Anonymous wrote:The difference back then was that as a kid, I was pretty much allowed to go wherever I wanted. I just had to be home when the street lights came on.
So yeah, I didn’t need tv to entertain me - because I was given so much more freedom than kids are allowed today. I swam in the pool of one of my little old lady neighbors. I visited friends. I swam in the creek, wandered the woods and biked to a local bookstore.
Anonymous wrote:We had roller skates, jumpropes, hula hoops, a sandbox.
Anonymous wrote:I think there was a lot more parental neglect. Older kids probably did a lot of the childcare. Kids told to go off and play or do chores. No one worrying about whether they were getting too much screen time or falling behind in math or reading.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were beaten. Also, even from a very young age, many many kids worked, either on the family farm or in factories. As young as age 3 and 4, doing very simple tasks.
In the 50s????
Yes, who do you think picked crops? Particularly in the south and California
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I mean, in addition to the accurate "they mostly worked," or "they played with their 7 brothers and sisters," they weren't used to parents entertaining them or being entertained by a screen, so... they came up with their own entertainment. This was their expectation, so they acted accordingly.
It's not like people were (mostly) complaining of boredom all day every day before the invention of TV and computers.
Parents NEVER entertained their children. Parents read their own books. Once in a while a parent would play a board game but this would be rare.
Parents were parents. Kids were kids.