Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lottery--seriously. A certain percentage of the incoming class is offered admission by lottery.
I actually really agree with this. Have an internal scoring criteria that puts the most weight on grades and test scores, secondary weighting on extracurriculars/work experience/volunteering, tertiary weighting on recommendations/URM. Any student that meets a minimum scoring threshold gets their name put in the lottery. The university randomly picks students via the lottery who would be capable of completing the work.
That said, I think even this would succumb to corruption. People are so invested in gaming the system. But a random lottery among those who meet the minimum qualifications would be "fairer" than the process today.
The lottery problem is that schools can’t guaruntee their desired racial balance - unless they did multiple lotteries of separate pools separated by race - which would open up a huge can of worms.
Yes - that's the only problem with a lottery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We should educate everybody.
Education should not be a culling process.
Get rid of SAT/ACT.
Some people really don't need college/won't succeed in college.
Anonymous wrote:If I could wave a magic wand ...
1) Eliminate activities as a consideration. Do not even have it as an option on the Common or Coalition App -- no preferences for athletes, ballet stars, musical prodigies, marching band members, debaters etc.
Schools can offer these activities to anyone in the freshman class who tries out for them, like high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lottery--seriously. A certain percentage of the incoming class is offered admission by lottery.
I actually really agree with this. Have an internal scoring criteria that puts the most weight on grades and test scores, secondary weighting on extracurriculars/work experience/volunteering, tertiary weighting on recommendations/URM. Any student that meets a minimum scoring threshold gets their name put in the lottery. The university randomly picks students via the lottery who would be capable of completing the work.
That said, I think even this would succumb to corruption. People are so invested in gaming the system. But a random lottery among those who meet the minimum qualifications would be "fairer" than the process today.
The lottery problem is that schools can’t guaruntee their desired racial balance - unless they did multiple lotteries of separate pools separated by race - which would open up a huge can of worms.
Anonymous wrote:Every GPA in the country should be based off the 100 point model. Get rid of weighted courses and get rid of magnet schools. Give each school curriculum options and let the kids decide which courses they want as long as they take one math, one english, one science, one social studies, and one elective each year. Max classes is 6.
One practice test for ACT and one for SAT in Spring of sophomore year.
One test in both ACT and SAT in junior year Spring, taken at the school during a school day, 2 weeks apart. They can account for each student. No retakes are allowed. You can decide which of the two scores to submit.
Seniors should be given a 3 hour window to write their general essay in school on paper. Counselors co-sign for authenticity and upload them into their system and send them out as needed. If a college needs specific essays they must be done on high school grounds. Each school allots a 2 hour window once a week. It is hand written and co-signed by the proctor.
EC's that you can put down on a college app are maxed out at 5. Make them count.
You must apply to each school individually. App prices should be lowered or at least on a sliding scale. Under $50K a year - free. $50-100K a year - $25. $100K or higher $50.
Applications should be given numbers. Admissions should never know the name of the student. They also should not know their FAFSA/CSS until a decision has been made. A separate committee makes up the aid packages based on a scale of how bad the school wants that student. High, Average, Low.
Coaches have to give a full page report on each individual they want to recruit. All D1 athletic recruits need to do an interview at the school or have someone from admissions go to their house for the interview.
Anonymous wrote:What is surprising is the fact that it’s supposedly a $25 million scam. It’s so much more than that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, a lot of you want to eliminate quantifiers?
Not sure how mixing a pool of students could work that way. The top tier would be frustrated and pulled down, the lower tier would be frustrated and not able to keep up.
Students should be measured with what they can do without being overly prepped.
Entrance exams should go back to being one and done. When did all of this change for the worse?
I have friends that tell me that they would not (supposedly, not sure if they are just being humble, could be) be admitted to their top tier university these days, because there are too many applicants. When there are too many (best of the best) students, and not enough slots, therein lies one of the many problems.
I thought I read that many college's are struggling for students? I guess those are just the non-top-tier schools? What I don't understand is all the foreign students we allow in. For example, why would we ever allow Chinese students to come to America, use our university, then go home? It makes absolutely no sense unless there are empty slots that don't have domestic applicants. China has 4 times our population, they need to build 4 times as many colleges instead of depending on America for everything. Same goes for European students. Why don't they have a bigger system?
Anonymous wrote:The people in this thread must be the same people who worry the handful of people out of our population of 350 million who commit voter fraud. Until I see some numbers showing that cheating is higher than about 10%, it is not cost effective to try to reduce it.
Anonymous wrote:So, a lot of you want to eliminate quantifiers?
Not sure how mixing a pool of students could work that way. The top tier would be frustrated and pulled down, the lower tier would be frustrated and not able to keep up.
Students should be measured with what they can do without being overly prepped.
Entrance exams should go back to being one and done. When did all of this change for the worse?
I have friends that tell me that they would not (supposedly, not sure if they are just being humble, could be) be admitted to their top tier university these days, because there are too many applicants. When there are too many (best of the best) students, and not enough slots, therein lies one of the many problems.
Anonymous wrote:Ditch the SATs, the essay and the extracurricular stuff.
Have entrance exam that test subject matter knowledge. There will not a be single student in the USA who can score 100% on all of them.
Combine that score with the GPA and take the top x students. Done!