Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My older daughter is very smart, but didn't get into CES either. However, we plan to do our own version of CES at home. There are plenty of home schooling resources available that meet or even exceed what CES teaches. As much as it may be bragging rights, CES doesn't really matter in the long run. Kids can still take AP classes in high school, skip grades if they can test out of the material, etc... Also, there are plenty of coding and robotics camps during the summer, lots and lots of educational toys at a reasonable cost (e.g., robotics kits, game programming tutorials).
The only real difference that I see between CES and non-CES students is that enrichment comes from parents for the latter kids.
If your kid got in, would you still have made the statement that CES doesn’t matter in the long run? The problem with most of you whose kids didn’t get into the the CES is you’re licking each others’ wounds and devaluating the prestige of being in the CES. Do yourselves a huge favor, and teach your kids to give credit where credit is due! The kids who made it to the CES deserve to be praised and uplifted instead of being doubted! To make up stories like some parents pulled strings to get their kids in is just plain stupid!!!
Parents like you are what makes the CES insufferable! Unfortunately, there is one too many parents (and aptly their children) who think like you, and it's just pathetic. Hopefully the apple falls very far away from the tree if you have a child at a CES.
FWIW, I have a child who does pretty well at a CES, but I would never for a second think he is gifted or somehow more deserving of the CES spot than some of his peers at the local school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Test orientation is important for sure. A friend told me that her kid got 6% MCPS and 40's% National, and was shocked about those numbers when receiving the letter. The kid got all A's and MAP's at 85%tile. She was very concerned not because her kid did not get in, but something went wrong with her. I am very sympathetic and not sure how to help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP tried gaming the system. Now he/she regretted that he/she did not do enough. What a joke!
+1. You nailed it.
Buying one COGAT prep book is considered gaming the system? Are you people nuts? Do you also consider the kid who takes musical instrument lessons and gets picked for the orchestra or the kid who takes soccer/tennis lessons and gets picked for the team as gaming the system? Because only kids who have never prepared or trained should be considered to identify the truly gifted tennis player?
To be fair, MCPS shall provide every student a COGAT prep book.
Your peer cohort at home school has way more withthing to get in to CES than a top cogay score.
Prep has minimal if any impact on the cogat screener that was the whole point so probably not a good use of anyone's time.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is a high performer in his school (which has very smart kids in general). His MAP scores and grades are great (all As and 99 percentile). He says he is quite bored with the 3rd grade material so I was hoping he would make it into CES but he didn't. We didn't send him to any prep classes - did get him one of those COGAT books to work on and he seemed to do great. But now I am regretting not helping him prep further - I am really conflicted about it because on the one hand, I know some kids who are smart but not really gifted but did a lot of prep and got in. On the other hand, maybe prepping them to get in defeats the purpose of CES!
The question I have is how do you get your kids in local school to be competitive in middle and high school if there is such a gap in instruction right from grade 4 between them and the CES kids. I keep reading on these boards how much work the 5th grade kids do in CES --- can some of the parents whose kids didn't make it to CES but got into magnets in middle/high school and/or got into top colleges comment?
I am actually surprised I am feeling bad about this but it may be because my kid is feeling some sting of the rejection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My older daughter is very smart, but didn't get into CES either. However, we plan to do our own version of CES at home. There are plenty of home schooling resources available that meet or even exceed what CES teaches. As much as it may be bragging rights, CES doesn't really matter in the long run. Kids can still take AP classes in high school, skip grades if they can test out of the material, etc... Also, there are plenty of coding and robotics camps during the summer, lots and lots of educational toys at a reasonable cost (e.g., robotics kits, game programming tutorials).
The only real difference that I see between CES and non-CES students is that enrichment comes from parents for the latter kids.
If your kid got in, would you still have made the statement that CES doesn’t matter in the long run? The problem with most of you whose kids didn’t get into the the CES is you’re licking each others’ wounds and devaluating the prestige of being in the CES. Do yourselves a huge favor, and teach your kids to give credit where credit is due! The kids who made it to the CES deserve to be praised and uplifted instead of being doubted! To make up stories like some parents pulled strings to get their kids in is just plain stupid!!!
In the long run of life - I doubt very much it matters. Great for the kids who got in - but not a huge detriment to those who didn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My older daughter is very smart, but didn't get into CES either. However, we plan to do our own version of CES at home. There are plenty of home schooling resources available that meet or even exceed what CES teaches. As much as it may be bragging rights, CES doesn't really matter in the long run. Kids can still take AP classes in high school, skip grades if they can test out of the material, etc... Also, there are plenty of coding and robotics camps during the summer, lots and lots of educational toys at a reasonable cost (e.g., robotics kits, game programming tutorials).
The only real difference that I see between CES and non-CES students is that enrichment comes from parents for the latter kids.
If your kid got in, would you still have made the statement that CES doesn’t matter in the long run? The problem with most of you whose kids didn’t get into the the CES is you’re licking each others’ wounds and devaluating the prestige of being in the CES. Do yourselves a huge favor, and teach your kids to give credit where credit is due! The kids who made it to the CES deserve to be praised and uplifted instead of being doubted! To make up stories like some parents pulled strings to get their kids in is just plain stupid!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My older daughter is very smart, but didn't get into CES either. However, we plan to do our own version of CES at home. There are plenty of home schooling resources available that meet or even exceed what CES teaches. As much as it may be bragging rights, CES doesn't really matter in the long run. Kids can still take AP classes in high school, skip grades if they can test out of the material, etc... Also, there are plenty of coding and robotics camps during the summer, lots and lots of educational toys at a reasonable cost (e.g., robotics kits, game programming tutorials).
