Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There's only one bridge, with 4 lanes each way, between MoCo and VA. That hardly seems like a lot to connect two areas each with over 1 million population.
The ICC (MD-200) opened 7 years ago. I hear few complaints that it's overcrowded and we need to expand it.
In fact, the ICC would be part of an outer beltway and second bridge crossing. VA already has done most of their part -- it's VA-28 near Dulles. We just need less than 10 miles from that end of VA-28 to the start of 370/MD-200 to complete it. However, MoCo will staunchly oppose it because it would enter a tiny sliver of the Agricultural Reserve at one corner of it.
The outer beltway and second bridge crossing are transportation planning from the 1950s. It's 2018. How about some 2018 ideas?
A "tiny sliver of the Agricultural Reserve" -- lol.
As long as the nations capital and every national attraction is on the md side of the bridge then why should md build another bridge?
Md even owns the river.
1/2 of an Amazon field office is not prestigious.
Yep
To hear Nova folks talking, you would think that Amazon is the great savior, the second coming of Christ.
I guess anything to give them a boost, make them relevant is good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There's only one bridge, with 4 lanes each way, between MoCo and VA. That hardly seems like a lot to connect two areas each with over 1 million population.
The ICC (MD-200) opened 7 years ago. I hear few complaints that it's overcrowded and we need to expand it.
In fact, the ICC would be part of an outer beltway and second bridge crossing. VA already has done most of their part -- it's VA-28 near Dulles. We just need less than 10 miles from that end of VA-28 to the start of 370/MD-200 to complete it. However, MoCo will staunchly oppose it because it would enter a tiny sliver of the Agricultural Reserve at one corner of it.
The outer beltway and second bridge crossing are transportation planning from the 1950s. It's 2018. How about some 2018 ideas?
A "tiny sliver of the Agricultural Reserve" -- lol.
As long as the nations capital and every national attraction is on the md side of the bridge then why should md build another bridge?
Md even owns the river.
1/2 of an Amazon field office is not prestigious.
Yep
To hear Nova folks talking, you would think that Amazon is the great savior, the second coming of Christ.
I guess anything to give them a boost, make them relevant is good.
Anonymous wrote:People keep saying this, but in some ways CC was just a better choice in that it had existing empty buildings with a Metro stop. White Flint had a big plot of land miles from the nearest public transit.
Which...great for Crystal City but there was very little MoCo could do about that.
Anonymous wrote:
Crown Farm is in GAITHERSBURG. So I guess that example is useless, since you claim Gaithersburg isn't in the county.
As for the commute from Clarksburg to NOVA, you're absolutely right. Had a friend that did it and was miserable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You're being pedantic. The developers can't build new housing without the county's approval, so yes, the county is *allowing* lots of new housing, and the new development is not all near metro. Have you seen the new builds in Clarksburg and Gaithersburg. They are not near metro stops.
We need either a new bridge or a new train going over 270 down to Nova. There's no point in just adding bus services since those buses would end up sitting in traffic along with the rest of the drivers.
The new housing in Gaithersburg is in Gaithersburg, which is not the county. (You're not going to say that's pedantic, is it?) Are you referring to Crown Farm, which is hypothetically transit-oriented based on the unbuilt Corridor Cities Transitway? Or Parklands at Watkins Mill, which is next to the Metropolitan Grove MARC station?
The new housing in Clarksburg was approved in 1994. Also, if you work in northern Virginia and move to Clarksburg, or you moved to Clarksburg and then take a new job where you work in northern Virginia - well, that's a lousy life, but it's not a good reason to build you a new bridge to drive yourself on.
If you want to spend big money to improve mobility, then the MARC Brunswick Line, BRT in dedicated lanes on MD 355 all the way to Clarksburg, and the Corridor Cities Transitway are better investments.
Crown Farm is in GAITHERSBURG. So I guess that example is useless, since you claim Gaithersburg isn't in the county.
As for the commute from Clarksburg to NOVA, you're absolutely right. Had a friend that did it and was miserable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You're being pedantic. The developers can't build new housing without the county's approval, so yes, the county is *allowing* lots of new housing, and the new development is not all near metro. Have you seen the new builds in Clarksburg and Gaithersburg. They are not near metro stops.
We need either a new bridge or a new train going over 270 down to Nova. There's no point in just adding bus services since those buses would end up sitting in traffic along with the rest of the drivers.
