Anonymous wrote:I'm so disgusted with the people on this thread who think it's ok to handcuff and arrest a child. Just disgusted. People like you are why us SN parents live in constant fear for our kids. You all are gross.

Anonymous wrote:I'm so disgusted with the people on this thread who think it's ok to handcuff and arrest a child. Just disgusted. People like you are why us SN parents live in constant fear for our kids. You all are gross.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A sleep disorders does not cause a 6yo to throw a tantrum at school and then kick an adult. These kids seem to have no idea how to behave.. I'd be livid if my kid did this.

Lack of sleep definitely causes poor behavior, as well as exacerbating mental health issues and physical health problems. Don’t you feel at least a little grouchy when you don’t sleep well? Isn’t it worse after several nights? Now imagine feeling like that with the mental abilities and impulse control of a 6 year old. It could definitely lead to a tantrum, and tantruming kids sometimes kick.

It’s not a good situation. It’s not okay behavior. But it’s not arrest-worthy.

O.k....if the parent/guardian *knows* that the kid is suffering from sleep apnea why isn't the condition being treated? Isn't sleep apnea potentially life threatening?

It takes a while to diagnose and treat issues. We (DH, pediatrician, and me) strongly suspect that sleep apnea is what’s causing my DD to feel tired all the time, her school performance to suffer, some balance issues, worsening anxiety, and a few other less worrisome symptoms. We have great insurance. It’s still going to take about 4 months from me noticing the symptoms worsening and needing intervention to getting a CPAP, assuming sleep apnea is the problem. That’s with educated, middle class, involved parents following up with doctors and staying on top of the situation. First we had to rule out a few obvious concerns, wait for a referral, wait longer for an appointment, then we’ll have to wait for them to diagnose her, wait for another appointment for a cpap machine, then wait for symptoms to improve. I don’t know the circumstances of the child in the background, but if they have a less than stellar insurance or financial situation, or if the parents have trouble getting off work for appointments, the process could take longer.

Why is it so hard to show compassion to the child and her family instead of blaming them for everything? Why is it so hard to blame the overzealous officer who didn’t follow procedures?

Well, in this case...sleep apnea was brought up as the reason for the girl's behavior issues. The parent/guardian was aware that the child had this potentially deadly health condition.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am seriously shocked. I thought of all stories, there would be unanimous thought that you don't arrest and handcuff and mugshot a six-year-old. It's dumbfounding to me that anyone is defending this. You're defending a man who violated policy and was fired for it, yet some of you think it's still justified? This is seriously messed up.

There's a difference in defending this and acknowledging that this was most likely an extreme situation and that we don't know the half of what actually happened.

No, I don't think a 6 year old child should be arrested, finger printed and booked. I do see how a school might have run out of options to deal with the situation, though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And an 8 year old in the same week.

This is sickening and absolutely a racial thing. School to Prison Pipeline right here.

I live in Orlando and it's very much in the news in a WTAF sort of way, so it's not like everyone down here is "what, what's the problem." The officer was suspended and the prosecutor refused to do jack about it, so the "system" is at least working there. Despite the fact that the system never should have been invoked.

The officer is black.

DP but officers of every color feel much freer to arrest and mistreat black children than white. A racial thing doesn't necessarily mean personal animus - most racism is societal. Society will bring the hammer down on a cop that arrests a little white girl, regardless of context. Meanwhile society, as expressed by DCUM, will go give us countless logical contortions about the vicious kicking beast that had to be controlled when the story is about a black girl.

Wow, that is an iron clad excuse of all excuses if you ask me. Well done!

I'm sorry you don't understand structural racism. There are approximately infinity studies on the topic showing that black people get arrested for things white people get warnings for; that black children's misbehavior is criminalized while white children get timeouts. Reality isn't usually seen as an "excuse," but I guess if you really don't want reality acknowledged you might be a tad miffed.

O.k. so the answer is to allow a little girl suffering from behavioral issues caused by sleep apnea to continue to kick the crap out of her teacher, disrupt her classroom and defy authority? You know that's crazy, right?

She didn't kick her teacher, she kicked a staffer in the principal's office. And even then, she didn't "kick the crap out of" anyone, she kicked someone once, and only after they grabbed her arms. But keep up the "vicious kicking beast" narrative. It's a great look. You're not on the wrong side of this narrative at all, with all your made up facts and demands for complete obeisance from first graders.

You are saying that the school staff mishandled the situation? If they had handled it correctly a resource officer would not have been brought in?

