Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, it is the parents' job to educate and raise their children. School is a wonderful bonus in a first-world country. No school right now, so parents: do your *original* job!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So are parents reconsidering their overpriced housing purchases? When your kid goes to a public school, their district educates a very broad spectrum of students. Unless all of those students can receive an education, none of them will. If you don’t like it, move and spend your money on private schools. The reason they are already up and running is that they don’t have to honor IEPs and 504 plans. It costs money to opt out of the free version of education.
Record high private school applications this year for the above reason. Ironically, the private kids are the only ones being educated. MCPS is broken and is racing to the bottom.
I always wonder what people base these statements on. Is there some kind of public data clearinghouse for private-school applications?
In any case, when the economy crashes, everyone's coming back to MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my opinion, MCPS is being incredibly short-sighted by refusing to let any distance or on-line learning take place. I understand that access will be a problem for some students. However, by putting a stop to any learning of new material or feedback from teachers, or assesments of any kind, no child is served. Some parents who are lucky enough to have resources and time will provide lots of enrichment for their kids for as long as this lasts. They will find activities and make sure their kids stay on track academically. These kids will end up ahead of grade level. Some kids have parents that are still working, or are in difficult family situations without any adult support at home. These children will suffer with no support from MCPS. When they all come back, whenever that might be, I'm afraid that the achievement gap will be even bigger. For fear of looking inequitable, MCPS is harming more students than it would if it would just transition to online learning for whoever can access it and then try to help the folks that have trouble with access. Not to mention, the "work" that is online, at least for Elementary school, is complete dreck. Am I off base with this? I'm just disgusted by how MCPS is handling this. Everyone loses.
+100
I’m tired of MCPS using the achievement gap as an excuse to be mediocre and fail the vast majority of families they are supposed to be serving.
I'm tired of families taking less and less responsibility for raising their kids, and shifting that responsibility to MCPS and other school districts.
I'm tired of coronavirus, eh?
"Families! Stop doing stuff I think you shouldn't do, and start doing stuff I think you should do!" is just about as effective as "Coronavirus! Stop making people sick!"
DP
That’s simply not true.
The government has a good amount of control as to implementing incentives and changing behavior.
We currently have a system that ‘rewards’ women for having more kids, even when they can’t afford them. We have a system that has made families think that they can get free food/free clothes and other necessities from their kids’ schools, so why bother worrying about it.
Like it or not, our society has made some decisions that have led to even more and more people being comfortable with having kids that they cannot support. There are consequences to that, and it’s naive to ignore them.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, it is the parents' job to educate and raise their children. School is a wonderful bonus in a first-world country. No school right now, so parents: do your *original* job!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So are parents reconsidering their overpriced housing purchases? When your kid goes to a public school, their district educates a very broad spectrum of students. Unless all of those students can receive an education, none of them will. If you don’t like it, move and spend your money on private schools. The reason they are already up and running is that they don’t have to honor IEPs and 504 plans. It costs money to opt out of the free version of education.
Record high private school applications this year for the above reason. Ironically, the private kids are the only ones being educated. MCPS is broken and is racing to the bottom.
Anonymous wrote:So are parents reconsidering their overpriced housing purchases? When your kid goes to a public school, their district educates a very broad spectrum of students. Unless all of those students can receive an education, none of them will. If you don’t like it, move and spend your money on private schools. The reason they are already up and running is that they don’t have to honor IEPs and 504 plans. It costs money to opt out of the free version of education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If MCPS went forward with on-line instruction for say a month — in this example assume a 7th grade math reacher posts the lectures she would normally give, teachers are available to try to answer questions, and they figure out a way to give a test of the material. What should MCPS do when they re-open the schools? Not all students will have been able to participate in the on-line learning. So should the same material be taught again in the classroom?
Students that transfer from other school districts or countries get evaluated at the beginning of the year. We may have to do that for everyone next year. Students that are prepared, perhaps because they studied over the summer or continued with instruction somehow should NOT be penalized simply because others did not; those who can move forward should, and those who cannot move forward should not; they should be placed in the appropriate class no matter what. Whatever is done, it will be unfair to some; as a society I want the decision that is best for SOCIETY, not necessarily what is best for each and every individual. Society will be better off with at least SOME students continuing to learn NOW, rather than enacting a policy where NO STUDENT learns. Fair to all? No. Best for society? Most certainly.
The evaluation you are describing may work if there were no school for a year. But what if the school is closed for only one month or the rest of the academic year? Are you going to create extra classes to accommodate the students who had access to the internet and those who did not. What are your practical solutions to the problem the school would face?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my opinion, MCPS is being incredibly short-sighted by refusing to let any distance or on-line learning take place. I understand that access will be a problem for some students. However, by putting a stop to any learning of new material or feedback from teachers, or assesments of any kind, no child is served. Some parents who are lucky enough to have resources and time will provide lots of enrichment for their kids for as long as this lasts. They will find activities and make sure their kids stay on track academically. These kids will end up ahead of grade level. Some kids have parents that are still working, or are in difficult family situations without any adult support at home. These children will suffer with no support from MCPS. When they all come back, whenever that might be, I'm afraid that the achievement gap will be even bigger. For fear of looking inequitable, MCPS is harming more students than it would if it would just transition to online learning for whoever can access it and then try to help the folks that have trouble with access. Not to mention, the "work" that is online, at least for Elementary school, is complete dreck. Am I off base with this? I'm just disgusted by how MCPS is handling this. Everyone loses.
+100
I’m tired of MCPS using the achievement gap as an excuse to be mediocre and fail the vast majority of families they are supposed to be serving.
How the hell would you grade and assess kids who are unable to access the curriculum? Do you just hold them back end mass?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my opinion, MCPS is being incredibly short-sighted by refusing to let any distance or on-line learning take place. I understand that access will be a problem for some students. However, by putting a stop to any learning of new material or feedback from teachers, or assesments of any kind, no child is served. Some parents who are lucky enough to have resources and time will provide lots of enrichment for their kids for as long as this lasts. They will find activities and make sure their kids stay on track academically. These kids will end up ahead of grade level. Some kids have parents that are still working, or are in difficult family situations without any adult support at home. These children will suffer with no support from MCPS. When they all come back, whenever that might be, I'm afraid that the achievement gap will be even bigger. For fear of looking inequitable, MCPS is harming more students than it would if it would just transition to online learning for whoever can access it and then try to help the folks that have trouble with access. Not to mention, the "work" that is online, at least for Elementary school, is complete dreck. Am I off base with this? I'm just disgusted by how MCPS is handling this. Everyone loses.
+100
I’m tired of MCPS using the achievement gap as an excuse to be mediocre and fail the vast majority of families they are supposed to be serving.
I'm tired of families taking less and less responsibility for raising their kids, and shifting that responsibility to MCPS and other school districts.
I'm tired of coronavirus, eh?
"Families! Stop doing stuff I think you shouldn't do, and start doing stuff I think you should do!" is just about as effective as "Coronavirus! Stop making people sick!"
DP
That’s simply not true.
The government has a good amount of control as to implementing incentives and changing behavior.
We currently have a system that ‘rewards’ women for having more kids, even when they can’t afford them. We have a system that has made families think that they can get free food/free clothes and other necessities from their kids’ schools, so why bother worrying about it.
Like it or not, our society has made some decisions that have led to even more and more people being comfortable with having kids that they cannot support. There are consequences to that, and it’s naive to ignore them.