Anonymous wrote:What's the point of it? You pretty much have to assume that every kid has gotten some kind of help or advise on it, even if just from a parent. Why put so much weight on something that there is absolutely no way to tell, how much help was received?
Anonymous wrote:The essay is a simple way to remove cheaters. It can be pretty obvious when someone else writes it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who says they put a lot of weight on it?
Why not also toss out GPA (maybe they had a tutor) or SAT/ACT scores because they may have prepped?
Admissions departments aren't grading them the way a teacher would, they are looking to see what the student can reveal about him or herself or how they think.
If your essay was slapped together quickly, with or without help, it will show.
? You're aware of the Papa John's pizza essay that got the girl into Yale? It is often a tie-breaker at more selective schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Or, they could use technology to figure out the likelihood that it is the same person that wrote it. You would need something that wasn’t manipulated, like in theory SAT essay or original work the school submitted on behalf of the student.
The essay is important to get a sense of who someone is beyond the numbers, how they would contribute to the school community, and perhaps how much they know about your school and why they think it would be a good fit for them. It also the chance for the student to advocate for themselves.[/quote]
Yes, in theory the essay would be a good tool for getting a sense of this, but sense there is no way of knowing whether the ideas came from the student or someone else, why bother?
In my son's school, the essay is weighted very heavily. They really want to know what makes the kid tick...look beyond the grades and test scores. Honestly, I wouldn't want my kid to attend a school that didn't care who he was. But that's just me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would be glad for the essays to go. It is just a big exercise in projecting and parroting back what one thinks admissions wants to hear. It also bugs me that the woe-is-me-type-essay seems to do so well.
If that's what you think the essays are, then you are doing them wrong. I'm sure that what the admissions officers read is 99% (yes, I made that statistic up) this type of drivel and 1% authentic writing. The woe-is-me essay may bug you, but some kids have actually overcome serious obstacles. If those problems also appear in teacher and counselor recommendations then they are real. Not everyone is as privileged as you. Essays don't stand alone, they are part of the whole student package. Admission decisions are not made or broken based on one metric, but the essay can help a student stand out if it catches the admissions officer's eye.
I've attended my share of college information sessions and listened to admissions officers do their spiels. I distinctly remember one at an elite institution that was very well done. If you were paying attention, the officer had three layers to her story (the main points she wanted to share, the story she wrapped it in, and the humorous thread in the story). I have no doubt that if you picked up the humorous thread and wove it into your own essay, she would notice it and notice you.
Selective institutions could toss out the entire group they admitted and admit a different but equally talented group from the remaining students (MIT admin has said this.) A good essay just helps you end up in the first group.
Anonymous wrote:I would be glad for the essays to go. It is just a big exercise in projecting and parroting back what one thinks admissions wants to hear. It also bugs me that the woe-is-me-type-essay seems to do so well.