Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And even though she says she regrets her past ugly anti-gay stances, I find it hard to trust it's still gone.

She is still in the Science of Identity Foundation, which is a cult. A gay hate cult. Here’s a sample of what he thinks of Muslims and gays.


More here: http://iowainformer.com/politics/2019/09/will-tulsi-gabbard-answer-questions-about-her-lgbtq-hate-guru/

She’s shady AF.

And Biden is still in the Catholic cult that rapes children and promotes pedophilia. And some of the other candidates are in the Christian supremacy cult that believers people that don’t believe in the guy on a cross as a savior are lost souls that will spend eternity in hell that’s supposed to be a ring of fire with a scary red demon torturing them.

Shady AF

Wow. Just wow.

You need to go back to "Speak like an American" class, Boris.

PP, you need to start acting like a thinking human and stop imagining the Russians are everywhere.

DP. I thought the wing nut was referring to Boris Johnson. Pity the uneducated know only two Russian names. One would think they read a bit of Russian literature, even at the community college.

I started reading Russian literature in junior high school, Raskolnikov . I am surprised you think a lot of people study Russian Literature in community college.

No, I am surprised that the liberal DCUM wags who fancy themselves as Russian experts know only the names Vladimir and Boris. Given your junior high school erudition, you would know that Raskolnikov is the surname of a character with the first name of Rodion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I don't think Tulsi is a strong national candidate.

However, for the life of me I don't know why people think it is OK to say she's a Russian agent. Hillary needs to sit down and let the next generation take the fight to Trump.

No, Hillary is the rightful 45th President. She warned us about Donald and she was correct. She didn’t even name Tulsi, and Tulsi’s mad. Why? Because she’s a Russian asset (not an agent). You know Tulsi and Yang are going to try a third party run. Why? Because like Bernie and Marianne Williamson, they’re not serious candidates. They’re spoilers. Go away, spoilers.

Also Gabbard sits on a board funded by the Kochs. Gross.

Speaking of spoilers, Clinton spoiled Biden’s chance of winning the presidency in 2016. If anyone is the rightful 45th President, it is Biden. If Hillary hadn’t muscled him out if the way, we would have been spared Trump and gave a continuation of Obama. Four years later, it is too late for Biden.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I don't think Tulsi is a strong national candidate.

However, for the life of me I don't know why people think it is OK to say she's a Russian agent. Hillary needs to sit down and let the next generation take the fight to Trump.

No, Hillary is the rightful 45th President. She warned us about Donald and she was correct. She didn’t even name Tulsi, and Tulsi’s mad. Why? Because she’s a Russian asset (not an agent). You know Tulsi and Yang are going to try a third party run. Why? Because like Bernie and Marianne Williamson, they’re not serious candidates. They’re spoilers. Go away, spoilers.

Also Gabbard sits on a board funded by the Kochs. Gross.

How did the election end? Hillary conceded to Trump end of story. She lost and Trump will win again. Deal with it

Anonymous wrote:
I don't think Tulsi is a strong national candidate.

However, for the life of me I don't know why people think it is OK to say she's a Russian agent. Hillary needs to sit down and let the next generation take the fight to Trump.

No, Hillary is the rightful 45th President. She warned us about Donald and she was correct. She didn’t even name Tulsi, and Tulsi’s mad. Why? Because she’s a Russian asset (not an agent). You know Tulsi and Yang are going to try a third party run. Why? Because like Bernie and Marianne Williamson, they’re not serious candidates. They’re spoilers. Go away, spoilers.

Also Gabbard sits on a board funded by the Kochs. Gross.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I don't think Tulsi is a strong national candidate.

However, for the life of me I don't know why people think it is OK to say she's a Russian agent. Hillary needs to sit down and let the next generation take the fight to Trump.

Same here. Independent who doesn't think she's a viable candidate but totally puzzled by HRC's attack on her.

HRC's feud with Tulsi goes back to 2016. HRC partly blamed Bernie Bros for her loss in 2016. Tulsi was the vice chair of DNC. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was the chair during the primary. Tulsi was vocal about Debbie's handling of Bernie and quit her job at DNC to endorse Bernie.

[quote=Anonymous]When you look at her platform, it's all common sense type stuff, the sort of things every Democrat should be in favor of.

She is for:

Banning Assault rifles and high cap magazines. She cosponsored a bill to do just that. Wants universal background checks and mandatory confiscation of existing AR15 weapons. -Ok, sounds like a good start. Maybe not enough, but she's a pragmatist.

Wants $15.00/hr Min wage. - Ok, who doesn't favor this? I think $25-$30 is more reasonable, but it's a start at least.