Believe it or not, I do find the idea of a 6 year old being arrested pretty appalling. But I also find it hard to believe that a situation with a 6 year old ever escalated to this level in the first place. I have personally never witnessed anything remotely like this and I tend to think that this was a highly unusual situation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GMAFB... the officer has issues.

He has been arrested for beating his own 7yo child.

There is NO...NONE...NADA reason to arrest and 8 year old!

How was a man who was arrested for beating a child employed as a resource officer?? Crazy!

Why would the school bring a person like that in to handle a run of the mill tantrum? More questions than answers here!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am seriously shocked. I thought of all stories, there would be unanimous thought that you don't arrest and handcuff and mugshot a six-year-old. It's dumbfounding to me that anyone is defending this. You're defending a man who violated policy and was fired for it, yet some of you think it's still justified? This is seriously messed up.

There's a difference in defending this and acknowledging that this was most likely an extreme situation and that we don't know the half of what actually happened.

No, I don't think a 6 year old child should be arrested, finger printed and booked. I do see how a school might have run out of options to deal with the situation, though.

Twice? Yeah, right.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am seriously shocked. I thought of all stories, there would be unanimous thought that you don't arrest and handcuff and mugshot a six-year-old. It's dumbfounding to me that anyone is defending this. You're defending a man who violated policy and was fired for it, yet some of you think it's still justified? This is seriously messed up.

There's a difference in defending this and acknowledging that this was most likely an extreme situation and that we don't know the half of what actually happened.

No, I don't think a 6 year old child should be arrested, finger printed and booked. I do see how a school might have run out of options to deal with the situation, though.

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of folks on this thread making up facts out of whole cloth. Inventing a story where this child was "kicking the crap out of" her classmates and teachers, etc.

I'd like to invite those folks to consider that their (entirely fictional) version of events is racialized, and based on this idea of Black people - even Black children - as being somehow extra violent, and extra dangerous.

There has been extensive writing on how Black children are essentially denied childhood, because they are assumed to be dangerous from the moment they are no longer toddlers.

The results of the findings were that black girls were perceived to be more mature and less innocent, which directly affects young black females with the way they’re treated in educational and criminal justice systems. This “adultification” makes adults cast the same stereotypes on kids as they do on adult black women. “It’s the stereotype of black women as being loud, aggressive, and over-sexualized,” said co-author Jamilia Blake, of Texas A&M University, to the New York Times. “You can trace [these stereotypes] all the way back to slavery.”

https://www.todaysparent.com/kids/school-age/black-girls-face-discrimination-as-young-as-five-years-old-says-new-study/

Anonymous wrote:I am seriously shocked. I thought of all stories, there would be unanimous thought that you don't arrest and handcuff and mugshot a six-year-old. It's dumbfounding to me that anyone is defending this. You're defending a man who violated policy and was fired for it, yet some of you think it's still justified? This is seriously messed up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And an 8 year old in the same week.

This is sickening and absolutely a racial thing. School to Prison Pipeline right here.

I live in Orlando and it's very much in the news in a WTAF sort of way, so it's not like everyone down here is "what, what's the problem." The officer was suspended and the prosecutor refused to do jack about it, so the "system" is at least working there. Despite the fact that the system never should have been invoked.

The officer is black.

DP but officers of every color feel much freer to arrest and mistreat black children than white. A racial thing doesn't necessarily mean personal animus - most racism is societal. Society will bring the hammer down on a cop that arrests a little white girl, regardless of context. Meanwhile society, as expressed by DCUM, will go give us countless logical contortions about the vicious kicking beast that had to be controlled when the story is about a black girl.

Wow, that is an iron clad excuse of all excuses if you ask me. Well done!

I'm sorry you don't understand structural racism. There are approximately infinity studies on the topic showing that black people get arrested for things white people get warnings for; that black children's misbehavior is criminalized while white children get timeouts. Reality isn't usually seen as an "excuse," but I guess if you really don't want reality acknowledged you might be a tad miffed.

O.k. so the answer is to allow a little girl suffering from behavioral issues caused by sleep apnea to continue to kick the crap out of her teacher, disrupt her classroom and defy authority? You know that's crazy, right?

She didn't kick her teacher, she kicked a staffer in the principal's office. And even then, she didn't "kick the crap out of" anyone, she kicked someone once, and only after they grabbed her arms. But keep up the "vicious kicking beast" narrative. It's a great look. You're not on the wrong side of this narrative at all, with all your made up facts and demands for complete obeisance from first graders.