Anonymous
05/07/2019 16:20
Subject: Re:375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.
He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.
Why are you defending a criminal president?
Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.
AG’s letter explicitly states it.
Actually it does. Did you read it?
Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!
Case closed.
Only if you don't know how to read.
The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
— William P. Barr, letter to Lindsey Graham, Dianne Feinstein, Doug Collins, and Jerrold Nadler, 24 Mar. 2019
Anonymous
05/07/2019 16:17
Subject: Re:375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.
He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.
Why are you defending a criminal president?
Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.
AG’s letter explicitly states it.
Actually it does. Did you read it?
Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!
Case closed.
Anonymous
05/07/2019 16:00
Subject: 375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arguing with a Trump supporter is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon will simply shit on the board and strut around like it won.
I love you.
LOL, the fact that you guys think this letter is so meaningful is because, to carry forward the above analogy, you lost a chess game to a pigeon and have decided to complain about it. And now the pigeon just sh*t on your complaint.
Keep it at it. It is better to deal with defeat and disappointment in private.
Anonymous
05/07/2019 15:56
Subject: 375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Arguing with a Trump supporter is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon will simply shit on the board and strut around like it won.
I love you.
Anonymous
05/07/2019 15:45
Subject: 375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Arguing with a Trump supporter is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon will simply shit on the board and strut around like it won.
Haha. Very true.
Anonymous
05/07/2019 15:18
Subject: 375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
They are wrong.
Case closed.
Case closed.
Anonymous
05/07/2019 11:37
Subject: Re:375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.
He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.
Why are you defending a criminal president?
Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.
AG’s letter explicitly states it.
Actually it does. Did you read it?
Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!
Until we hear from Mueller, we only have Barr's version of events. Gee, I wonder why he wasn't willing to share the contemparaneous notes from said call?
Anonymous
05/07/2019 11:14
Subject: 375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Arguing with a Trump supporter is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon will simply shit on the board and strut around like it won.
Anonymous
05/07/2019 11:00
Subject: Re:375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.
He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.
Why are you defending a criminal president?
Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.
AG’s letter explicitly states it.
Actually it does. Did you read it?
Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!
+1 No one has exonerated Trump.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/news-trend-watch/b...s-not-exonerate-trump-20190324
Why are people looking up exonerate?
Exonerate was our top lookup on March 24th, 2019, following the word’s appearance in a letter written by William Barr, US Attorney General, summarizing the findings of the report recently concluded by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
— William P. Barr, letter to Lindsey Graham, Dianne Feinstein, Doug Collins, and Jerrold Nadler, 24 Mar. 2019
You consider your ignorance moot?
Anonymous
05/07/2019 10:57
Subject: Re:375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.
He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.
Why are you defending a criminal president?
Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.
AG’s letter explicitly states it.
Actually it does. Did you read it?
Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!
You consider your ignorance moot?
Anonymous
05/07/2019 10:48
Subject: Re:375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.
He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.
Why are you defending a criminal president?
Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.
AG’s letter explicitly states it.
Actually it does. Did you read it?
Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!
Geez, even Barr said it did not exonerate him, which the report also says.
Anonymous
05/07/2019 10:44
Subject: Re:375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.
He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.
Why are you defending a criminal president?
Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.
AG’s letter explicitly states it.
Actually it does. Did you read it?
Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!
Anonymous
05/07/2019 10:43
Subject: 375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All the more reason he's determined to "win" by whatever means in 2020.
+1
I really thought he had a chance in 2016, and I was right, although I kept that belief to myself.
I don't think he stands a chance now. There are too many fooled by him who won't ever go back.
Anonymous
05/07/2019 10:37
Subject: Re:375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.
He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.
Why are you defending a criminal president?
Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.
AG’s letter explicitly states it.
Actually it does. Did you read it?
Anonymous
05/07/2019 10:35
Subject: Re:375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.
He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.
Why are you defending a criminal president?
Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.
AG’s letter explicitly states it.
AG letter is factually misleading, as Barr uses just a handful of words, out of context from the full report and draws his own (wrong) conclusions. Read the report for yourself and stop watching FOX.