Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://driving-tests.org/driving-statistics/
42% of the surveyed drivers said they don’t consider going 10 mph over the speed limit to be speeding. Another 10% said they don’t think a 20 mph increase is speeding. (Everquote, 2016) Drivers speed at least 10 mph more than half of the time. (Everquote, 2016) (Source: https://driving-tests.org/driving-statistics/)
So what? The speed limits are for everyone's safety and not imaginary numbers. The faster people go the more accidents especially in urban areas and on beltway-like highways.
Anonymous wrote:https://driving-tests.org/driving-statistics/
42% of the surveyed drivers said they don’t consider going 10 mph over the speed limit to be speeding. Another 10% said they don’t think a 20 mph increase is speeding. (Everquote, 2016) Drivers speed at least 10 mph more than half of the time. (Everquote, 2016) (Source: https://driving-tests.org/driving-statistics/)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Listen, people are not using them as alternatives to cars, that’s a false ideology on a grand scale and a marketing scheme to try to excuse a business from dumping their product on the streets with no license, no regulation, and no upkeep.
There is a study in Portland showing they are used as alternatives to cars.
No one is commuting on them on the regular.
I see people in business clothes on them in DC regularly on weekdays.
Sorry you don’t like the look of parked cars, Its as valid a concern as not liking the look of scooters.
but cars are docked or else they’re towed. I can’t park my car in the middle of the sidewalk, bike path, in your yard, on a trash can, in the middle of the street.
You park your car in one of the zillion parking spaces you are given out of the public right of way. If we gave scooters designated places to park on the side of the street, as ubiquitous as car parking is, we would not have a scooter parking problem.
Sorry you are trying to explain to handicap people what kind of standard they need to meet for you to have them be justified in their complaints. Do you ask the same of minorities when they complain about race issues? You need to check yourself on that.
If handicapped people (but this is DCUM, I have no idea if you are really handicapped) want to remove a source of mobility for others, they can expect people to argue back. Just as if I want cars banned because someone I know suffered permanent disability due to one I would expect people to argue back.
I know who you are now, you wrote the same thing on Justin Wilson's facebook page (but out of respect for DCUM I won't post your name). You are one of those uber bike fans, all bikes only your way, or nothing else at all, everyone else is wrong, and you really don't care about handicap people (except blind cyclists on Quaker/Seminary road). Shame on you, gain some perspective on others, and stop citing the same thing everywhere because you are outted man.
lol, I know who this is as well. He is really obnoxious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are you even talking about? You can find a “study” that will tell you whatever you want. Throwing some NYTimes blog from 11 years ago isn’t really convincing. But good for you, you did it!
I see no evidence the percentage of speeders has declined recently, and there are multiple studies confirming the finding.
Man, living with you must be rough.
The classic DCUM move, when you are confronted with facts, go ad hominem and irrelevant.
Perhaps I am rough to live with. You are still wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Listen, people are not using them as alternatives to cars, that’s a false ideology on a grand scale and a marketing scheme to try to excuse a business from dumping their product on the streets with no license, no regulation, and no upkeep.
There is a study in Portland showing they are used as alternatives to cars.
No one is commuting on them on the regular.
I see people in business clothes on them in DC regularly on weekdays.
Sorry you don’t like the look of parked cars, Its as valid a concern as not liking the look of scooters.
but cars are docked or else they’re towed. I can’t park my car in the middle of the sidewalk, bike path, in your yard, on a trash can, in the middle of the street.
You park your car in one of the zillion parking spaces you are given out of the public right of way. If we gave scooters designated places to park on the side of the street, as ubiquitous as car parking is, we would not have a scooter parking problem.
Sorry you are trying to explain to handicap people what kind of standard they need to meet for you to have them be justified in their complaints. Do you ask the same of minorities when they complain about race issues? You need to check yourself on that.
If handicapped people (but this is DCUM, I have no idea if you are really handicapped) want to remove a source of mobility for others, they can expect people to argue back. Just as if I want cars banned because someone I know suffered permanent disability due to one I would expect people to argue back.
I know who you are now, you wrote the same thing on Justin Wilson's facebook page (but out of respect for DCUM I won't post your name). You are one of those uber bike fans, all bikes only your way, or nothing else at all, everyone else is wrong, and you really don't care about handicap people (except blind cyclists on Quaker/Seminary road). Shame on you, gain some perspective on others, and stop citing the same thing everywhere because you are outted man.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Omg you are going to be so surprised when you learn how bad cars are for health, safety, the environment, and more.
I bet you’ll be super ranty about that because I’m sure you’re not hypocritical at all.
But drivers of cars follow the law (for the most part, you know what I mean) - they stay in their lanes, they don't go the wrong way down a one-way street, they don't park in randomly created spaces that block entry/egress, they stop at lights and stop signs, and the drivers are licensed and have had training before drivers are allowed on the streets.
Almost all drivers speed. Most jurisdictions won't even ticket for speeding until the driver is 10MPH over the limit - but yes, going one mph over the limit is breaking the law. Large numbers of drivers run reds, run stops, make right turns on red without stopping, make illegal U turns, change lanes dangerously, make turns from an improper lane or go straight from a turn only lane. Fail to yield to pedestrians where required, fail to use turn signals. That does not even get into blocking crosswalks or parking in bike lanes.
All this in big fast vehicles that can and regulalry DO kill.
OMG. I specifically said "you know what I mean" but apparently you don't. The majority - the vast, vast, vast majority of drivers follow the rules of the road. As there are no rules of the road for the scooters it is chaotic and dangerous out there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are you even talking about? You can find a “study” that will tell you whatever you want. Throwing some NYTimes blog from 11 years ago isn’t really convincing. But good for you, you did it!
I see no evidence the percentage of speeders has declined recently, and there are multiple studies confirming the finding.
Man, living with you must be rough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Omg you are going to be so surprised when you learn how bad cars are for health, safety, the environment, and more.
I bet you’ll be super ranty about that because I’m sure you’re not hypocritical at all.
But drivers of cars follow the law (for the most part, you know what I mean) - they stay in their lanes, they don't go the wrong way down a one-way street, they don't park in randomly created spaces that block entry/egress, they stop at lights and stop signs, and the drivers are licensed and have had training before drivers are allowed on the streets.
Almost all drivers speed. Most jurisdictions won't even ticket for speeding until the driver is 10MPH over the limit - but yes, going one mph over the limit is breaking the law. Large numbers of drivers run reds, run stops, make right turns on red without stopping, make illegal U turns, change lanes dangerously, make turns from an improper lane or go straight from a turn only lane. Fail to yield to pedestrians where required, fail to use turn signals. That does not even get into blocking crosswalks or parking in bike lanes.
All this in big fast vehicles that can and regulalry DO kill.
Did you get these “statistics” from your Portland study? “Almost all” “most jurisdictions” “large number of drivers”.
You don't need statistics to know what the PP stated above is true. You only need eyes. I'm mostly a pedestrian and I see drivers making grievous errors every day, all the time.
I am also mostly a pedestrian. Which is precisely why we don't *also* need people making grievous errors on sidewalks and trails every day, all the time, with scooters. It's one place where it should be pretty safe, and where pedestrians shouldn't have to worry about something with a motor rolling up behind them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are you even talking about? You can find a “study” that will tell you whatever you want. Throwing some NYTimes blog from 11 years ago isn’t really convincing. But good for you, you did it!
I see no evidence the percentage of speeders has declined recently, and there are multiple studies confirming the finding.