Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:20 min = 5 pieces
X min = 10 pieces
40.
Takes him 2x as long for 2x the amount.
OP here. This was my first thought, and my kid's. But everyone who said 45 minutes is in fact correct. 5 minutes per chop and 9 chops to get 10 pieces.
Anonymous wrote:Double the work, double the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder of this is why I did miserably on the math SATs.
I can see why either 40 or 45 would be the right answer.
Explain how 40 could be the right answer?
Posted up thread, but 2x as long to do 2x as much work. 40 min.
Interesting how some people were focused on how many "cuts" while others saw it as production.
But it's not two times as much work. The work is the cutting. It's four cuts to get five pieces, and nine cuts to get 10 pieces. If the question was about carving something out of existing wood pieces, then it would be twice as much work to do twice as many pieces.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:20 min = 5 pieces
X min = 10 pieces
40.
Takes him 2x as long for 2x the amount.
OP here. This was my first thought, and my kid's. But everyone who said 45 minutes is in fact correct. 5 minutes per chop and 9 chops to get 10 pieces.
You cut 4 times to make 5 pieces, you don't cut 5 times. Are you fighting this? Because if you are, you're wrong.
I used to be super good at math but I guess my mind doesn't work that way anymore.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder of this is why I did miserably on the math SATs.
I can see why either 40 or 45 would be the right answer.
Explain how 40 could be the right answer?
Posted up thread, but 2x as long to do 2x as much work. 40 min.
Interesting how some people were focused on how many "cuts" while others saw it as production.
But it's not two times as much work. The work is the cutting. It's four cuts to get five pieces, and nine cuts to get 10 pieces. If the question was about carving something out of existing wood pieces, then it would be twice as much work to do twice as many pieces.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You might want to factor in how tired Mr. Sawyer gets. The rate of work slows down as production increases.
That’s exactly how my brain looked at it. Unfortunately too many people look at people as machines, so there’s little to no fatigue factored into planning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder of this is why I did miserably on the math SATs.
I can see why either 40 or 45 would be the right answer.
Explain how 40 could be the right answer?
Posted up thread, but 2x as long to do 2x as much work. 40 min.
Interesting how some people were focused on how many "cuts" while others saw it as production.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids answered: It depends. Is he in shape? Does he need a break to do more cuts? Is it the same size log and if so is it more difficult to cut it into smaller pieces versus larger pieces? And if it isn't the same size log, does it take longer to manipulate the larger log in the first place?
Sigh. Maybe this kid will get better grades in physics some day? Or become a lawyer.
This is exactly how I was answering it too. I overanalyze everything and wouldn't have even thought of this as a math problem in the first place.
Those are not remotely good answers to a CML. The answer line is a small little line.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder of this is why I did miserably on the math SATs.
I can see why either 40 or 45 would be the right answer.
Explain how 40 could be the right answer?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You might want to factor in how tired Mr. Sawyer gets. The rate of work slows down as production increases.
On the other hand, he's dealing with lighter pieces so it might be easier.
Honestly, I feel like 17 of those 20 minutes are going to be putting gas in the chainsaw, and getting it out of the garage in the first place.
I don't know, after he realized he cut the first ones wrong he's getting kind of stressed and sweaty and pretty soon he's going to saw off a finger.
Even worse--after all that he will realize he needed 11 psots, not 10, to put a post every 10 feet on a 100 foot stretch of yard by the driveway and he's going to have to cut down another tree.
So, if you have to visit the ER, and get emergency surgery, and then recuperate before you try, do you add the whole time to the total?
"If cutting a log into 10 pieces of wood took 2 months, 3 hours and $6,200 plus lost wages, what was the time and cost to chop a log into 15 pieces?"