Both of you above are being obnoxious and dense. It’s not about her overall image, just look at her skin.

Anonymous wrote:Literally everyone on this thread. I guarantee you RIGHT NOW that if you are over 30 years old, you have more wrinkles on your face than Warren. Literally don't care how she did it, but it's baller.

Not sure why you’re pushing the “Elizabeth Warren looks young” agenda so hard. She looks like any old lady.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Warren looks so young for her age. As I don't believe she is only in the 40's, I went online to check her age. She is 70! Both her face and neck are no-wrinkle free! It's just amazing!

No.

She looks like an asexual grandma. Nothing more, nothing less.

No one thinks she’s flashy or hot, were saying she’s aged well. These can be two different things. Kamala is more attractive yet she has more wrinkles and more sagging than 70 year old Warren. Not that this matters, I know. Some of us are just impressed because we see our skin changing too.

Literally everyone on this thread. I guarantee you RIGHT NOW that if you are over 30 years old, you have more wrinkles on your face than Warren. Literally don't care how she did it, but it's baller.

She definitely looks better than Hillary (younger, more energetic, less wrinkles and more fit). But her look overall is so bland and unattractive. There is nothing feminine about her. She has no style that reflects her personality.

You people must all look horrible for your age.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Warren looks so young for her age. As I don't believe she is only in the 40's, I went online to check her age. She is 70! Both her face and neck are no-wrinkle free! It's just amazing!

No.

She looks like an asexual grandma. Nothing more, nothing less.

Ha! Her look drives me nuts too! So bland.

Anonymous wrote:Watching the debate now. She’s definitely had a facelift and neck lift. There’s no way her skin can be that naturally amazing at her age. Yes, her overall look is not youthful but she has fewer wrinkles and less sagging than most 50 year olds I know.

I honestly think people age differently. I’ve meet women who don’t have a lot of wrinkles and saggy skin at 70. My mom’s skin started to stag around 75, with very few wrinkles. Please note lack of wrinkles does not mean someone looks 20 years younger, it just means they have good genes.

I should add my mom is Latina with golden tan skin.

I disagree with her politics but she looks great. I think she's very pretty and always looks so well put together.

Watching the debate now. She’s definitely had a facelift and neck lift. There’s no way her skin can be that naturally amazing at her age. Yes, her overall look is not youthful but she has fewer wrinkles and less sagging than most 50 year olds I know.

Anonymous wrote:Warren looks so young for her age. As I don't believe she is only in the 40's, I went online to check her age. She is 70! Both her face and neck are no-wrinkle free! It's just amazing!

No.

She looks like an asexual grandma. Nothing more, nothing less.

She's looked 69 years old since she was 20

Anonymous wrote:Compared to law school 30 years ago, she's definitely aged.

You went to law school with her or you attended Harvard?

Warren looks so young for her age. As I don't believe she is only in the 40's, I went online to check her age. She is 70! Both her face and neck are no-wrinkle free! It's just amazing!

She definitely looks like she could be in her 50s. Be real with yourselves ladies in their 50s and 60s don't usually look this good. She is fit and her face skin not only has a good texture but her face and neck are young looking. Attractive or not is a different convo