Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:not selfish, but I don't think 2 is a "big" family either.
I think the people with 4+ kids are the selfish ones
Why? Having 4+ pretty much requires you to be selfLESS most of the time.
Because very few people have the financial resources to help 4+ kids pay for college, etc. Not to mention the fact that I don’t believe anyone has the time to give 4+ kids the attention they need to bring them up well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:not selfish, but I don't think 2 is a "big" family either.
I think the people with 4+ kids are the selfish ones
Why? Having 4+ pretty much requires you to be selfLESS most of the time.
Because very few people have the financial resources to help 4+ kids pay for college, etc. Not to mention the fact that I don’t believe anyone has the time to give 4+ kids the attention they need to bring them up well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:not selfish, but I don't think 2 is a "big" family either.
I think the people with 4+ kids are the selfish ones
Why? Having 4+ pretty much requires you to be selfLESS most of the time.
Anonymous wrote:not selfish, but I don't think 2 is a "big" family either.
I think the people with 4+ kids are the selfish ones
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3 is definitely the new two
Of course you should have the number of kids to reflect what is acceptable in your social circles, bleh. This type of thinking comes from someone with herd mentality, a sheep that follows the crowd and doesn't have an original bone or thought in their body.
Op do what you are comfortable with. One would be great. You have more time, energy and money for that child. I have a sibling who I don't talk to, we are not close at all. I am left to do all the elder care as well. Having more children doesn't guarantee you anything.
From what I can tell people with more kids like the chaos, noise and busyness of having more kids. If you get overwhelmed or stressed then one would be a better fit.
Of course later in life yes elder care falls onto that one child but you can plan for that and with more money outsource rather than depend solely on your child. Do what makes you happy.
I have heard that if the first is a great kid the second is usually the devil so be warned about that.
Anonymous wrote:3 is definitely the new two
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh. 2 kids? Just ugh.
What's that supposed to mean?
2 is the worst number. It's very middle middle class. UMC people have 1 or 3.
![]()
Np but I feel this way too. 2 just feels so safe and boring. I can’t explain it. I do feel like 2 is so middle class.
Anonymous wrote:Think about after you die. I know many brother sister combos that are super close. I think the child will want family when you are gone. Not everyone marries.