Anonymous wrote:I actually know Ms. Chalupa. If you think she is a nefarious character in this play, you are sorely mistaken.

Oh, well, if you say so.

Anonymous wrote:And here we are again....another morning of insanity within the Trump administration...the Mueller report (for those who have read it) clearly addresses and answers the "questions" that Barr has....regrettably one can draw no other conclusion that Barr is doing everything possible to support Trump's claim of a witch hunt and for the life of me I can't figure out why. What is Barr looking to get out of this?

Barr is a treason weasel. Had the gop not lost its ethics, he would have been gone by now.

I actually know Ms. Chalupa. If you think she is a nefarious character in this play, you are sorely mistaken.

[quote=Anonymous]And here we are again....another morning of insanity within the Trump administration...the Mueller report (for those who have read it) clearly addresses and answers the "questions" that Barr has....regrettably one can draw no other conclusion that Barr is doing everything possible to support Trump's claim of a witch hunt and for the life of me I can't figure out why. What is Barr looking to get out of this?[/quote]

No, it actually doesn't at all.
There are MANY questions yet to be answered........

Did Mueller interview Alexandra Chalupa, who was reportedly working with the DNC? Nope.
This is just one of many questions.
Another - was Alexander Downer sent to set up George P? Was Downer acting as a spy?

[quote]Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.

A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation.

The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails.[/quote]

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

The investigations must run their course, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought Barr exonerated the president with the Mueller Report. Why are they going to such lengths to now discredit the Mueller report? And doing it in such an illegal way that also undermines our Intelligence Community?

It is batsh1t crazy.

Discredit the Mueller report? Where in the hell are you getting that idea?

This isn't about discrediting his report. It is to identify the origins of the disinformation that led to his entire investigation.
There is ample evidence that some in our IC community and government abused their power to force Mueller's investigation. If these people broke laws, shouldn't they be held accountable?

I know it may be a reach, but consider for a moment, that the origins of the investigation were legitimitate.

That perhaps Papadopolous, who was at best, an intern at the Hudson Institute, really had no business being considered a Foreign Policy Expert by the Trump Campaign.
That perhaps a number of unsavory people with backgrounds associated with crime in Ukraine and Russia were at the head of the Trump campaign.
That perhaps Trump himself, had been laundering Russian money for decades and was a compromised candidate.

Just consider that for a moment and then look at these activities today through a different lens.

And here we are again....another morning of insanity within the Trump administration...the Mueller report (for those who have read it) clearly addresses and answers the "questions" that Barr has....regrettably one can draw no other conclusion that Barr is doing everything possible to support Trump's claim of a witch hunt and for the life of me I can't figure out why. What is Barr looking to get out of this?

Anonymous wrote:I thought Barr exonerated the president with the Mueller Report. Why are they going to such lengths to now discredit the Mueller report? And doing it in such an illegal way that also undermines our Intelligence Community?

It is batsh1t crazy.

Discredit the Mueller report? Where in the hell are you getting that idea?

This isn't about discrediting his report. It is to identify the origins of the disinformation that led to his entire investigation.
There is ample evidence that some in our IC community and government abused their power to force Mueller's investigation. If these people broke laws, shouldn't they be held accountable?

So they are going to discover that 5Eyes collected information about Trump associates conversing with Russian assets in advance of the 2016 election.

The Dutch released video of the Russians literally hacking our election.

the Aussies reported the Papadapolous drunken confession.

I would guess other allies have other information.

Is the point to whitewash it? Ot to say it was all manufactured?

Either way, the fact is, there are standing allegations from the Mueller activity against Russian for the events of 2016. Why is Barr seeking to undermine the work done there?

I thought Barr exonerated the president with the Mueller Report. Why are they going to such lengths to now discredit the Mueller report? And doing it in such an illegal way that also undermines our Intelligence Community?

It is batsh1t crazy.

Evidently, Durham is with him.

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm I wonder if they are meeting with all these folks under the guise of an investigation but really coordinating another election scam. Barr is a lawyer on par with Guilani.

That’s probably closer to the truth. In any case, even if Barr were on the up and up, assisting in the investigation would not be an appropriate action. They’re all just filthy gangsters.

Honestly, does it even matter anymore? I don’t think it does. He’ll keep getting away with stuff. Going high when folks go low won’t ever work.

Hmmm I wonder if they are meeting with all these folks under the guise of an investigation but really coordinating another election scam. Barr is a lawyer on par with Guilani.

Gosh, why WOULD they be going to Italy:

March 14, 2016 – First known meeting. Papadopoulos met Mifsud in Italy approximately one week after officially joining the Trump team.