Anonymous wrote:I just saw it this weekend and am still processing. But I think the parasite metaphor works in both directions. The poor family exploits the rich family by deceiving them into their jobs, living in the house as if it's theirs while they are away, dreaming about marrying into the family. The rich family exploits the poor family by expecting them to do whatever is asked just because they're paying them (the dad is a driver, but he's expected to dress in a headdress and be party entertainment) and by ultimately not really seeing them as people. (They all smell like the subway, shouldn't be familiar/"cross the line," literally are unseen under the coffee table when they're in the same room.) One could see the employment situation as a symbiotic relationship, but I think the point of the movie is that the overclass/underclass disparity and all that goes with it is ultimately destructive and disastrous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This movie is not Quentin Tarantino inspired. Not at all.
And have you rewatched Dances with Wolves lately? It doesn’t stand the test of time.
I’ve watched all 3 movies, and Parasite is way better and more Oscar-worthy than Dances with Wolves and The English Patient. By a mile. And I still like Dances with Wolves. (The English Patient is horrible).
And no this isn’t a Hollywood movie, nor is it a movie my parents would probably like or get, but it’s still good.
+1000
Anonymous wrote:It was not predictable.
I thought is was a pretty creative approach to class issues. All the staircases and the multiple layers. The water and flooding was also very well done.
The mix of striving for more vs accepting your lot in life. I feel like most of the movie scenes were symbolism and I almost need to watch it again because I didn't really know what I was watching the first time through.
I think the parasite is hope.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many DCUM types identify so much with the pampered rich family in this movie that they can’t handle any sort of satire or black comedy that ridicules their behavior. It cuts too close to the bone.
Many DCUM types liked it. And it made poor people out to be deceitful, violent and cruel. Everyone was awful except maybe the first driver and tutor. Maybe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parasite was good because the story and the actors were strong. It was unpredictable, unlike a movie like say “San Andreas”.
Also, the characters were nuanced and not all good or all evil.
There was a lot of symbolism and humor in the movie.
Finally, it was good because it passes the Bechdel test, and isn’t just a story about old white men talking to more white men, about war or sports. It has both strong female and make characters.
Thank you. See, this all seems like a very low bar to me and I thought it was even predictable except for a couple absurd, violent scenes. Explains why I’m unimpressed.
LOL. Predictable? BS.
What surprised you other than the shelter and party scene?
Those significant plot twists were “predictable” for you?
My god. The people defending this movie as “great” can’t read.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parasite was good because the story and the actors were strong. It was unpredictable, unlike a movie like say “San Andreas”.
Also, the characters were nuanced and not all good or all evil.
There was a lot of symbolism and humor in the movie.
Finally, it was good because it passes the Bechdel test, and isn’t just a story about old white men talking to more white men, about war or sports. It has both strong female and make characters.
Thank you. See, this all seems like a very low bar to me and I thought it was even predictable except for a couple absurd, violent scenes. Explains why I’m unimpressed.
LOL. Predictable? BS.
What surprised you other than the shelter and party scene?
Those significant plot twists were “predictable” for you?