For reparations. - Who isn't?


Wants to abolish the Electoral College. - 100% agreed. Take it a step further though, and elect senators by popular vote, too.

Is opposed to all fossil and nuclear fuels. - this is a no-brainer.


Favors Medicare for all. Again, who doesn't?


Thinks College should be free. - Spot on.


Abortion should have no restrictions. - Exactly.


Wants international pricing on medication. - Hell yes.


Wants Citizenship for Dreamers. - As opposed to what?


Slash the Defense budget. - Gee, a military officer who wants to end military adventurism? That makes her literally THE most honest person on earth.





These are CORE Democratic values. Every single one of them. But all everyone wants to do is destroy her. I just can't wrap my head around it. [/quote]

Dem and I do not agree with free college, no reparations binder any circumstances!, abortions should have some restrictions, e.g., you think it would be fine if a woman at eight months decides to abort? Senators are elected by popular vote. Also, I simply do not like her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And even though she says she regrets her past ugly anti-gay stances, I find it hard to trust it's still gone.

She is still in the Science of Identity Foundation, which is a cult. A gay hate cult. Here’s a sample of what he thinks of Muslims and gays.


More here: http://iowainformer.com/politics/2019/09/will-tulsi-gabbard-answer-questions-about-her-lgbtq-hate-guru/

She’s shady AF.

And Biden is still in the Catholic cult that rapes children and promotes pedophilia. And some of the other candidates are in the Christian supremacy cult that believers people that don’t believe in the guy on a cross as a savior are lost souls that will spend eternity in hell that’s supposed to be a ring of fire with a scary red demon torturing them.

Shady AF

Wow. Just wow.

You need to go back to "Speak like an American" class, Boris.

PP, you need to start acting like a thinking human and stop imagining the Russians are everywhere.

DP. I thought the wing nut was referring to Boris Johnson. Pity the uneducated know only two Russian names. One would think they read a bit of Russian literature, even at the community college.

I started reading Russian literature in junior high school, Raskolnikov . I am surprised you think a lot of people study Russian Literature in community college.

She has a history of being Anti-Muslim. That’s a new n starter for me. So many other candidates offer to deliver the same promises without the anti-Muslim mindset.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I don't think Tulsi is a strong national candidate.

However, for the life of me I don't know why people think it is OK to say she's a Russian agent. Hillary needs to sit down and let the next generation take the fight to Trump.

No one’s saying she’s an agent, they’re saying she’s an asset. There’s a difference.

This distinction went over the heads of the media and Hillary's critics.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When she started accusing her own party of rigging the election, she lost most of the voters.

She actually told the truth.

Very few Democrats would agree, but it does explain why Republicans love her.

You are saying that all those Bernie supporters in 2016 were....Republicans?

It is a known fact that Hillary controlled the DNC and manipulated the process to benefit herself.

Lies not facts.

Did Hillary force all those people to vote for her over Bernie? How did that happen?

You're so misinformed....you're not Russian by any chance?

"Brazile took over the DNC as interim chair following Debbie Wasserman Schultz's sudden resignation during the Democratic National Convention. Once she was at the party's helm, Brazile wrote that she discovered an agreement that "specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff."

https://www.npr.org/2017/11/03/561976645/clinton-campaign-had-additional-signed-agreement-with-dnc-in-2015

Is Bernie a member of the Democratic Party?

Anonymous wrote:
I don't think Tulsi is a strong national candidate.

However, for the life of me I don't know why people think it is OK to say she's a Russian agent. Hillary needs to sit down and let the next generation take the fight to Trump.

No one’s saying she’s an agent, they’re saying she’s an asset. There’s a difference.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I don't think Tulsi is a strong national candidate.

However, for the life of me I don't know why people think it is OK to say she's a Russian agent. Hillary needs to sit down and let the next generation take the fight to Trump.

Same here. Independent who doesn't think she's a viable candidate but totally puzzled by HRC's attack on her.

+1

Anonymous wrote:
I don't think Tulsi is a strong national candidate.

However, for the life of me I don't know why people think it is OK to say she's a Russian agent. Hillary needs to sit down and let the next generation take the fight to Trump.

Same here. Independent who doesn't think she's a viable candidate but totally puzzled by HRC's attack on her.

I don't think Tulsi is a strong national candidate.

However, for the life of me I don't know why people think it is OK to say she's a Russian agent. Hillary needs to sit down and let the next generation take the fight to Trump.

It is infuriating to read the posts by non-Democratic voter supporting a shallow, easily flattered dim bulb whiner like Gabbatd as the party’s only hope. She is not a serious person and she loves anti-Muslim dictators. She is a dishonest person.