Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can an unhooked kid kid still get into a top college if they limit their APs to the core classes (including foreign language)? Do top schools expect to see applicants taking their electives in things like AP Stat, AP European History, etc, or can they actually take fun electives like drama, culinary, music tech?
Why are those things school classes? They seem more like extracurriculars.
Huh? Didn't your HS offer theater, band, chorus, Home Ec, Shop as electives?
Band and chorus are after school or before school activities in some places.
Home ec, shop, etc. are classes that average or poor students take, not serious students.
I think.... you’re not American. You’re imagining a childhood in a different country.
Anonymous wrote:Let’s talk numbers. For example, Penn Stare has approximately 100,000 freshman apps. With a limited time to review and a staff of x number admissions officers. If anyone thinks large Universities read your DC essay or cares that they take a few electives, I have a bridge to sell you.
I’m not saying don’t have your child do their best, but this thread is absurd,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is a shame that young teens are so career-oriented that they can't explore the Arts or practical/fun skills.
My kid did take Yoga for PE credits once. And I wanted her to take the school's Financial Literacy offering (to learn about credit worthiness, for example, and student loans and buying a car). Unfortunately, she was steered away from it since the counselor thought she was "too smart.." Apparently, they perceive that class as a way for math-challenged kids to meet the graduation requirement.
That is wrong, don't you think? Practical skills come in handy in life.
I do. But I am the parent who is baffled why college prep students need BC Calc unless they are applying for math, engineering, physics or the like. But AP stats is considered a mark against you. I guess Calc is rigorous? But I’d prefer rigorous and useful.
+1
None of my (humanities track) kids took calculus, preferring instead to take Stats - a far more useful class for them. It didn’t seem to affect their college acceptances either.
But were they aiming for top 10 without hooks???[/quote]
Probably not. Some of these posters - especially the ones who are saying BC Calc isn't necessary for non-engineers are ignoring the title that specified what top colleges are looking for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is a shame that young teens are so career-oriented that they can't explore the Arts or practical/fun skills.
My kid did take Yoga for PE credits once. And I wanted her to take the school's Financial Literacy offering (to learn about credit worthiness, for example, and student loans and buying a car). Unfortunately, she was steered away from it since the counselor thought she was "too smart.." Apparently, they perceive that class as a way for math-challenged kids to meet the graduation requirement.
That is wrong, don't you think? Practical skills come in handy in life.
I do. But I am the parent who is baffled why college prep students need BC Calc unless they are applying for math, engineering, physics or the like. But AP stats is considered a mark against you. I guess Calc is rigorous? But I’d prefer rigorous and useful.
+1 My DD wants to do something in environmental science. She's on an accelerated math track and will do Calc AB in junior year so she could take Calc BC in senior year but I'd rather she take AP Stats. That will give her an introduction to the math that will be more important for her in college. At least she'll have the ability to take both. It annoys me that kids who are in pre-calc in 11th have to take Calc in 12th to have "rigor" instead of taking stats, which is probably more useful.
AB followed by BC?? That isn’t what was intended. Take one of them and move on.
That depends on how it’s taught. Some schools teach them as a sequence. First semester Calc. Second semester Calc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is a shame that young teens are so career-oriented that they can't explore the Arts or practical/fun skills.
My kid did take Yoga for PE credits once. And I wanted her to take the school's Financial Literacy offering (to learn about credit worthiness, for example, and student loans and buying a car). Unfortunately, she was steered away from it since the counselor thought she was "too smart.." Apparently, they perceive that class as a way for math-challenged kids to meet the graduation requirement.
That is wrong, don't you think? Practical skills come in handy in life.
I do. But I am the parent who is baffled why college prep students need BC Calc unless they are applying for math, engineering, physics or the like. But AP stats is considered a mark against you. I guess Calc is rigorous? But I’d prefer rigorous and useful.
+1 My DD wants to do something in environmental science. She's on an accelerated math track and will do Calc AB in junior year so she could take Calc BC in senior year but I'd rather she take AP Stats. That will give her an introduction to the math that will be more important for her in college. At least she'll have the ability to take both. It annoys me that kids who are in pre-calc in 11th have to take Calc in 12th to have "rigor" instead of taking stats, which is probably more useful.
AB followed by BC?? That isn’t what was intended. Take one of them and move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, they din’t, or, at least, not all of them do. My son graduated with 5 APs (the school offered around 20) and some post AP classes, just enough to check “most rigorous” box, plus his main EC showed that he is up for the challenge intellectually, and is not a slacker. He also had ballroom dancing and theater on his transcript. Got into a school from the top 10 on USNWR.
What are post AP classes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, it means their kids are happy and well settled at colleges that work for them.
This poster does not have to impress you in order for their advice to be valid.
Stop with the snobbery already. It really is not a competition.
Of course it isn’t a competition. But don’t chime in and imply that something isn’t needed (for the unhooked aiming for the top 10 or so). It is truly helpful to list the school’s one is referring to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can an unhooked kid kid still get into a top college if they limit their APs to the core classes (including foreign language)? Do top schools expect to see applicants taking their electives in things like AP Stat, AP European History, etc, or can they actually take fun electives like drama, culinary, music tech?
Why are those things school classes? They seem more like extracurriculars.
Huh? Didn't your HS offer theater, band, chorus, Home Ec, Shop as electives?
Band and chorus are after school or before school activities in some places.
Home ec, shop, etc. are classes that average or poor students take, not serious students.
Anonymous wrote:Let’s talk numbers. For example, Penn Stare has approximately 100,000 freshman apps. With a limited time to review and a staff of x number admissions officers. If anyone thinks large Universities read your DC essay or cares that they take a few electives, I have a bridge to sell you.
I’m not saying don’t have your child do their best, but this thread is absurd,
Anonymous wrote:No, it means their kids are happy and well settled at colleges that work for them.
This poster does not have to impress you in order for their advice to be valid.
Stop with the snobbery already. It really is not a competition.