Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Harvard 15. 10 others were missed or didn't report to the list.
There were 12 MIT admits this year , which is roughly on the same level as other years. However, 5 rejected MIT opting for other schools, including all 4 girls admitted.
I don't doubt your info but as a parent of a senior, even I didn't know who was going where, much less know specific numbers of admits vs matriculation.
I don't think the counselors themselves know exact # of admits if the kids don't tell, how then would you know?
By my count, survey is reporting 306 kids out of 421 or 25% of the class did not report their destination for public consumption.
I wonder why the survey is incomplete. Is this something else the principal tried to put an end to?
I doubt it. It probably has more to do with school ending earlier in the year now and the student newspapers having less time to send reminders or chase down responses.
People sitting on Ivy waitlists, or any waitlists, people keeping their colleges private since this is posted online, seniors who don’t GAF...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Harvard 15. 10 others were missed or didn't report to the list.
There were 12 MIT admits this year , which is roughly on the same level as other years. However, 5 rejected MIT opting for other schools, including all 4 girls admitted.
I don't doubt your info but as a parent of a senior, even I didn't know who was going where, much less know specific numbers of admits vs matriculation.
I don't think the counselors themselves know exact # of admits if the kids don't tell, how then would you know?
By my count, survey is reporting 306 kids out of 421 or 25% of the class did not report their destination for public consumption.
I wonder why the survey is incomplete. Is this something else the principal tried to put an end to?
I doubt it. It probably has more to do with school ending earlier in the year now and the student newspapers having less time to send reminders or chase down responses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Harvard 15. 10 others were missed or didn't report to the list.
There were 12 MIT admits this year , which is roughly on the same level as other years. However, 5 rejected MIT opting for other schools, including all 4 girls admitted.
I don't doubt your info but as a parent of a senior, even I didn't know who was going where, much less know specific numbers of admits vs matriculation.
I don't think the counselors themselves know exact # of admits if the kids don't tell, how then would you know?
By my count, survey is reporting 306 kids out of 421 or 25% of the class did not report their destination for public consumption.
I wonder why the survey is incomplete. Is this something else the principal tried to put an end to?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A pretty impressive list this year (even to hardcore anti-TJ'ers). I believe these are matriculants, not admittees. Here is a partial list:
Berkley 8
Chicago 8
Columbia 2
Cornell 13
Duke 4
Harvard 5
MIT 7
Michigan 14
Penn 3
Princeton 4
Stanford 3
Washington University (St. Louis) 4
Williams 2
Yale 5
Still unimpressed the number one question remains if these kids would have remained at their base schools what would happened
I would argue for most at TJ they would have gotten better results from base schools
Even with this top 25% or so list
Tufts
CMU (Engineering/CS)
Grinnell
UICU
GA Tech
And as a TJ parent, I know my kids long term results would not have been as good out of a base school. TJ sends kids to College— be it Harvard or UVA who are over prepared and find college easy after TJ. On some campuses, including UVA, TJ kids have the #1 GPA out of all US school with at least 10 kids on campus. Even if my kid could have gotten into the exact same college out of a base school, my kid will do better in college than they would out of a base school. That counts for a lot for kids who will likely continue past undergrad.
All you have experience is TJ. Again my argument is your kid would have had a similar experience in a top section at their base schools
P.S. in the real world no one cares about GPA
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A pretty impressive list this year (even to hardcore anti-TJ'ers). I believe these are matriculants, not admittees. Here is a partial list:
Berkley 8
Chicago 8
Columbia 2
Cornell 13
Duke 4
Harvard 5
MIT 7
Michigan 14
Penn 3
Princeton 4
Stanford 3
Washington University (St. Louis) 4
Williams 2
Yale 5
Still unimpressed the number one question remains if these kids would have remained at their base schools what would happened
I would argue for most at TJ they would have gotten better results from base schools
Even with this top 25% or so list
Tufts
CMU (Engineering/CS)
Grinnell
UICU
GA Tech
And as a TJ parent, I know my kids long term results would not have been as good out of a base school. TJ sends kids to College— be it Harvard or UVA who are over prepared and find college easy after TJ. On some campuses, including UVA, TJ kids have the #1 GPA out of all US school with at least 10 kids on campus. Even if my kid could have gotten into the exact same college out of a base school, my kid will do better in college than they would out of a base school. That counts for a lot for kids who will likely continue past undergrad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about HSs like Chantilly, Oakton. Any destination data available for other FCPS HSs?
No one cares about those schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Harvard 15. 10 others were missed or didn't report to the list.
There were 12 MIT admits this year , which is roughly on the same level as other years. However, 5 rejected MIT opting for other schools, including all 4 girls admitted.
I don't doubt your info but as a parent of a senior, even I didn't know who was going where, much less know specific numbers of admits vs matriculation.
I don't think the counselors themselves know exact # of admits if the kids don't tell, how then would you know?
By my count, survey is reporting 306 kids out of 421 or 25% of the class did not report their destination for public consumption.
I wonder why the survey is incomplete. Is this something else the principal tried to put an end to?
Anonymous wrote:What about HSs like Chantilly, Oakton. Any destination data available for other FCPS HSs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is the link for class of 2018 if you want to get some idea:
https://tjhsst.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/media/inline-files/TJProfile1819.pdf
Unimpressive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People ascribe bad motives to OP because DCUM is full of TJ hate. And her story makes no sense.
Why doesn't it make sense? Her DD feels awkward asking, so OP tried to see if she could find out.
On an anonymous forum?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A pretty impressive list this year (even to hardcore anti-TJ'ers). I believe these are matriculants, not admittees. Here is a partial list:
Berkley 8
Chicago 8
Columbia 2
Cornell 13
Duke 4
Harvard 5
MIT 7
Michigan 14
Penn 3
Princeton 4
Stanford 3
Washington University (St. Louis) 4
Williams 2
Yale 5
Still unimpressed the number one question remains if these kids would have remained at their base schools what would happened
I would argue for most at TJ they would have gotten better results from base schools
Even with this top 25% or so list
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Harvard 15. 10 others were missed or didn't report to the list.
There were 12 MIT admits this year , which is roughly on the same level as other years. However, 5 rejected MIT opting for other schools, including all 4 girls admitted.
I don't doubt your info but as a parent of a senior, even I didn't know who was going where, much less know specific numbers of admits vs matriculation.
I don't think the counselors themselves know exact # of admits if the kids don't tell, how then would you know?
By my count, survey is reporting 306 kids out of 421 or 25% of the class did not report their destination for public consumption.
Those numbers were from one of TJ parents' social media circle, which in turn was sourced from their TJ students.
I thought they were looking at the link, which is TJ today.
Info in that link is incomplete.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Harvard 15. 10 others were missed or didn't report to the list.
There were 12 MIT admits this year , which is roughly on the same level as other years. However, 5 rejected MIT opting for other schools, including all 4 girls admitted.
I don't doubt your info but as a parent of a senior, even I didn't know who was going where, much less know specific numbers of admits vs matriculation.
I don't think the counselors themselves know exact # of admits if the kids don't tell, how then would you know?
By my count, survey is reporting 306 kids out of 421 or 25% of the class did not report their destination for public consumption.