Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would argue that based on ranked teams, players playing at major DI programs and coaching talent that McLean and Bethesda are probably the best programs.

BRYC’s portfolio of D1 players past and future is very impressive too.

Relative to McLean's its not that impressive IMO
The 2014 class certainly was impressive and the 03s have the potential for similar, but beyond that its OK but nothing special.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They do have a strong group of DI players but no on he same level as McLean which has a half dozen girls playing Top 25 DI programs including powers such as UNC, UVA, Georgetown and Penn State.

Does McLean add players at the older ages? Their 06’s are struggling. What about BRYC?

06’s are struggling because they can’t find the right coach. They already had players leave mid year. BRYC 06 is a tad better than MYS. Not sure what your looking for, but Loudon seems to have a stronger team and so does VDA. Unless you’re coming from one of those clubs. In that’s case Strength along with winning comes and goes. You can never go wrong with MYC or BRYC.

Arlington 06 is a very good team that’s the team you want your 06 playing for and they have a fantastic coach

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They do have a strong group of DI players but no on he same level as McLean which has a half dozen girls playing Top 25 DI programs including powers such as UNC, UVA, Georgetown and Penn State.

Does McLean add players at the older ages? Their 06’s are struggling. What about BRYC?

06’s are struggling because they can’t find the right coach. They already had players leave mid year. BRYC 06 is a tad better than MYS. Not sure what your looking for, but Loudon seems to have a stronger team and so does VDA. Unless you’re coming from one of those clubs. In that’s case Strength along with winning comes and goes. You can never go wrong with MYC or BRYC.

Anonymous wrote:They do have a strong group of DI players but no on he same level as McLean which has a half dozen girls playing Top 25 DI programs including powers such as UNC, UVA, Georgetown and Penn State.

Does McLean add players at the older ages? Their 06’s are struggling. What about BRYC?

They do have a strong group of DI players but no on he same level as McLean which has a half dozen girls playing Top 25 DI programs including powers such as UNC, UVA, Georgetown and Penn State.

Anonymous wrote:I would argue that based on ranked teams, players playing at major DI programs and coaching talent that McLean and Bethesda are probably the best programs.

BRYC’s portfolio of D1 players past and future is very impressive too.

I would argue that based on ranked teams, players playing at major DI programs and coaching talent that McLean and Bethesda are probably the best programs.

I think the better quote is

Alright, Mr. DeMille, I'm ready for my close-up.

Anonymous wrote:There can ONLY be ONE!

Sorry, but the correct line is: there can be ONLY ONE.

There can ONLY be ONE!

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but what is VDA?

GO TO THE ONE NEAR YOU

Sorry, but what is VDA?

Anonymous wrote:There is already factual information provided to help answer the OP's question a few pages back. Read it and use this in making your decision. You'll recognize it for its fair and balanced presentation of information. All other posts here are biased, not based in fact, and manipulative. Good luck in deciding.

Standings are online. Use those. Check out next year’s coaches and good luck.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The score from the recent u13 game between BRYC and VDA was 1-2; hardly a “clobber”.

VDA U13 is #1 in Mid-Atlantic

VDA U14 is #2 and clobbered BRYC 5-1

On a shrunken field. BRYC painted new lines for the game to make the field smaller. It almost worked in the 06 game.

+1

I call BS. They painted new lines?

When BRYC plays at Robinson, games are either played in the stadium, on Robinson upper (something like 120x85, slightly larger than FIFA regulation), or Robinson upper (at 120x70 for the youngest age groups, or if mud has made the player's touch line dangerous). All of them are regulation sized fields. The stadium is the smallest of the options. All fields are as big or bigger than the fields at Jeff Cup, ECNL Showcases, and ECNL Nationals.

Disgruntled VDA patent who apparently didn't win "enough" is just being misleading. And an ass, to boot.

There is already factual information provided to help answer the OP's question a few pages back. Read it and use this in making your decision. You'll recognize it for its fair and balanced presentation of information. All other posts here are biased, not based in fact, and manipulative. Good luck in deciding.