Anonymous wrote:Interesting observation, OP! I agree with you.
To me “starter home” has a connotation that you’ll be moving on to bigger and better things, and that the home is somehow lacking. It’s okay only if you are young and will eventually have more, is the implication.
“First-time homebuyer” is different. It means only that you haven’t bought before. It doesn’t say anything about the quality of the home or imply that you are expected to upgrade from it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A condo or townhouse is a starter home in the DC area.
Not true. I know people who have been in their TH for more than 20 years with no plans of moving.
Anonymous wrote:I laughed when my realtor made a comment about a "starter home" I was buying that was around a half million. I laughed at him, and then gave him a very bad review. I found it so insulting. And bizarre since I was nearly 40 and single.
Anonymous wrote:A condo or townhouse is a starter home in the DC area.
Anonymous wrote:I laughed when my realtor made a comment about a "starter home" I was buying that was around a half million. I laughed at him, and then gave him a very bad review. I found it so insulting. And bizarre since I was nearly 40 and single.
Single 40 year olds usually aren't buying small houses. They stay in condos or maybe a row house. I didn't get married and decide to have kids until I was late 30s. If I had stayed single into my 40s I would have never switched from a large condo to a SFH. Too much maintenance and hassle for just one person to deal with and without kids why on earth buy a SFH?
I laughed when my realtor made a comment about a "starter home" I was buying that was around a half million. I laughed at him, and then gave him a very bad review. I found it so insulting. And bizarre since I was nearly 40 and single.
Anonymous wrote:I laughed when my realtor made a comment about a "starter home" I was buying that was around a half million. I laughed at him, and then gave him a very bad review. I found it so insulting. And bizarre since I was nearly 40 and single.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This isn't "insulting". What's insulting is you projecting onto others what should and shouldn't be the ideal long-term house just because you didn't buy a bigger house.
Huh? Seems like people who use the term "starter" in a listing are projecting onto buyers what their long term goals should be even if they're buying small right now.
If a 1000 square foot house in silver spring is your long term goal, you have serious self esteem issues.
Those of us without them will continue to aim high
I know, right? If only schoolteachers would show a little more self-esteem, maybe they could convince the kiddos to pony up and help them buy a bigger house! Maybe firefighters should have the confidence to negotiate more money from people while their houses are mid-burn. Aim high, after all!
Not everyone is trying to maximize their income, nor their square footage, and a lot of those people are doing the rest of us huge favors. Maybe we could be a little more sympathetic?
You skipped the police and the nurses. Is there no one to think of the martyred middle class![]()
Most of us here have careers to provide us with nice lifestyles, and the ones who don't make very much still want nice lifestyles
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This isn't "insulting". What's insulting is you projecting onto others what should and shouldn't be the ideal long-term house just because you didn't buy a bigger house.
Huh? Seems like people who use the term "starter" in a listing are projecting onto buyers what their long term goals should be even if they're buying small right now.
If a 1000 square foot house in silver spring is your long term goal, you have serious self esteem issues.
Those of us without them will continue to aim high
I know, right? If only schoolteachers would show a little more self-esteem, maybe they could convince the kiddos to pony up and help them buy a bigger house! Maybe firefighters should have the confidence to negotiate more money from people while their houses are mid-burn. Aim high, after all!
Not everyone is trying to maximize their income, nor their square footage, and a lot of those people are doing the rest of us huge favors. Maybe we could be a little more sympathetic?
Anonymous wrote:Take this one, for example. Described as a starter home in the listing:
https://www.redfin.com/MD/Silver-Spring/632-Mississippi-Ave-20910/home/10953314
Maybe the listing agent wants to appeal to buyers who'd prefer some larger with more than one bathroom, but calling it a "starter" at $575,000 is insulting. I hate the idea that, even if it's a financial reach to spend that much, we should see at as a compromise relative to a house that costs even more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This isn't "insulting". What's insulting is you projecting onto others what should and shouldn't be the ideal long-term house just because you didn't buy a bigger house.
Huh? Seems like people who use the term "starter" in a listing are projecting onto buyers what their long term goals should be even if they're buying small right now.
If a 1000 square foot house in silver spring is your long term goal, you have serious self esteem issues.
Those of us without them will continue to aim high