The new housing in Gaithersburg is in Gaithersburg, which is not the county. (You're not going to say that's pedantic, is it?) Are you referring to Crown Farm, which is hypothetically transit-oriented based on the unbuilt Corridor Cities Transitway? Or Parklands at Watkins Mill, which is next to the Metropolitan Grove MARC station?
The new housing in Clarksburg was approved in 1994. Also, if you work in northern Virginia and move to Clarksburg, or you moved to Clarksburg and then take a new job where you work in northern Virginia - well, that's a lousy life, but it's not a good reason to build you a new bridge to drive yourself on.
If you want to spend big money to improve mobility, then the MARC Brunswick Line, BRT in dedicated lanes on MD 355 all the way to Clarksburg, and the Corridor Cities Transitway are better investments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There's only one bridge, with 4 lanes each way, between MoCo and VA. That hardly seems like a lot to connect two areas each with over 1 million population.
The ICC (MD-200) opened 7 years ago. I hear few complaints that it's overcrowded and we need to expand it.
In fact, the ICC would be part of an outer beltway and second bridge crossing. VA already has done most of their part -- it's VA-28 near Dulles. We just need less than 10 miles from that end of VA-28 to the start of 370/MD-200 to complete it. However, MoCo will staunchly oppose it because it would enter a tiny sliver of the Agricultural Reserve at one corner of it.
The outer beltway and second bridge crossing are transportation planning from the 1950s. It's 2018. How about some 2018 ideas?
A "tiny sliver of the Agricultural Reserve" -- lol.
As long as the nations capital and every national attraction is on the md side of the bridge then why should md build another bridge?
Md even owns the river.
1/2 of an Amazon field office is not prestigious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There's only one bridge, with 4 lanes each way, between MoCo and VA. That hardly seems like a lot to connect two areas each with over 1 million population.
The ICC (MD-200) opened 7 years ago. I hear few complaints that it's overcrowded and we need to expand it.
In fact, the ICC would be part of an outer beltway and second bridge crossing. VA already has done most of their part -- it's VA-28 near Dulles. We just need less than 10 miles from that end of VA-28 to the start of 370/MD-200 to complete it. However, MoCo will staunchly oppose it because it would enter a tiny sliver of the Agricultural Reserve at one corner of it.
The outer beltway and second bridge crossing are transportation planning from the 1950s. It's 2018. How about some 2018 ideas?
A "tiny sliver of the Agricultural Reserve" -- lol.
As long as the nations capital and every national attraction is on the md side of the bridge then why should md build another bridge?
Md even owns the river.
1/2 of an Amazon field office is not prestigious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because there is an enormous amount of commerce and travel between MD and VA every day. It benefits both states to make it easier to move people and goods between them. The demand is there -- look at how busy the current bridge is.
That's an argument for better mobility. It's not an argument for a second bridge.
again with the "mobility". What does that mean? More public transport. Buses won't help. They'd be stuck on the bridge with everyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because there is an enormous amount of commerce and travel between MD and VA every day. It benefits both states to make it easier to move people and goods between them. The demand is there -- look at how busy the current bridge is.
That's an argument for better mobility. It's not an argument for a second bridge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Because there is an enormous amount of commerce and travel between MD and VA every day. It benefits both states to make it easier to move people and goods between them. The demand is there -- look at how busy the current bridge is.
That's an argument for better mobility. It's not an argument for a second bridge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There's only one bridge, with 4 lanes each way, between MoCo and VA. That hardly seems like a lot to connect two areas each with over 1 million population.
The ICC (MD-200) opened 7 years ago. I hear few complaints that it's overcrowded and we need to expand it.
In fact, the ICC would be part of an outer beltway and second bridge crossing. VA already has done most of their part -- it's VA-28 near Dulles. We just need less than 10 miles from that end of VA-28 to the start of 370/MD-200 to complete it. However, MoCo will staunchly oppose it because it would enter a tiny sliver of the Agricultural Reserve at one corner of it.
The outer beltway and second bridge crossing are transportation planning from the 1950s. It's 2018. How about some 2018 ideas?
A "tiny sliver of the Agricultural Reserve" -- lol.
As long as the nations capital and every national attraction is on the md side of the bridge then why should md build another bridge?
Md even owns the river.
1/2 of an Amazon field office is not prestigious.
Because there is an enormous amount of commerce and travel between MD and VA every day. It benefits both states to make it easier to move people and goods between them. The demand is there -- look at how busy the current bridge is.
Anonymous wrote:
Because there is an enormous amount of commerce and travel between MD and VA every day. It benefits both states to make it easier to move people and goods between them. The demand is there -- look at how busy the current bridge is.