Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP - I greatly respect all religions. But when Jesus was crucified that was a very public event that did occur. He did get documented in a census. He was a figure in history.
Not doubting other religions. Amazing that folks don't realize he was a living person. Not saying they should believe in any religious aspect of Jesus
Sounds like you've been reading the Bible or listening to your minister, but not looking at academic sources. There is no documentation of a census or a crucifixion with many people attending. These are stories in the Bible - not documented fact.
Check Wikipedia for info on the census mentioned in the Bible: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_of_Quirinius
Do you get all your information from collaborative, anonymous sources from openly editable websites? I guess DCUM is about the same.
Not really -- Unlike DCUM, Wikipedia is moderated to assure accuracy and also cites other sources. DCUM is a chat board. It does not purport accuracy -- it is conversation.
Without wishing to pick a fight with you about Wikipedia, but are you aware that wiki has sites from other countries? In their languages? If I look up Nikola Tesla I can see on wiki.org that he was a Serbian-American scientist. If I look at wiki.sr(Serbia) it says one of most famous Serbian and world inventors. If I look up Croatian wiki, it says he was a Croatian/American scientist... and adds by origin Serbian from Croatia. This is where correction comes, which is better than politicians who claim he was the greatest son of Croatia and full on Croat. Whose house they burned twice, whose extended family escaped to mountains in Bosnia because they were Orthodox Serbs, and during WWII Croatian Ustasha state had concentration camps to exterminate Serbs, Jews and Roma people. Not Nazi Germans, Croatians. Today they are trying to bury that memory and claim Croats were the ones that were killed by Ustashas. Holocaust museum in NY has the figure of 350K killed by Croats in WWII. This is why Serbs went nuts in 1990s and hence committed ethnic cleansing themselves, with a slogan never again. Now, Croats did kill in 1990s Serbs too and Muslims, BBC footage follows them shooting old men who didn't want to leave their homes in Croatia, BBC also shows Serbs plain killing Muslims while goading them that they will be safe. Serbian wiki writes nothing of Serbian crimes, Croatian wiki writes nothing of Croatian crimes. We can't trust wiki, but it does try to moderate when it can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP - I greatly respect all religions. But when Jesus was crucified that was a very public event that did occur. He did get documented in a census. He was a figure in history.
Not doubting other religions. Amazing that folks don't realize he was a living person. Not saying they should believe in any religious aspect of Jesus
Sounds like you've been reading the Bible or listening to your minister, but not looking at academic sources. There is no documentation of a census or a crucifixion with many people attending. These are stories in the Bible - not documented fact.
Check Wikipedia for info on the census mentioned in the Bible: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_of_Quirinius
Do you get all your information from collaborative, anonymous sources from openly editable websites? I guess DCUM is about the same.
Not really -- Unlike DCUM, Wikipedia is moderated to assure accuracy and also cites other sources. DCUM is a chat board. It does not purport accuracy -- it is conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are documented accounts of Jesus as early as the first century. Scholars at the time did not debate his existence. But I suppose if you’re an atheist on here no answer is good enough so it’s an easy way to pile it on.
I have no issue with research that Jesus was a historical person. That does appear to be fairly well accepted by scholars. But obviously, that he likely existed says nothing at all about anything else.
Anonymous wrote:There are documented accounts of Jesus as early as the first century. Scholars at the time did not debate his existence. But I suppose if you’re an atheist on here no answer is good enough so it’s an easy way to pile it on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL if this is a troll post it is a pretty clever one... traps for almost all camps.
Yes, daily/weekly christian bashing thread
more of a Hindu bashing thread.
Maybe dual bashing- since Jesus didn’t exist and all so Christianity has been debunked by Dcum’s finest
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LOL if this is a troll post it is a pretty clever one... traps for almost all camps.
Yes, daily/weekly christian bashing thread
more of a Hindu bashing thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP - I greatly respect all religions. But when Jesus was crucified that was a very public event that did occur. He did get documented in a census. He was a figure in history.
Not doubting other religions. Amazing that folks don't realize he was a living person. Not saying they should believe in any religious aspect of Jesus
Sounds like you've been reading the Bible or listening to your minister, but not looking at academic sources. There is no documentation of a census or a crucifixion with many people attending. These are stories in the Bible - not documented fact.
Check Wikipedia for info on the census mentioned in the Bible: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_of_Quirinius
Do you get all your information from collaborative, anonymous sources from openly editable websites? I guess DCUM is about the same.
Anonymous wrote:There’s no reliable evidence of Jesus’s existence so they’re not wrong.
- Jew Buddhist
Anonymous wrote:I have a great respect for the Eastern Religions - Hinduism, Buddhism and Shintoism. I think they were more spiritually evolved.
The abrahamic religions are the religions of strife. Maybe because their basis is not spiritualism and they claim that they are superior. It is their way or the highway. Most of the strife in the world today is perpetuated by the followers of these three religions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP - I greatly respect all religions. But when Jesus was crucified that was a very public event that did occur. He did get documented in a census. He was a figure in history.
Not doubting other religions. Amazing that folks don't realize he was a living person. Not saying they should believe in any religious aspect of Jesus
Sounds like you've been reading the Bible or listening to your minister, but not looking at academic sources. There is no documentation of a census or a crucifixion with many people attending. These are stories in the Bible - not documented fact.
Check Wikipedia for info on the census mentioned in the Bible: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_of_Quirinius
Do you get all your information from collaborative, anonymous sources from openly editable websites? I guess DCUM is about the same.
So let me get this straight. I'm supposed to believe that Jesus was actually a historical figure, but transubstantiation does not mean that Catholics think the host and wine are literally the body of christ? I grew up extremely Catholic and am now very confused. Which leads me to believe that you are suffering a bit from Dunning-Kruger. How about spend a little more time learning about Hinduism, and less time criticizing people of other faiths for not knowing about your faith?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You do realize that centuries after the fact, we cannot be sure of this?
millennia actually. And the fact that christianity wasn't even really conceived of until a few centuries later proves how ridic it all is.