Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work for a Fortune 500 and you couldn’t pay me enough to be CEO. Their entire life and that of their family is completely dominated by work. To get to that level you are wholly owned by the company. If they want to live that life go for it. They should be compensated. And the pp who said it is mostly stock is correct.
I completely agree. I’m in senior level management and feel like my life revolves around work- but it is absolutely nothing compared to what my CEO deals with. He deserves whatever he is paid to handle the crap he handles
This just sounds so out-of-touch with lower income families where parents work several jobs just to make ends meet. A Fortune 500 CEO can quit at 40 and his grand kids can still be set with all the dividends.
Anonymous wrote:Why does anyone deserve to make $19MM per year??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work for a Fortune 500 and you couldn’t pay me enough to be CEO. Their entire life and that of their family is completely dominated by work. To get to that level you are wholly owned by the company. If they want to live that life go for it. They should be compensated. And the pp who said it is mostly stock is correct.
I completely agree. I’m in senior level management and feel like my life revolves around work- but it is absolutely nothing compared to what my CEO deals with. He deserves whatever he is paid to handle the crap he handles
Anonymous wrote:Wages for CEO’s have accelerated and Compared to wages earned by regular workers, it has gone up much faster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does anyone deserve to make $19MM per year??
No one deserves any salary. One works their butt off to the top. Big decision makers reap big rewards.
That’s not how it works. They all sit on each other’s boards and vote themselves high salary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s say you make 50k a year and your boss makes 100k a year. In 10 years you make 65k a year and he makes 3.5 million dollars a year. That’s what happened to CEO pay in relation to employee wages.
Blue cross has $30B in revenues and $1.5B in profit. There aren't people lined up down the street who can manage that company and if you think there are then I am wasting my time typing this. You get paid what your investors think you are worth. If those investors felt for one second that the $5M guy could do the same job with no risk to the company they would make that move in a second. $19M is a drop in the bucket against that revenue number.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s say you make 50k a year and your boss makes 100k a year. In 10 years you make 65k a year and he makes 3.5 million dollars a year. That’s what happened to CEO pay in relation to employee wages.
Blue cross has $30B in revenues and $1.5B in profit. There aren't people lined up down the street who can manage that company and if you think there are then I am wasting my time typing this. You get paid what your investors think you are worth. If those investors felt for one second that the $5M guy could do the same job with no risk to the company they would make that move in a second. $19M is a drop in the bucket against that revenue number.
Anonymous wrote:Does the CEO have to pay a copay of 20% to collect? I sure have to when accessing covered BCBS services.
Anonymous wrote:Let’s say you make 50k a year and your boss makes 100k a year. In 10 years you make 65k a year and he makes 3.5 million dollars a year. That’s what happened to CEO pay in relation to employee wages.
Anonymous wrote:If the police can be free of charge, healthcare can be free of charge. The entire economic system is a rigged scam. It's all presented as unthinkable as an intentional form of enslavement. If the building of an F-35 warplane can be free of charge, healthcare can be free of charge. Everything the elite want is free of charge. What the people want is too expensive, and more deeply, it's not even thinkable. If the elite want it, they will get it. If you want it, be patient for 400 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They hate rich people.
I AM a rich person. Between me and my DH, we are bringing home $200k/year and despite what folks on DCUM might sometimes say it is a shitload of money and more than I ever expected to make in my lifetime.
If we made $180k, we'd be fine. If we collectively made $100k, we wouldn't live like we live now but we'd also be fine. We've been there before.
I resent the fact that my boss and my boss's boss and so on are basically skimming off what I make to enrich themselves further. I'm sure they put in longer hours than I do but no one needs to make upwards of $3 million (what the head of my company makes).
you can walk at any time. Ask for a raise put up or shutup lol idiot
200k a year is not rich
yes, it is. Look it up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let’s say you make 50k a year and your boss makes 100k a year. In 10 years you make 65k a year and he makes 3.5 million dollars a year. That’s what happened to CEO pay in relation to employee wages.
Still doesn’t change the fact that if he made zero dollars, the savings wouldn’t be there for that number of customers. Even if he made just $250k, the savings per customer would only be $3 and some change. Even if none of the top executives made any money, and let’s say the company saved 1 billion, the customer would only be saving about $4.50. Would you notice or care about $4.50? What if nobody at all made any salary at BC, and you saved $15. Would you be happy? You wouldn’t even notice!
But you know who WOULD notice? All the underpaid peons at Blue Cross. Lower his pay to something less insane and give them a nice raise. And get me a better price on freakin Epipens!
Seriously. Look at what’s happening with the prices for epipens, insulin, Humera. People are literally dying for lack of access to drugs, and the people at the top of the healthcare industry are raking in money. This is a problem. This is not right.
Then the issue seems to be government regulation.
The pitchforks are coming.
I don't think Medicare for all is financially feasible, but with stuff like this the person who wins the democratic nomination will have to support it.