Anonymous wrote:I'm sitting right here with my coffee and nothing to do and nowhere to go because I'm in isolation until I get my stupid COVID negative.
Name the countries that have successfully reopened schools and I will look up their new cases per million per day.
(Don't say Israel because they aren't doing so well.)
Phase 3 — May 18
Classes at school will resume part-time and only for selected years, with a maximum of 10 pupils per classroom. All staff and kids older than 12 will be required to wear face masks. Children and staff should wash hands when entering school, when entering the class, after sneezing and after using a drinks or snacks distributor.
Education in Belgium is governed by the country's Flemish and Francophone language communities (both active in Brussels), which have significant discretion over how rules are applied. In true Belgian tradition, education networks (such as the Catholic or community networks) or individual schools have interpreted the rules differently when providing practical guidelines, making it even more complex for parents.
In Flanders, classes resume for the first, second and last (sixth) year of primary school and the last (sixth) year of secondary school. In the Francophone part of Belgium, only the last years of both primary and secondary schools will partially reopen May 18. The first and second year of primary school and the second year of secondary school may reopen May 25.
Kindergartens and nursery schools will stay closed, at least until the end of May.
Ever since the closing of the schools at the start of the lockdown, schools were obliged to offer daycare for kids whose parents work in a number of crucial professions. Although some schools have told parents that concerned only health care (or supermarket) workers, the official list is actually much broader, including (but not limited to) journalists and communication professionals, judges and lawyers, diplomats or staff of international institutions.
On May 18, daycare will be, in addition, accessible for children whose parents "don't have other options" to take care of their kids while they work. The problem is that if this very broad category is added to the kids who will resume their classes on the same date, it could become difficult for some schools (especially in big cities) to guarantee the strict social-distancing rules.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The way the numbers are trending in MoCo (latest 7-day average is under 4.5%, hospitalization way down from 1700 to less than 400), and continuing to improve every week, I'm really having a hard time to grasp why we open indoor dining, bars, etc and yet close schools. I'm with you OP. I hope Hogan overrides this.
If we want to have school, we need to close indoor dining and bars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maryland is yellow. The key metrics are declining - positivity rates, hospitalizations, ICUs, and deaths. Same with MoCo. That doesn't mean throw caution to the wind, but let's be intellectually honest.
But new cases per million per day is increasing. And Maryland is at 70 new cases per million per day. It's way too high. Germany is at 3.5 new cases per day.
There are many countries that opened up schools with numbers not at Germany level. You want to shut down everything until we reach Germany levels?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maryland is yellow. The key metrics are declining - positivity rates, hospitalizations, ICUs, and deaths. Same with MoCo. That doesn't mean throw caution to the wind, but let's be intellectually honest.
But new cases per million per day is increasing. And Maryland is at 70 new cases per million per day. It's way too high. Germany is at 3.5 new cases per day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But I am assuming most people in my situation who get tested but feel asymptomatic or not very ill and are waiting 7 days for a test aren't really isolating. It defies logic that they are. This is a reason we know that you need quick test results to reduce spread.
Yeah, but no one has an accurate rapid test. You could get the processing time down, but right now there is not an accurate rapid test on the market.
There's no test results within three hours? My friend with COVID symptoms went to a site where she had to wait and got a negative test within 3 hours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But I am assuming most people in my situation who get tested but feel asymptomatic or not very ill and are waiting 7 days for a test aren't really isolating. It defies logic that they are. This is a reason we know that you need quick test results to reduce spread.
Yeah, but no one has an accurate rapid test. You could get the processing time down, but right now there is not an accurate rapid test on the market.
Anonymous wrote:
You are tempted to go to the pool and shopping, but not so much to school. Got it.
Anonymous wrote:But I am assuming most people in my situation who get tested but feel asymptomatic or not very ill and are waiting 7 days for a test aren't really isolating. It defies logic that they are. This is a reason we know that you need quick test results to reduce spread.
Anonymous wrote:
You are tempted to go to the pool and shopping, but not so much to school. Got it.