Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s bring in some charter schools (non-profit) to the east side of the county and see how they can help, both with overcrowding and achievement gap.
Aren't charter schools used as an end-run around desgregation?
No. And they’ve proven, in DC, to improve the test scores of FARMS students in both the Charters and the public schools. I assume this is because it alleviates overcrowding. We need to fix things for these kids now. Not wait the many years it takes for mcps to build new schools etc.
No. DC resident here. They're essentially a way for white/educated families to avoid their majority minority inboundary school. Charters siphon off the well-resourced families and perpetuate segregated schools.
And I'd love to see some statistics on charters and test scores, because I thought only KIPP had a winning formula. Other charters don't show better performance when broken down by demographics--for example, Creative Minds has a large proportion of UMC white families, and their test scores are still poor across groups.
Not to mention: how many middle-class families send their children to KIPP schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s bring in some charter schools (non-profit) to the east side of the county and see how they can help, both with overcrowding and achievement gap.
Aren't charter schools used as an end-run around desgregation?
No. And they’ve proven, in DC, to improve the test scores of FARMS students in both the Charters and the public schools. I assume this is because it alleviates overcrowding. We need to fix things for these kids now. Not wait the many years it takes for mcps to build new schools etc.
No. DC resident here. They're essentially a way for white/educated families to avoid their majority minority inboundary school. Charters siphon off the well-resourced families and perpetuate segregated schools.
And I'd love to see some statistics on charters and test scores, because I thought only KIPP had a winning formula. Other charters don't show better performance when broken down by demographics--for example, Creative Minds has a large proportion of UMC white families, and their test scores are still poor across groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s bring in some charter schools (non-profit) to the east side of the county and see how they can help, both with overcrowding and achievement gap.
Aren't charter schools used as an end-run around desgregation?
No. And they’ve proven, in DC, to improve the test scores of FARMS students in both the Charters and the public schools. I assume this is because it alleviates overcrowding. We need to fix things for these kids now. Not wait the many years it takes for mcps to build new schools etc.
No. DC resident here. They're essentially a way for white/educated families to avoid their majority minority inboundary school. Charters siphon off the well-resourced families and perpetuate segregated schools.
And I'd love to see some statistics on charters and test scores, because I thought only KIPP had a winning formula. Other charters don't show better performance when broken down by demographics--for example, Creative Minds has a large proportion of UMC white families, and their test scores are still poor across groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s bring in some charter schools (non-profit) to the east side of the county and see how they can help, both with overcrowding and achievement gap.
Aren't charter schools used as an end-run around desgregation?
No. And they’ve proven, in DC, to improve the test scores of FARMS students in both the Charters and the public schools. I assume this is because it alleviates overcrowding. We need to fix things for these kids now. Not wait the many years it takes for mcps to build new schools etc.
No. DC resident here. They're essentially a way for white/educated families to avoid their majority minority inboundary school. Charters siphon off the well-resourced families and perpetuate segregated schools.
And I'd love to see some statistics on charters and test scores, because I thought only KIPP had a winning formula. Other charters don't show better performance when broken down by demographics--for example, Creative Minds has a large proportion of UMC white families, and their test scores are still poor across groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Four pages of people explicitly defending segregated schools.
But MCPS is not responsible for housing policies. They are trying to de-segregate as much as they can by busing, much to the disgust of many parents. What exactly is the school district supposed to do about the fact there are very few low income housing in certain parts of the county? How can the school district force wealthier parents to live in the poorer parts of the county?
Heading on to five pages of people explicitly defending segregated schools...
? How am I defending it? I'm saying school districts can't do much about housing policies. And you didn't answer the questions. If you can answer that $64K question of how the school district can change housing policies, then you should run for the school board since you seem to think you have the answers.
And I don't live in a W cluster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Four pages of people explicitly defending segregated schools.
But MCPS is not responsible for housing policies. They are trying to de-segregate as much as they can by busing, much to the disgust of many parents. What exactly is the school district supposed to do about the fact there are very few low income housing in certain parts of the county? How can the school district force wealthier parents to live in the poorer parts of the county?
Heading on to five pages of people explicitly defending segregated schools...
Actually many people are not defending the segregated schools as much as saying that it is not the school board's place to try to fix them. It is the county council. Bussing has never worked in the past. Fix the bigger issue and the school's will be fixed in turn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Four pages of people explicitly defending segregated schools.
But MCPS is not responsible for housing policies. They are trying to de-segregate as much as they can by busing, much to the disgust of many parents. What exactly is the school district supposed to do about the fact there are very few low income housing in certain parts of the county? How can the school district force wealthier parents to live in the poorer parts of the county?
Heading on to five pages of people explicitly defending segregated schools...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Four pages of people explicitly defending segregated schools.
But MCPS is not responsible for housing policies. They are trying to de-segregate as much as they can by busing, much to the disgust of many parents. What exactly is the school district supposed to do about the fact there are very few low income housing in certain parts of the county? How can the school district force wealthier parents to live in the poorer parts of the county?
Heading on to five pages of people explicitly defending segregated schools...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s bring in some charter schools (non-profit) to the east side of the county and see how they can help, both with overcrowding and achievement gap.
Aren't charter schools used as an end-run around desgregation?
No. And they’ve proven, in DC, to improve the test scores of FARMS students in both the Charters and the public schools. I assume this is because it alleviates overcrowding. We need to fix things for these kids now. Not wait the many years it takes for mcps to build new schools etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s bring in some charter schools (non-profit) to the east side of the county and see how they can help, both with overcrowding and achievement gap.
Aren't charter schools used as an end-run around desgregation?
No. And they’ve proven, in DC, to improve the test scores of FARMS students in both the Charters and the public schools. I assume this is because it alleviates overcrowding. We need to fix things for these kids now. Not wait the many years it takes for mcps to build new schools etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Four pages of people explicitly defending segregated schools.
But MCPS is not responsible for housing policies. They are trying to de-segregate as much as they can by busing, much to the disgust of many parents. What exactly is the school district supposed to do about the fact there are very few low income housing in certain parts of the county? How can the school district force wealthier parents to live in the poorer parts of the county?
Anonymous wrote:Four pages of people explicitly defending segregated schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s bring in some charter schools (non-profit) to the east side of the county and see how they can help, both with overcrowding and achievement gap.
Aren't charter schools used as an end-run around desgregation?
Anonymous wrote:https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/schools/mcps-segregation-exacerbates-student-achievement-disparities-report-says/
3/4 of black, Hispanic/Latino, and ESOL students are in high-poverty elementary schools
2/3 of white, Asian, and multiracial/ethnic students are in low-poverty elementary schools