Anonymous wrote:What happened to U Chicago? It is the only one that dropped out of the 3rd place tie of last year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Washington University in St. Louis?
The best private school in the midwest other than Northwestern, and has been for generations.
Anonymous wrote:Vermont and Miami of Ohio are dismally ranked Public Ivies.
UT-Austin and UW-Madison seem really undervalued. William and Mary is just an odd fit. Never thought I’d see the day Wake Forest overtook UVA. No serious person thinks Wake Forest is a better school than UVA. George Mason is still up and coming very very slowly.
Anonymous wrote:What is Washington University in St. Louis?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vermont and Miami of Ohio are dismally ranked Public Ivies.
UT-Austin and UW-Madison seem really undervalued. William and Mary is just an odd fit. Never thought I’d see the day Wake Forest overtook UVA. No serious person thinks Wake Forest is a better school than UVA. George Mason is still up and coming very very slowly.
UW-Madison suffered at the hands of GOP Gov. Walker, but now with a dem Gov., things should get back on track.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crickets. Where are the UVA boosters? Congrats to Michigan pushing UVA out.
UVA and W&M really dropped. Big change in just one year.
UVA’s is not what one hopes for, but no big deal. W&M’s, however, is a BIG problem.
W&M is always a "weird" school for rankings because it's grouped with national universities because it is public and has a handful of grad programs, but its aims are more like a SLAC with its focus on undergraduate teaching/research. But as a public institution it doesn't have the flexibility/resources of equivalent private SLACs (e.g., it has to take 2/3 in-state, it can't raise tuition without state approval, it can't make financial changes/adaptations without state approval). Whenever the formulas of rankings change, W&M is a bit more susceptible due to its "weirdness." I think dropping selectivity as a metric, and lessening the relative importance of SAT scores in overall formula is what hurt W&M's ranking here.
Anonymous wrote:Vermont and Miami of Ohio are dismally ranked Public Ivies.
UT-Austin and UW-Madison seem really undervalued. William and Mary is just an odd fit. Never thought I’d see the day Wake Forest overtook UVA. No serious person thinks Wake Forest is a better school than UVA. George Mason is still up and coming very very slowly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crickets. Where are the UVA boosters? Congrats to Michigan pushing UVA out.
UVA and W&M really dropped. Big change in just one year.
UVA’s is not what one hopes for, but no big deal. W&M’s, however, is a BIG problem.
Anonymous wrote:These rankings won't affect UVA applications...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crickets. Where are the UVA boosters? Congrats to Michigan pushing UVA out.
Sorry your kid didn’t get in.
Didn’t apply. Not a VA resident. He got into one of the top 10 though.
Why the chip on the shoulder then?
Anonymous wrote:Moving up a few spots at the higher levels is a bigger deal than at the lower levels. It's just harder to do that. Look at ND, which went from 18 to 15. Wonder what propelled them?