Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bike insurance is important in hit and run and underinsured motorists. Biker would be covered under no fault all medical expenses
Take all the $ from fines on motorists who park in bike lanes, put it in a fund for people hit by hit and run bike riders. You would have way more $ coming in than going out.
No you wouldn’t. Who actually gets fined for parking in the bike lane? It’s safer from fines than parking at the curb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bike insurance is important in hit and run and underinsured motorists. Biker would be covered under no fault all medical expenses
Take all the $ from fines on motorists who park in bike lanes, put it in a fund for people hit by hit and run bike riders. You would have way more $ coming in than going out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I kind of agree with tags just because it would be easier to identify people involved in accidents and recover stolen bikes.
But "equivalent of a fuel tax" for a vehicle that doesn't use fuel or damage the roads is extremely stupid.
Yes for identification purposes! Sibling (teen) biking to work was hit by car and police contacted my parents through the bike registration.
Anonymous wrote:I kind of agree with tags just because it would be easier to identify people involved in accidents and recover stolen bikes.
But "equivalent of a fuel tax" for a vehicle that doesn't use fuel or damage the roads is extremely stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Bike insurance is important in hit and run and underinsured motorists. Biker would be covered under no fault all medical expenses
Anonymous wrote:Bike insurance is important in hit and run and underinsured motorists. Biker would be covered under no fault all medical expenses
Also in NYC AKA Manhattan roughy the same amount of Pedestrians have been killed by bikers as cars.
Anonymous wrote:If you use the road, you need to help fund it. Right now, cyclists are taking advantage of a loophole that allows them to use roads paid for by automobile registration and tag fees and fuel taxes. This needs to stop.
Bikes need to be registered, tagged and insured, and there needs to be some sort of fuel tax equivalent paid.
I'm not suggesting it should be comparable to vehicles, because their impact on the roads is much smaller. But it should be scaled down appropriately to fit. A car might cost a few hundred dollars to register every couple years. A bike might perhaps cost $20. Same for fuel tax equivalent, maybe $5 annually.
This needs to become a reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bike insurance is important in hit and run and underinsured motorists. Biker would be covered under no fault all medical expenses
Also in NYC AKA Manhattan roughy the same amount of Pedestrians have been killed by bikers as cars.
In NYC so far this year (2019):
Drivers have killed 104 pedestrians
Drivers have killed 27 bicyclists
Bicyclists have killed 2 pedestrians
Anonymous wrote:Bike insurance is important in hit and run and underinsured motorists. Biker would be covered under no fault all medical expenses
Also in NYC AKA Manhattan roughy the same amount of Pedestrians have been killed by bikers as cars.
Anonymous wrote:Hating bikes should be taxed. Also hating dogs should be taxed.