Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP was asking for good academics too. STJ is just mediocre.
Holton or Potomac are the best academic schools that also have good sports teams.
As well as GDS and NCS
GDS is not as strong academically as Holton, NCS, or Potomac. And to say it's athletic is hilarious. Really. It's a great school, with very very liberal kids--but not strong athletes. I even know of several girls who left there for another school because of how bad the athletics are.
Seriously?!? GDS is much stronger academically than Potomac or Holton. It is as rigorous as Sidwell and NCS/STA.
GDS is not the equal of Sidwell, STA or NCS. It is equal to Potomac and Holton however. And the later three are only a little bit less intense than the first three.
Well, you are wrong. Based not just on college placement, but on things like NMSF numbers. Sidwell has 14 this year. GDS is second in DC with 11. STA has 7. NCS has 4. Potomac has 2. Holton has ? Well, I cannot find anything beyond Holton bragging about 10 commended students. Someone did an analysis on tis very board this fall showing percentages:
Sidwell 10.4%
St. Albans 7.7%
GDS 5.7%
NCS 4.4%
Holton 3.6%
Heights 3.2%
St. Anselm's 3.2%
Potomac 2.5%
Maret 2.5%
Walls 2.4%
McLean (VA) 2.4%
Visitation 1.9%
WIS 1.5%
GtownPrep 1.2%
Gonzaga 1.1%
Wash-Lee 1.1%
Yorktown 0.8%
Stone Ridge 0.7%
St. John's 0.6%
Fine, but National Merit is academics only and has nothing to do with sports. OP asked about a mix, so if you want to talk college placement and sports, the local conversation starts and ends with NCS Crew. In the last three years alone, NCS Crew has sent at least 3 rowers to UVa, 3 to Princeton, 2 to Stanford, 2 to Brown, 2 to Dartmouth, and at least one to MIT, UChicago, Wesleyan, Penn, Cornell, Yale, and Texas.
Fine, but this particular sub-thread was about academics only. So while you are correct about the lack of athletic stardom at GDS, it is clearly academically superior to Potomac and Holton and on a par with SFS, STA and NCS.
What about girls lacrosse at SSSAS? Are they no longer dominant? It used to be that all their most impressive college matriculations were girls lax stars when Joan Holden was head, and that's only what - 5 years ago?
One reason that Visi is able to field strong teams in the larger team sports is their larger student population relative to the other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP was asking for good academics too. STJ is just mediocre.
Holton or Potomac are the best academic schools that also have good sports teams.
As well as GDS and NCS
GDS is not as strong academically as Holton, NCS, or Potomac. And to say it's athletic is hilarious. Really. It's a great school, with very very liberal kids--but not strong athletes. I even know of several girls who left there for another school because of how bad the athletics are.
Seriously?!? GDS is much stronger academically than Potomac or Holton. It is as rigorous as Sidwell and NCS/STA.
GDS is not the equal of Sidwell, STA or NCS. It is equal to Potomac and Holton however. And the later three are only a little bit less intense than the first three.
Well, you are wrong. Based not just on college placement, but on things like NMSF numbers. Sidwell has 14 this year. GDS is second in DC with 11. STA has 7. NCS has 4. Potomac has 2. Holton has ? Well, I cannot find anything beyond Holton bragging about 10 commended students. Someone did an analysis on tis very board this fall showing percentages:
Sidwell 10.4%
St. Albans 7.7%
GDS 5.7%
NCS 4.4%
Holton 3.6%
Heights 3.2%
St. Anselm's 3.2%
Potomac 2.5%
Maret 2.5%
Walls 2.4%
McLean (VA) 2.4%
Visitation 1.9%
WIS 1.5%
GtownPrep 1.2%
Gonzaga 1.1%
Wash-Lee 1.1%
Yorktown 0.8%
Stone Ridge 0.7%
St. John's 0.6%
Fine, but National Merit is academics only and has nothing to do with sports. OP asked about a mix, so if you want to talk college placement and sports, the local conversation starts and ends with NCS Crew. In the last three years alone, NCS Crew has sent at least 3 rowers to UVa, 3 to Princeton, 2 to Stanford, 2 to Brown, 2 to Dartmouth, and at least one to MIT, UChicago, Wesleyan, Penn, Cornell, Yale, and Texas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP was asking for good academics too. STJ is just mediocre.
Holton or Potomac are the best academic schools that also have good sports teams.
As well as GDS and NCS
GDS is not as strong academically as Holton, NCS, or Potomac. And to say it's athletic is hilarious. Really. It's a great school, with very very liberal kids--but not strong athletes. I even know of several girls who left there for another school because of how bad the athletics are.
Seriously?!? GDS is much stronger academically than Potomac or Holton. It is as rigorous as Sidwell and NCS/STA.
GDS is not the equal of Sidwell, STA or NCS. It is equal to Potomac and Holton however. And the later three are only a little bit less intense than the first three.
Well, you are wrong. Based not just on college placement, but on things like NMSF numbers. Sidwell has 14 this year. GDS is second in DC with 11. STA has 7. NCS has 4. Potomac has 2. Holton has ? Well, I cannot find anything beyond Holton bragging about 10 commended students. Someone did an analysis on tis very board this fall showing percentages:
Sidwell 10.4%
St. Albans 7.7%
GDS 5.7%
NCS 4.4%
Holton 3.6%
Heights 3.2%
St. Anselm's 3.2%
Potomac 2.5%
Maret 2.5%
Walls 2.4%
McLean (VA) 2.4%
Visitation 1.9%
WIS 1.5%
GtownPrep 1.2%
Gonzaga 1.1%
Wash-Lee 1.1%
Yorktown 0.8%
Stone Ridge 0.7%
St. John's 0.6%
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP was asking for good academics too. STJ is just mediocre.
