Anonymous wrote:It is a terrible mistake to get bogged down in these test scores, either thinking your kid is, in fact, "only" average or that the test is wrong about your child. I made that mistake for our "only" average IQ kid, and it warped my thinking for years. In fact, my child, as yours, is a unique individual with unique strengths and weaknesses and a set of interests and motivations that cannot possibly be captured by one test on one day of their life. It may matter to "big 3" schools, but it shouldn't matter to you. I wish I would have taken that advice when my child was younger. Our DC is actually gifted in the arts, and the test never caught that or measured it. And DC does extremely well in school. What more could I want? I am an Ivy League grad, and I am glad my parents never subjected me to an IQ test and then confined me to its results, either to accept the results or care so much about them that they pushed back against the results. On the other hand, if the results show real weaknesses indicative of a learning disability like low processing speed, that can help you to see where your child may need support or accommodations to reach their potential. But to get bogged down about average scores is a mistake that I wish I had never made. I couldn't even see the child in front of me; just the deficits that are, for all practical purposes, invisible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thank you all so much. I’ve been struggling with this. But all your own stories of your kids in similar situations, and your reassurances, make this much easier to handle. I need to accept that in the grand scheme of things, a test on an 8-year-old won’t determine her entire future.
Thank you again.
Not to dash your hopes but yeah, it's pretty likely that your child is just going to fall in the very average range. There are so many kids with your child's profile and scores and processing speed isn't really fixable. There are some things that can hep improve it slightly but if you were thinking straight A's all the time with no effort that's not going to happen. Once the homework load picks up, you will see the impact of processing speed. Slower reader of more in depth texts and books so it might take several hours to get through a chapter. It can take much longer to write an essay. and so on.
I disagree with the suggestion that a low processing speed score for a young kid will mean slow reading and comprehension. My DC scored in the 37th percentile on processing speed as a little kid, but is a natural speed reader who scored in the 99th percentile on the SSAT reading section with no prep (missed one question). DC writes slow, but types fast. All is well in high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thank you for all the replies. DC scored in the average range for IQ (104), but low average for working memory (91) and high-average for GAI (116). All the other scores were average. I feel silly complaining about average scores, but DC has always excelled in school, which makes me wonder about the discrepency. We are also applying to some very competitive schools, and I don’t want DC’s chances to be jeopardized...
I thought I was going to score 1600 on the SATs when I took them, then I was floored when I received my scores... When I took the MCATs, I was looking at 15’s on all subjects but wasn’t even close after seeing the results. Sometimes, we all think we are smarter than the person next to us but in the end we’re all “just” average. I am still very successful and live in Bethesda with two kids in private schools that I’m paying over 40k for with no financial aid. I live in a 3m house, went to public schools all my life, even public college yet I am where I am today as a successful doctor. We all do what is best for our kids but sometimes “being average” is good enough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are NOT allowed to retake for at least another year
Who doesn't allow you to do it? Who do you think is stopping people? There is no law that prevents it and there is no tracking system. Of course, one can have their child tested again. Just pick a different tester, pay the fee and take the test.
Yes. We did that after a 6 months interval. If you do your research on the WISC-V and talk to WISC-V research scientists (not the teachers who know nothing and simply parrot what they've been told, and obviously not the psychologist you are paying!), you will find that the gain your child can make if he repeats the test after a few months is insignificant. IQ tests are designed to be prep-proof - they do not test knowledge, but the way your brain works. While that may not be 100% accurate, it largely works that way.
In one of her later posts OP refers to the kid as she.
I assume when you took your DC to the examiner, they already asked where to send the scores. If you informed them of the places you are applying to already, I am sure those test scores are sent. It will be weird to have another examiner send ANOTHER set of test scores if you do decide to RETAKE the exam. Not only will this raise a RED flag with admissions, they will assume you are desperate. Not a good idea to retake just because of "average" scores.
By the way, why do all PP assume the OP is talking about their DD. I read all the OP's post and clearly it says DC...which does not mean DD(female)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are NOT allowed to retake for at least another year
Who doesn't allow you to do it? Who do you think is stopping people? There is no law that prevents it and there is no tracking system. Of course, one can have their child tested again. Just pick a different tester, pay the fee and take the test.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thank you for all the replies. DC scored in the average range for IQ (104), but low average for working memory (91) and high-average for GAI (116). All the other scores were average. I feel silly complaining about average scores, but DC has always excelled in school, which makes me wonder about the discrepency. We are also applying to some very competitive schools, and I don’t want DC’s chances to be jeopardized...
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thank you for all the replies. DC scored in the average range for IQ (104), but low average for working memory (91) and high-average for GAI (116). All the other scores were average. I feel silly complaining about average scores, but DC has always excelled in school, which makes me wonder about the discrepency. We are also applying to some very competitive schools, and I don’t want DC’s chances to be jeopardized...
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thank you for all the replies. DC scored in the average range for IQ (104), but low average for working memory (91) and high-average for GAI (116). All the other scores were average. I feel silly complaining about average scores, but DC has always excelled in school, which makes me wonder about the discrepency. We are also applying to some very competitive schools, and I don’t want DC’s chances to be jeopardized...