The only real difference that I see between CES and non-CES students is that enrichment comes from parents for the latter kids.
If your kid got in, would you still have made the statement that CES doesn’t matter in the long run? The problem with most of you whose kids didn’t get into the the CES is you’re licking each others’ wounds and devaluating the prestige of being in the CES. Do yourselves a huge favor, and teach your kids to give credit where credit is due! The kids who made it to the CES deserve to be praised and uplifted instead of being doubted! To make up stories like some parents pulled strings to get their kids in is just plain stupid!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My older daughter is very smart, but didn't get into CES either. However, we plan to do our own version of CES at home. There are plenty of home schooling resources available that meet or even exceed what CES teaches. As much as it may be bragging rights, CES doesn't really matter in the long run. Kids can still take AP classes in high school, skip grades if they can test out of the material, etc... Also, there are plenty of coding and robotics camps during the summer, lots and lots of educational toys at a reasonable cost (e.g., robotics kits, game programming tutorials).
The only real difference that I see between CES and non-CES students is that enrichment comes from parents for the latter kids.
If your kid got in, would you still have made the statement that CES doesn’t matter in the long run? The problem with most of you whose kids didn’t get into the the CES is you’re licking each others’ wounds and devaluating the prestige of being in the CES. Do yourselves a huge favor, and teach your kids to give credit where credit is due! The kids who made it to the CES deserve to be praised and uplifted instead of being doubted! To make up stories like some parents pulled strings to get their kids in is just plain stupid!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP if you're already fretting about your child's college prospects when he is in 3rd grade, you need a psychiatric intervention. Your child will do just fine in a regular classroom. And if he doesn't I'm sure you can just bribe a fencing coach or find some other way to ensure his giftedness finds an appropriate educational reward.
Seriously, get over the CES nonsense. Very few children are so off-the-charts brilliant that they are going to be profoundly disserved by being in a classroom amongst a wide range of their peers.
Oh please! No need to be nasty. School sends you a letter saying your child is picked to be tested for something and then says no he is not eligible. Of course I am disappointed. But that's why it is good to hear from the parents who have responded. Helped me get over this faster than if I was worrying about it alone! Thanks
Anonymous wrote:My kid is a high performer in his school (which has very smart kids in general). His MAP scores and grades are great (all As and 99 percentile). He says he is quite bored with the 3rd grade material so I was hoping he would make it into CES but he didn't. We didn't send him to any prep classes - did get him one of those COGAT books to work on and he seemed to do great. But now I am regretting not helping him prep further - I am really conflicted about it because on the one hand, I know some kids who are smart but not really gifted but did a lot of prep and got in. On the other hand, maybe prepping them to get in defeats the purpose of CES!
The question I have is how do you get your kids in local school to be competitive in middle and high school if there is such a gap in instruction right from grade 4 between them and the CES kids. I keep reading on these boards how much work the 5th grade kids do in CES --- can some of the parents whose kids didn't make it to CES but got into magnets in middle/high school and/or got into top colleges comment?
I am actually surprised I am feeling bad about this but it may be because my kid is feeling some sting of the rejection.
Anonymous wrote:My older daughter is very smart, but didn't get into CES either. However, we plan to do our own version of CES at home. There are plenty of home schooling resources available that meet or even exceed what CES teaches. As much as it may be bragging rights, CES doesn't really matter in the long run. Kids can still take AP classes in high school, skip grades if they can test out of the material, etc... Also, there are plenty of coding and robotics camps during the summer, lots and lots of educational toys at a reasonable cost (e.g., robotics kits, game programming tutorials).
The only real difference that I see between CES and non-CES students is that enrichment comes from parents for the latter kids.
Anonymous wrote:Test orientation is important for sure. A friend told me that her kid got 6% MCPS and 40's% National, and was shocked about those numbers when receiving the letter. The kid got all A's and MAP's at 85%tile. She was very concerned not because her kid did not get in, but something went wrong with her. I am very sympathetic and not sure how to help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP tried gaming the system. Now he/she regretted that he/she did not do enough. What a joke!
+1. You nailed it.
Buying one COGAT prep book is considered gaming the system? Are you people nuts? Do you also consider the kid who takes musical instrument lessons and gets picked for the orchestra or the kid who takes soccer/tennis lessons and gets picked for the team as gaming the system? Because only kids who have never prepared or trained should be considered to identify the truly gifted tennis player?
To be fair, MCPS shall provide every student a COGAT prep book.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP tried gaming the system. Now he/she regretted that he/she did not do enough. What a joke!
+1. You nailed it.
Buying one COGAT prep book is considered gaming the system? Are you people nuts? Do you also consider the kid who takes musical instrument lessons and gets picked for the orchestra or the kid who takes soccer/tennis lessons and gets picked for the team as gaming the system? Because only kids who have never prepared or trained should be considered to identify the truly gifted tennis player?
To be fair, MCPS shall provide every student a COGAT prep book.