Anonymous wrote:The part about not being a people pleaser and his inability to complete work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not a gifted program anymore.
Teacher remarks should have the most weight. Is the child advanced? Hard working? Curious? Bright? That is the child for AAP.
But test scores are objective. Teachers can be great or terrible; burnt out, disinterested, brand new, like or dislike a certain kind of kid, etc etc.
If a parent disagrees with the teacher’s assessment of their child they may appeal with more evidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not a gifted program anymore.
Teacher remarks should have the most weight. Is the child advanced? Hard working? Curious? Bright? That is the child for AAP.
That's ridiculous, though. My child's 2nd grade teacher didn't like him because he's not a people pleaser and wasn't compliant with the mounds of busy work they were given, like coloring sheets, word searches, and the like. DS was in the outlier math, reading, and word study groups (like, top 2-3 kids in the grade), with his teachers in those glowing about how advanced and brilliant he is. DS was reading long chapter books in 1st grade. DS also had all test scores above 140. The 2nd grade teacher gave a GBRS of 11, with only a 1 in Motivation to Succeed. Most of the comments were pretty lame, and he was dinged for preferring to engage with adults rather than other kids and for being disorganized. Yes, the teacher put negative comments in the GBRS, even though all comments are supposed to be positive. He still was admitted to AAP.
In AAP, he's the kid winning all of the contests, acing all of the tests, and to some extent making the other AAP kids in his class feel dumb. My other AAP child, who is a bright, hardworking, non-gifted people-pleaser, got a 16 GBRS. The GBRS is much more reflective of the teacher's biases than the kid's actual ability.
Not that he couldn’t do well in AAP but he didn’t sound like a good candidate from what you’ve written about his behavior. On the other hand he does seem advanced. Obviously he got in, so what exactly are you claiming? That he wouldn’t have?
Anonymous wrote:I think the test scores should be used for the pool selection and the teachers' observations/recommendations of the students should play a crucial part in the final selection round. I have often heard from my older child's AAP teachers that a lot of the kids in the AAP program should not belong there and these kids end up at bottom of their classes. I don't know if all the prepping helps to boost up the scores slightly or not but I would think there is some truth to it. If my children did not get into the AAP, I would have been fine with the decision. There are more to success beyond just academic alone. Be happy for their strong self confidence, good ethics and well grounded circles of friends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not a gifted program anymore.
Teacher remarks should have the most weight. Is the child advanced? Hard working? Curious? Bright? That is the child for AAP.
That's ridiculous, though. My child's 2nd grade teacher didn't like him because he's not a people pleaser and wasn't compliant with the mounds of busy work they were given, like coloring sheets, word searches, and the like. DS was in the outlier math, reading, and word study groups (like, top 2-3 kids in the grade), with his teachers in those glowing about how advanced and brilliant he is. DS was reading long chapter books in 1st grade. DS also had all test scores above 140. The 2nd grade teacher gave a GBRS of 11, with only a 1 in Motivation to Succeed. Most of the comments were pretty lame, and he was dinged for preferring to engage with adults rather than other kids and for being disorganized. Yes, the teacher put negative comments in the GBRS, even though all comments are supposed to be positive. He still was admitted to AAP.
In AAP, he's the kid winning all of the contests, acing all of the tests, and to some extent making the other AAP kids in his class feel dumb. My other AAP child, who is a bright, hardworking, non-gifted people-pleaser, got a 16 GBRS. The GBRS is much more reflective of the teacher's biases than the kid's actual ability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not a gifted program anymore.
Teacher remarks should have the most weight. Is the child advanced? Hard working? Curious? Bright? That is the child for AAP.
That's ridiculous, though. My child's 2nd grade teacher didn't like him because he's not a people pleaser and wasn't compliant with the mounds of busy work they were given, like coloring sheets, word searches, and the like. DS was in the outlier math, reading, and word study groups (like, top 2-3 kids in the grade), with his teachers in those glowing about how advanced and brilliant he is. DS was reading long chapter books in 1st grade. DS also had all test scores above 140. The 2nd grade teacher gave a GBRS of 11, with only a 1 in Motivation to Succeed. Most of the comments were pretty lame, and he was dinged for preferring to engage with adults rather than other kids and for being disorganized. Yes, the teacher put negative comments in the GBRS, even though all comments are supposed to be positive. He still was admitted to AAP.
In AAP, he's the kid winning all of the contests, acing all of the tests, and to some extent making the other AAP kids in his class feel dumb. My other AAP child, who is a bright, hardworking, non-gifted people-pleaser, got a 16 GBRS. The GBRS is much more reflective of the teacher's biases than the kid's actual ability.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not a gifted program anymore.
Teacher remarks should have the most weight. Is the child advanced? Hard working? Curious? Bright? That is the child for AAP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How did you appeal? with WISC scores and samples? If samples also, how many did you provide? Also what was your child's WISC score? Thanks
The appeal was just with a letter and 5 work samples. We didn't do a WISC. I doubt the new materials were necessarily that persuasive, but rather the appeals committee thought that my child shouldn't have been rejected in the first place. The appeals committee will not be the same people who rejected your child the first time around, and they will look at the entire file, old stuff+ new stuff.
Anonymous wrote:
How did you appeal? with WISC scores and samples? If samples also, how many did you provide? Also what was your child's WISC score? Thanks
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not a gifted program anymore.
Teacher remarks should have the most weight. Is the child advanced? Hard working? Curious? Bright? That is the child for AAP.
From someone who had one kid with a 15 gbrs and one with a 16: the gbrs should carry a lot of weight but I could definitely see how kids could fall through the cracks and not get the gbrs deserved. I previously taught and know that during the local committee meetings, we boosted gbrs as high as legitimately possible for kids with lower scores who truly stood out as gifted. So if a kid with a 120 cogat was considered, wed give a very high gbrs bc he belonged in aap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Genuinely curious who is on this committee?
Files are screened by AARTs from all over the county. Every file has at least 2 readers.
So one AART votes yes or no, and then a second one confirms that?
If the work samples are the most important part of the file, they should let people know and make them mandatory. Since the test scores are required and everything else is optional, reasonable parents conclude that test scores, reading level, report cards are the information the decision is based on.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not a gifted program anymore.
Teacher remarks should have the most weight. Is the child advanced? Hard working? Curious? Bright? That is the child for AAP.