Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ thanks for providing the link. I don’t know enough about addiction pathways to know whether there are multiple addiction pathways or just the one mentioned in the article.
Honestly, I’m not that interested in the sex addiction label but more interested in the changes that habitual use of pornography can induce. I think there are biological and potentially behavioral (expectation of porn type sex in a relationship) implications.
Also, previous link included links to multiple studies and so can be considered a review whereas the Lehmiller link only includes one article. I’ve not previously liked much of lehmiller’s posts on his blog. I don’t find it to be very informative but that’s just a single person’s perspective.
I think you just want to believe what you want to believe.
Anonymous wrote:^ thanks for providing the link. I don’t know enough about addiction pathways to know whether there are multiple addiction pathways or just the one mentioned in the article.
Honestly, I’m not that interested in the sex addiction label but more interested in the changes that habitual use of pornography can induce. I think there are biological and potentially behavioral (expectation of porn type sex in a relationship) implications.
Also, previous link included links to multiple studies and so can be considered a review whereas the Lehmiller link only includes one article. I’ve not previously liked much of lehmiller’s posts on his blog. I don’t find it to be very informative but that’s just a single person’s perspective.
Anonymous wrote:^ thanks for providing the link. I don’t know enough about addiction pathways to know whether there are multiple addiction pathways or just the one mentioned in the article.
Honestly, I’m not that interested in the sex addiction label but more interested in the changes that habitual use of pornography can induce. I think there are biological and potentially behavioral (expectation of porn type sex in a relationship) implications.
Also, previous link included links to multiple studies and so can be considered a review whereas the Lehmiller link only includes one article. I’ve not previously liked much of lehmiller’s posts on his blog. I don’t find it to be very informative but that’s just a single person’s perspective.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone please please list some female friendly porn sites that won’t infect my phone or iPad? Asking for a friend.
Thanks.
HILARIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Can someone please please list some female friendly porn sites that won’t infect my phone or iPad? Asking for a friend.
Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All men watch some porn. Honestly I thought most women do too.
Woman here. I used to, but porn has become way too perverted these days. I know this may sound odd, but I’ve noticed a change in the content, and it’s a turnoff.
It’s not odd, it’s real. And it’s a problem. Porn is so readily available on smartphones, that men viewing it get used to the soft stuff and need porn that is more and more perverse to have a reaction. And porn producers are supplying it. https://amgreatness.com/2019/12/15/a-science-based-case-for-ending-the-porn-epidemic/
Interesting article. I have not read scientific data behind porn addiction and this article is a good review.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All men watch some porn. Honestly I thought most women do too.
Woman here. I used to, but porn has become way too perverted these days. I know this may sound odd, but I’ve noticed a change in the content, and it’s a turnoff.
It’s not odd, it’s real. And it’s a problem. Porn is so readily available on smartphones, that men viewing it get used to the soft stuff and need porn that is more and more perverse to have a reaction. And porn producers are supplying it. https://amgreatness.com/2019/12/15/a-science-based-case-for-ending-the-porn-epidemic/
I went to a porn site and clicked on “most popular”. I was disgusted to see a lot of it was incest/step child. It’s horrible.