Anonymous wrote:The entire premise of this thread is dumb, short sighted, and immature. How old are you OP, 20 something?
PP, who only gets married for sex? It's just not that simple and what a shallow person if they do.
Anonymous wrote:Men get married because they want children, or more accurately they want their offspring (genetic material) in the world, and they want a woman to take care of them. It's scientifically proven that married men have a longer lifespan than single men.
The modern marriage is a bad deal for women. It used to be an institution to protect women and the children. With women working and making significant money, but also facing approximately the same childcare and household burden, it's nothing more than increased responsibility. That's why married women have shorter lives compared to single or widowed women. However, it is still the best for children to grow up in a traditional, two parent family so women put up with a lot in order for the children to be protected. It's also expensive to run two households, which also
means less resources for the children.
A ton of . iologically, for child ause the one with the best sperm gets to reproduce. In modern life, this gets translated to
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some people get married with the false expectation that marriage gives them some legal entitlement to sex at a certain frequency.
Agree. Or if not a legal entitlement, a moral one.
It seems to be a cultural norm that a man's ongoing desire for sex is more important than a woman's equally normal waning interest in sex, after menopause (or for some, after childbirth). I'm not sure why that's fair.
Implicit in monogamy is the idea that one’s spouse will engage in a reasonable amount of sex. No one views marriage as a potential vow of celibacy at someone else’s discretion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some people get married with the false expectation that marriage gives them some legal entitlement to sex at a certain frequency.
Agree. Or if not a legal entitlement, a moral one.
It seems to be a cultural norm that a man's ongoing desire for sex is more important than a woman's equally normal waning interest in sex, after menopause (or for some, after childbirth). I'm not sure why that's fair.
Implicit in monogamy is the idea that one’s spouse will engage in a reasonable amount of sex. No one views marriage as a potential vow of celibacy at someone else’s discretion.
At someone else's discretion? Do you think there are a lot of people out there who choose to lose interest in sex without a legitimate reason? W
Implicit in marriage is the concept of for better or for worse. Where is the empathy for these people?
Anybody with a "legitimate reason for no sex" should divorce. If your partner is so horrible as to not want sex, clearly you must leave them.
Your statement "for better of for worse" applies equally to the rejected partner who seeks sex elsewhere.... no big deal right? Sex isn't important right? Otherwise you'd be having it right? So they are sleeping around: deal with it. For better or for worse.
Having low libido after a certain age makes one a horrible partner? Hate to tell you, but it's pretty normal for menopausal women to have low to no sex drive. It's just a biological fact. Many continue to have sex with their husbands despite the lack of interest, and in some cases despite physical discomfort and frequent urinary tract infections. That makes them pretty generous, in my opinion. A screw-me-or-divorce-me-or-let-me-roam attitude would not inspire a whole lot of generosity in my house. Kindness, respect and gratitude are part of a marriage, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some people get married with the false expectation that marriage gives them some legal entitlement to sex at a certain frequency.
Agree. Or if not a legal entitlement, a moral one.
It seems to be a cultural norm that a man's ongoing desire for sex is more important than a woman's equally normal waning interest in sex, after menopause (or for some, after childbirth). I'm not sure why that's fair.
Implicit in monogamy is the idea that one’s spouse will engage in a reasonable amount of sex. No one views marriage as a potential vow of celibacy at someone else’s discretion.
At someone else's discretion? Do you think there are a lot of people out there who choose to lose interest in sex without a legitimate reason? W
Implicit in marriage is the concept of for better or for worse. Where is the empathy for these people?
Anybody with a "legitimate reason for no sex" should divorce. If your partner is so horrible as to not want sex, clearly you must leave them.
Your statement "for better of for worse" applies equally to the rejected partner who seeks sex elsewhere.... no big deal right? Sex isn't important right? Otherwise you'd be having it right? So they are sleeping around: deal with it. For better or for worse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most people don't get married realizing the sex will decrease significantly. Seriously?
This is a well known trope though.
See: any Woody Allen movie ever made. Lol
I'm absolutely not going to take relationship advice from Woody Allen!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Probably for the same reason I got married think my DH would always be fun, loving, and do his fair share. Now he’s too tired and stressed for any of that.
And who wants to have sex with that?
If he's unwilling to change it's a big problem. Most of the people complaining about the low sex are probably the cause of it imo. If counseling won't help or the person won't make changes it's probably better to divorce.
Anonymous wrote:Probably for the same reason I got married think my DH would always be fun, loving, and do his fair share. Now he’s too tired and stressed for any of that.