Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the dangers of second hand smoke are greatly overstated https://slate.com/technology/2017/02/secondhand-smoke-isnt-as-bad-as-we-thought.htmlAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: is there any state in the country that does this?
Yes. California, sort of. I think it depends on how many units are in the building. (Someone renting a one-unit or two-unit townhouse might not have the same legal requirements. But, in a 200 unit complex? Absolutely.) You also have to be at least 20 feet away from a building to smoke.
Honestly, if you want to make the Libertarian argument on smoking, go right ahead. But most Libertarians agree that once you start hurting other people, the law should step in.
Seriously? Slate is your source?
Look, my kid has asthma. Even walking through a cloud of cigarette smoke on the street can trigger an attack. Asthma is DEADLY. What the h*ll is wrong with you to even try argue this is ok?
If your kid is that sensitive, sounds like it's on you to live far away from cigarette smokers in a more controlled environment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the dangers of second hand smoke are greatly overstated https://slate.com/technology/2017/02/secondhand-smoke-isnt-as-bad-as-we-thought.htmlAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: is there any state in the country that does this?
Yes. California, sort of. I think it depends on how many units are in the building. (Someone renting a one-unit or two-unit townhouse might not have the same legal requirements. But, in a 200 unit complex? Absolutely.) You also have to be at least 20 feet away from a building to smoke.
Honestly, if you want to make the Libertarian argument on smoking, go right ahead. But most Libertarians agree that once you start hurting other people, the law should step in.
Seriously? Slate is your source?
Look, my kid has asthma. Even walking through a cloud of cigarette smoke on the street can trigger an attack. Asthma is DEADLY. What the h*ll is wrong with you to even try argue this is ok?
Anonymous wrote:slate is a liberal website . Here’s another one https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/passive-smoking-have-the-risks-been-overstated-1.1634815?mode=ampAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the dangers of second hand smoke are greatly overstated https://slate.com/technology/2017/02/secondhand-smoke-isnt-as-bad-as-we-thought.htmlAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: is there any state in the country that does this?
Yes. California, sort of. I think it depends on how many units are in the building. (Someone renting a one-unit or two-unit townhouse might not have the same legal requirements. But, in a 200 unit complex? Absolutely.) You also have to be at least 20 feet away from a building to smoke.
Honestly, if you want to make the Libertarian argument on smoking, go right ahead. But most Libertarians agree that once you start hurting other people, the law should step in.
Seriously? Slate is your source?
Look, my kid has asthma. Even walking through a cloud of cigarette smoke on the street can trigger an attack. Asthma is DEADLY. What the h*ll is wrong with you to even try argue this is ok?
Anonymous wrote:This should also include marijuana then.
If I have the right to breathe tobacco free air, I also have the right to breathe marijuana free air.
slate is a liberal website . Here’s another one https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/passive-smoking-have-the-risks-been-overstated-1.1634815?mode=ampAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the dangers of second hand smoke are greatly overstated https://slate.com/technology/2017/02/secondhand-smoke-isnt-as-bad-as-we-thought.htmlAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: is there any state in the country that does this?
Yes. California, sort of. I think it depends on how many units are in the building. (Someone renting a one-unit or two-unit townhouse might not have the same legal requirements. But, in a 200 unit complex? Absolutely.) You also have to be at least 20 feet away from a building to smoke.
Honestly, if you want to make the Libertarian argument on smoking, go right ahead. But most Libertarians agree that once you start hurting other people, the law should step in.
Seriously? Slate is your source?
Look, my kid has asthma. Even walking through a cloud of cigarette smoke on the street can trigger an attack. Asthma is DEADLY. What the h*ll is wrong with you to even try argue this is ok?
everywhere ? Why then do you oppose bars for smokers? You won’t be there yet you won’t allow itAnonymous wrote:This should also include marijuana then.
If I have the right to breathe tobacco free air, I also have the right to breathe marijuana free air.
Anonymous wrote:the dangers of second hand smoke are greatly overstated https://slate.com/technology/2017/02/secondhand-smoke-isnt-as-bad-as-we-thought.htmlAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: is there any state in the country that does this?
Yes. California, sort of. I think it depends on how many units are in the building. (Someone renting a one-unit or two-unit townhouse might not have the same legal requirements. But, in a 200 unit complex? Absolutely.) You also have to be at least 20 feet away from a building to smoke.
Honestly, if you want to make the Libertarian argument on smoking, go right ahead. But most Libertarians agree that once you start hurting other people, the law should step in.
the dangers of second hand smoke are greatly overstated https://slate.com/technology/2017/02/secondhand-smoke-isnt-as-bad-as-we-thought.htmlAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question: is there any state in the country that does this?
Yes. California, sort of. I think it depends on how many units are in the building. (Someone renting a one-unit or two-unit townhouse might not have the same legal requirements. But, in a 200 unit complex? Absolutely.) You also have to be at least 20 feet away from a building to smoke.
Honestly, if you want to make the Libertarian argument on smoking, go right ahead. But most Libertarians agree that once you start hurting other people, the law should step in.
Anonymous wrote:Serious question: is there any state in the country that does this?