Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate the term redshirt when used in this context. This isn’t about playing a college sport. It’s about developmental appropriate expectations in kindergarten and your child’s readiness.
I did however send my August birthday girl to kindergarten when she was 6, not 5. I’ve taught kindergarten for nearly 20 years, it was an easy choice. She is now in middle school and I’m even happier with my choice than I was when she was 5/6.
I'm interested in this. What about your experience as a kindergarten teacher made it an easy choice, and what benefits have you seen now that she is in middle school?
It was an easy choice because I know that 5 year old children are not developmentally ready for what kindergarten requires
Of them now. They are not meant to spend their days doing worksheets and drilling sight words or phonics or addition and subtraction facts with one adult to 25 small beings. They are meant to be free to explore their world with support and guidance. They need attention paid to their social emotional development. I knew that would not be my daughter’s experience in kindergarten and I chose to give her an extra year to grow. Not so that she could be better than the other kids but so that she could have a better, more meaningful experience and be more able to cope with the transition to the real world of big school.
As for the long term benefits, she is more emotionally mature than her friends. She is able to stay out of the drama and is a wonderful friend. She is a natural leader. Is some of this her natural personality? Probably. But I do believe that the year before going to kindergarten helped her grow into the person she is.
Anonymous wrote:You have your ages wrong. An August birthday will only ever be 18 in high school, even if red shirted. They won't turn 19 until after college has started the next fall. They will be a 19 yo college freshman.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it’s not a clear-cut decision to hold a boy back! At most, it should be a clear-cut YES to send a girl on time and maybe slightly less clear for a boy, but only slightly. This is getting ridiculous. The only kids I knew who waited were girl twins that only barely made the cutoff (but wouldn’t have if they’d been born at term) and had mild SN. And a boy with an even earlier birthday that just “didn’t seem ready”— but that mom completely regretted holding him back.
That's a huge gender bias. I know I wouldn't want my child to be a 19 year old senior for the entire year dating 17-18 year old girls. You don't know what kids will be like later on so its a huge guessing game but most kids will rise to the challenge.
No one has come up with anything except maturity, despite paying for private testing last summer. A lot of this stuff also dies down in a more preschool-like environment. She wasn't ready for so much sitting.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We sent our DD with a Labor Day birthday on time. It's been a tough K year. By chance, she ended up as the youngest in her class by 2 months. More than half of her class was 6 by Christmas, but she's not even 5.5 yet. She's a head shorter than most of the class and visibly younger.
She was in the principal's office every other day for the first month of school. She's still on a behavior plan. She does fine academically and during normal classroom work, but struggles with impulse control and transitions. She can't seem to keep her body to herself when Iining up. She's out classed socially on the playground and tends to get in trouble for doing annoying things, like continuing to chase someone after they've asked her to stop. And she doesn't fit in in the lunchroom, as she hasn't yet figured out how to do small talk. She tends to end up poking a neighbor or wiggling and falling out of her chair. It's all little stuff, but it adds up. I think she'd probably fit in better in a pre-k class for young 5s.
It will be interesting to see if her K teacher thinks she should move on to 1st. She's fine academically and during structured activities, but really struggles with transitions and unstructured time. A 1st grade teacher is going to have much less patience for the maturity stuff. By sending her on time I often feel like I've created a behavior problem out of a kid who would have been very successful if we just happened to live somewhere with Sept 1 cutoff.
That isn't fully normal for a 5 year old and maybe something else more is gong on?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We sent our DD with a Labor Day birthday on time. It's been a tough K year. By chance, she ended up as the youngest in her class by 2 months. More than half of her class was 6 by Christmas, but she's not even 5.5 yet. She's a head shorter than most of the class and visibly younger.
She was in the principal's office every other day for the first month of school. She's still on a behavior plan. She does fine academically and during normal classroom work, but struggles with impulse control and transitions. She can't seem to keep her body to herself when Iining up. She's out classed socially on the playground and tends to get in trouble for doing annoying things, like continuing to chase someone after they've asked her to stop. And she doesn't fit in in the lunchroom, as she hasn't yet figured out how to do small talk. She tends to end up poking a neighbor or wiggling and falling out of her chair. It's all little stuff, but it adds up. I think she'd probably fit in better in a pre-k class for young 5s.
It will be interesting to see if her K teacher thinks she should move on to 1st. She's fine academically and during structured activities, but really struggles with transitions and unstructured time. A 1st grade teacher is going to have much less patience for the maturity stuff. By sending her on time I often feel like I've created a behavior problem out of a kid who would have been very successful if we just happened to live somewhere with Sept 1 cutoff.
That isn't fully normal for a 5 year old and maybe something else more is gong on?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate the term redshirt when used in this context. This isn’t about playing a college sport. It’s about developmental appropriate expectations in kindergarten and your child’s readiness.
I did however send my August birthday girl to kindergarten when she was 6, not 5. I’ve taught kindergarten for nearly 20 years, it was an easy choice. She is now in middle school and I’m even happier with my choice than I was when she was 5/6.
I'm interested in this. What about your experience as a kindergarten teacher made it an easy choice, and what benefits have you seen now that she is in middle school?
You have your ages wrong. An August birthday will only ever be 18 in high school, even if red shirted. They won't turn 19 until after college has started the next fall. They will be a 19 yo college freshman.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, it’s not a clear-cut decision to hold a boy back! At most, it should be a clear-cut YES to send a girl on time and maybe slightly less clear for a boy, but only slightly. This is getting ridiculous. The only kids I knew who waited were girl twins that only barely made the cutoff (but wouldn’t have if they’d been born at term) and had mild SN. And a boy with an even earlier birthday that just “didn’t seem ready”— but that mom completely regretted holding him back.
That's a huge gender bias. I know I wouldn't want my child to be a 19 year old senior for the entire year dating 17-18 year old girls. You don't know what kids will be like later on so its a huge guessing game but most kids will rise to the challenge.
Anonymous wrote:We sent our DD with a Labor Day birthday on time. It's been a tough K year. By chance, she ended up as the youngest in her class by 2 months. More than half of her class was 6 by Christmas, but she's not even 5.5 yet. She's a head shorter than most of the class and visibly younger.
She was in the principal's office every other day for the first month of school. She's still on a behavior plan. She does fine academically and during normal classroom work, but struggles with impulse control and transitions. She can't seem to keep her body to herself when Iining up. She's out classed socially on the playground and tends to get in trouble for doing annoying things, like continuing to chase someone after they've asked her to stop. And she doesn't fit in in the lunchroom, as she hasn't yet figured out how to do small talk. She tends to end up poking a neighbor or wiggling and falling out of her chair. It's all little stuff, but it adds up. I think she'd probably fit in better in a pre-k class for young 5s.
It will be interesting to see if her K teacher thinks she should move on to 1st. She's fine academically and during structured activities, but really struggles with transitions and unstructured time. A 1st grade teacher is going to have much less patience for the maturity stuff. By sending her on time I often feel like I've created a behavior problem out of a kid who would have been very successful if we just happened to live somewhere with Sept 1 cutoff.
Anonymous wrote:OP, it’s not a clear-cut decision to hold a boy back! At most, it should be a clear-cut YES to send a girl on time and maybe slightly less clear for a boy, but only slightly. This is getting ridiculous. The only kids I knew who waited were girl twins that only barely made the cutoff (but wouldn’t have if they’d been born at term) and had mild SN. And a boy with an even earlier birthday that just “didn’t seem ready”— but that mom completely regretted holding him back.