Holton or Potomac are the best academic schools that also have good sports teams.
As well as GDS and NCS
GDS is not as strong academically as Holton, NCS, or Potomac. And to say it's athletic is hilarious. Really. It's a great school, with very very liberal kids--but not strong athletes. I even know of several girls who left there for another school because of how bad the athletics are.
Seriously?!? GDS is much stronger academically than Potomac or Holton. It is as rigorous as Sidwell and NCS/STA.
GDS is not the equal of Sidwell, STA or NCS. It is equal to Potomac and Holton however. And the later three are only a little bit less intense than the first three.
Anonymous wrote:Holton and NCS would be the best for girls academics w/ good sports. FWIW mine was recruited to Ivy from Holton for her sport. She also had friends recruited for sport from NCS. GDS sucks at sports and SJ is not as good academically. Visi would be ok and so would SR. (but not quite as good academically as NCS/Holton).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Visi parents, what's the issue with your volleyball program? Is it coaching? Are girls choosing other schools with stronger teams? Do travel volleyball teams funnel kids into certain schools as basketball and lax clubs? It seems odd since volleyball is currently a popular sport with MS girls and Visi's other teams seem to be thriving.
It’s pretty bad, I don’t think they won a set all season...and it’s not like the ISL is strong. Can’t fault the kids effort though - they try hard.
I am not a Visi parent and don't know about their program but I have a daughter who attends a school in the WCAC and plays volleyball. To address your questions, I believe the answers are yes. Many of the girls who play for the top teams in the WCAC like Holy Cross, Paul VI and SJC play club volleyball and are on travel teams. I would assume Visi is not investing in volleyball in terms of recruiting talent and capable coaches. So, if your girl plays competitive volleyball and wants the opportunity to play with skilled players, then Visi is not the school for the sport of volleyball.
Flint Hill is leaps and bounds the best HS volleyball team of any private school in the DC area.
True.
Is that why other schools don't try? I've heard has had strong teams in the past which is interesting because the rest of their athletics are a joke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NCS is slightly better academically but no where near as good athletically. I mean come on. Most sports stink at NCS. They tend to have only one standout athlete per grade. None of the teams in any sport do anything beyond playing in the ISL and a top girl athlete who is smart enough to go to NCS is giving up playing on an outstanding high school team which few want to do.
It's the best crew program in the region. Won the top two prizes at Stotesbury the past three years in a row. That has had an impact on the entire program. A lot of girls who would be strong contributors in other sports choose instead to devote the year to rowing.
I have kids on the close. Yes, NCS has an amazing rowing team but your statement that it takes top athletes away from other sports is just not true. Crew is a Spring sport. The top lax players still play lax (and there is only 1 per grade) they don't row crew. Only other main sport NCS has in Spring is track and field. Crew is an awesome endeavor and a huge boost for admission to a top academic school if you are great (I am not knocking crew in any way here) but its doesn't draw from the same athletic pool as other sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Visi parents, what's the issue with your volleyball program? Is it coaching? Are girls choosing other schools with stronger teams? Do travel volleyball teams funnel kids into certain schools as basketball and lax clubs? It seems odd since volleyball is currently a popular sport with MS girls and Visi's other teams seem to be thriving.
It’s pretty bad, I don’t think they won a set all season...and it’s not like the ISL is strong. Can’t fault the kids effort though - they try hard.
I am not a Visi parent and don't know about their program but I have a daughter who attends a school in the WCAC and plays volleyball. To address your questions, I believe the answers are yes. Many of the girls who play for the top teams in the WCAC like Holy Cross, Paul VI and SJC play club volleyball and are on travel teams. I would assume Visi is not investing in volleyball in terms of recruiting talent and capable coaches. So, if your girl plays competitive volleyball and wants the opportunity to play with skilled players, then Visi is not the school for the sport of volleyball.
Flint Hill is leaps and bounds the best HS volleyball team of any private school in the DC area.
True.
Is that why other schools don't try? I've heard has had strong teams in the past which is interesting because the rest of their athletics are a joke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Visi parents, what's the issue with your volleyball program? Is it coaching? Are girls choosing other schools with stronger teams? Do travel volleyball teams funnel kids into certain schools as basketball and lax clubs? It seems odd since volleyball is currently a popular sport with MS girls and Visi's other teams seem to be thriving.
It’s pretty bad, I don’t think they won a set all season...and it’s not like the ISL is strong. Can’t fault the kids effort though - they try hard.
I am not a Visi parent and don't know about their program but I have a daughter who attends a school in the WCAC and plays volleyball. To address your questions, I believe the answers are yes. Many of the girls who play for the top teams in the WCAC like Holy Cross, Paul VI and SJC play club volleyball and are on travel teams. I would assume Visi is not investing in volleyball in terms of recruiting talent and capable coaches. So, if your girl plays competitive volleyball and wants the opportunity to play with skilled players, then Visi is not the school for the sport of volleyball.
Flint Hill is leaps and bounds the best HS volleyball team of any private school in the DC area.
True.