FPYCparent wrote:Maybe I'm wrong, but I think many readers jumped to the conclusion that the club invited the guest players to improve their chances of winning … in a tournament at the 2008/U11 level. OP, did you really get the feeling that the club was seeking wins? Did this team ultimately get the wins (whether or not the guest players provided some advantage)? Could this have been nothing more than exposing those guest players to our (ha!) soccer culture? (No, I'm not trying to imply that our current culture is a good thing!)
As a 2008/U11 parent, what is more concerning to me is that the benched GK hasn't been playing other positions all along. I think it's great that that he wants to play GK at this age, but I think many may agree that this age is too young to focus exclusively on a single position. My 2008/U11 plays GK, but she may barely play an entire half of a game there. There are 5 girls on a roster of 15/16 that are getting additional GK training and our coach distributes playing time at all positions evenly regardless of outcomes. If training and playing time at other/all positions isn't already happening, then I believe that would be a more significant reason for leaving the current club.
There is no silver lining to what the club/team did to this player. Especially if significant travel expenses were a part of the trip. This kid is not joining this team and it is disrespectful to your own players.