full pay gives no advantage there.
With a top 10 Endowment per student of $1,157,046, they will make no changes to that policy.
https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/EndowmentPerStudent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So DD is coming from a Big 3 with ACT scores at the upper end of the range and grades in line with the average student. Apply ED and her odds are probably good, even better than normal for 2021.
Why do you say odds are better than normal for class of 2021?
Less revenue for the two school years in a row. Considering how generous aid is at Amherst, applicants with high stats who are paying full freight are more beneficial than usual.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So DD is coming from a Big 3 with ACT scores at the upper end of the range and grades in line with the average student. Apply ED and her odds are probably good, even better than normal for 2021.
Why do you say odds are better than normal for class of 2021?
Anonymous wrote:You'd be much better served asking this question of your college counselor at your school and seeing the Naviance stats for similar applicants than asking on this forum. No one on this forum, present company included, knows anything about college admissions from your school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So PPs are saying that a 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from private is somehow worth more than 4.0 UW and 36 ACT from public? WTF?
Well, they have to justify the price they pay somehow.
The “Big 3” high schools have a more competitive admissions process than most colleges. Yes, being in the top 25% of the class is worth more there than being in the top 25% at a public school where a significant percentage of the student body isn’t aiming for college.
Whether or not going to a private school is actually helpful for college admissions is another matter — I actually think it isn’t these days, since it shows privilege that the schools are trying to steer away from. However, schools do adjust their perception of grades based upon the HS in question.
(FWIW, my kids don’t go to a Big 3)
LOL they admit kids in preschool. Notice I included STANDARDIZED test scores.
But someone has to be privileged at top private colleges because: a) they are expensive and b) they need to subsidized the nonprivileged.
Anonymous wrote:At LACs. Opposite is true at university engineering programs.