Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work because I make decent money ($200k) in a job that is stimulating and that I am good at (inhouse lawyer). I work strictly 9-5, have 5 weeks vacation time, and a 15 minute commute.
DH makes about the same as I do and we can certainly live comfortably on his income, but my working affords us a lot more options as another poster said: better vacations, more savings for an earlier retirement, expensive hobbies. Right now, my entire paycheck goes into savings, so we are able to spend and enjoy all of DH's income (except he maxes out 401(k)). If I wasn't working, we would need to devote a large chunk of DH's paycheck to saving (emergency, college funds, investment, etc.).
If things continue as they do with our savings rate and ROI, we will be on track to be able to replace my income with income from our passive investments in 5 years.
I debate between staying home with our young kids (4 and 2) or continuing to work so DH and I can both retire in the next 10 years (if we want, though health insurance will make that tough).
I'm PP from above, and would add that if I could work part-time for half the pay, I would totally do that. I think part-time in a job that is intellectually stimulating is the sweet spot, but that is hard to come by.
Ditto to all this, plus the part where I would go part time. Wish there was a way to job share!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Intellectual stimulation, social interaction, serving an underprivileged population and using an education that took many years to complete. Oh and being a role model to my daughters!
All this and my financial independence. From what I’ve seen from others, s—- happens. Even to people like me.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of people posting on this thread are former SAHMs who were home with young kids, and now have school-aged kids. But the real question is why do some women work with young kids (and miss spending time with them) even if they can afford not to? For me, it was because I had an extremely flexible job, an involved DH, and a ton of family help, which enabled me to reduce childcare hours to 25-30 hours a week (of which 10+ hours was spent in naps). If I hadn't had this, I would have quit.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of people posting on this thread are former SAHMs who were home with young kids, and now have school-aged kids. But the real question is why do some women work with young kids (and miss spending time with them) even if they can afford not to? For me, it was because I had an extremely flexible job, an involved DH, and a ton of family help, which enabled me to reduce childcare hours to 25-30 hours a week (of which 10+ hours was spent in naps). If I hadn't had this, I would have quit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work because I make decent money ($200k) in a job that is stimulating and that I am good at (inhouse lawyer). I work strictly 9-5, have 5 weeks vacation time, and a 15 minute commute.
DH makes about the same as I do and we can certainly live comfortably on his income, but my working affords us a lot more options as another poster said: better vacations, more savings for an earlier retirement, expensive hobbies. Right now, my entire paycheck goes into savings, so we are able to spend and enjoy all of DH's income (except he maxes out 401(k)). If I wasn't working, we would need to devote a large chunk of DH's paycheck to saving (emergency, college funds, investment, etc.).
If things continue as they do with our savings rate and ROI, we will be on track to be able to replace my income with income from our passive investments in 5 years.
I debate between staying home with our young kids (4 and 2) or continuing to work so DH and I can both retire in the next 10 years (if we want, though health insurance will make that tough).
I'm PP from above, and would add that if I could work part-time for half the pay, I would totally do that. I think part-time in a job that is intellectually stimulating is the sweet spot, but that is hard to come by.
Anonymous wrote:A few years ago I watched a friend of the family heartlessly dump his wife of 20 years for his mistress. Wife had never worked, married him straight out of college. Now she's having to work as a secretary somewhere and solo parent 4 kids while he jetsets with his girlfriend. It was a huge shock - he seemed like such an upstanding guy, they were a very affectionate, lovey-dovey couple, and she was and still is very attractive and well maintained.
I'm not going to let myself depend on someone, ever. Of course we all think our husbands would NEVER... But on the off chance he does bail, I know I'm going to land on my feet.
Anonymous wrote:I work because I make decent money ($200k) in a job that is stimulating and that I am good at (inhouse lawyer). I work strictly 9-5, have 5 weeks vacation time, and a 15 minute commute.
DH makes about the same as I do and we can certainly live comfortably on his income, but my working affords us a lot more options as another poster said: better vacations, more savings for an earlier retirement, expensive hobbies. Right now, my entire paycheck goes into savings, so we are able to spend and enjoy all of DH's income (except he maxes out 401(k)). If I wasn't working, we would need to devote a large chunk of DH's paycheck to saving (emergency, college funds, investment, etc.).
If things continue as they do with our savings rate and ROI, we will be on track to be able to replace my income with income from our passive investments in 5 years.
I debate between staying home with our young kids (4 and 2) or continuing to work so DH and I can both retire in the next 10 years (if we want, though health insurance will make that tough).