Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:11v11 fields at Muldoon’s were only 98 long x 56 wide, and used cheap portable goals. Complete joke, given the quality of teams there in the 06 age group.
We're talking U13s? Come on...we're really getting nit-picky here.
Muldoons has some fields that are on a noticeable incline so when you are going one way you have a ton of unexpected speed, and when you kick the ball the other way, it rolls 'uphill'. Dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If one pays $2 for a candy bar, they expect a decent candy bar for it. If a team pays $1000+ for a soccer tournament, the should expect a decent soccer field condition, with regular sized field dimensions and goals. Not too much to ask for.
Talk about comparing apples to oranges...or candy bars to soccer tournaments.
I’ve been in youth soccer a long time, and when I go to a tournament, I hope for the best and expect the worst. Normally you end up in the middle.
Lots of things wrong with this tourney, some preventable, some not.
Some things worth complaining about, some not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If one pays $2 for a candy bar, they expect a decent candy bar for it. If a team pays $1000+ for a soccer tournament, the should expect a decent soccer field condition, with regular sized field dimensions and goals. Not too much to ask for.
Talk about comparing apples to oranges...or candy bars to soccer tournaments.
I’ve been in youth soccer a long time, and when I go to a tournament, I hope for the best and expect the worst. Normally you end up in the middle.
Lots of things wrong with this tourney, some preventable, some not.
Some things worth complaining about, some not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:11v11 fields at Muldoon’s were only 98 long x 56 wide, and used cheap portable goals. Complete joke, given the quality of teams there in the 06 age group.
We're talking U13s? Come on...we're really getting nit-picky here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This the tournament where they charge 1200-1400 to sign up a single team right?
For older AGs, yes. But the older AGs also get the better fields. I'm not a defender of the club or the tournament, but the tournament does have a pretty good college recruiting presence so the bang for the buck in terms of exposure may be "worth it" for some older teams. The younger teams pay $800-$1000 for a bad experience on terrible fields, so it is hard for me to understand any reason to do that other than collecting/maximizing Got Soccer points (and for ULittle, why?).
I'm PP above who said the club needs to figure out its prioritize and realign the tournament, and this illustrates that point.
Also, to echo something someone said earlier on this thread or the other one, I do feel bad for all the club parents who volunteer so much time and energy for a tournament that leaves so many people feeling ripped off. The problems with the tournament are not a reflection of their efforts at all.
Does it really though? I just looked through the college coach list for the girls and don't see a lot of powerhouse schools on it.
Anonymous wrote:If one pays $2 for a candy bar, they expect a decent candy bar for it. If a team pays $1000+ for a soccer tournament, the should expect a decent soccer field condition, with regular sized field dimensions and goals. Not too much to ask for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The premiere girls lacrosse tournaments have been cancelled in all or part the past three weeks, each was sponsored by a different entity and involved a large number of out of state teams, and college coaches. Bethesda soccer may be horrible, but the weather has caused havoc to more than just their tournament this month.
But you said it yourself...those tournaments were cancelled.
If I was a local, I’d rather play as much as possible, even if it’s a day or two.
If I’m from out of town, I’d rather the Tournament was cancelled.
They should think long and hard about what to do this coming weekend if the forcast is correct.
Anonymous wrote:The premiere girls lacrosse tournaments have been cancelled in all or part the past three weeks, each was sponsored by a different entity and involved a large number of out of state teams, and college coaches. Bethesda soccer may be horrible, but the weather has caused havoc to more than just their tournament this month.
Anonymous wrote:11v11 fields at Muldoon’s were only 98 long x 56 wide, and used cheap portable goals. Complete joke, given the quality of teams there in the 06 age group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This the tournament where they charge 1200-1400 to sign up a single team right?
For older AGs, yes. But the older AGs also get the better fields. I'm not a defender of the club or the tournament, but the tournament does have a pretty good college recruiting presence so the bang for the buck in terms of exposure may be "worth it" for some older teams. The younger teams pay $800-$1000 for a bad experience on terrible fields, so it is hard for me to understand any reason to do that other than collecting/maximizing Got Soccer points (and for ULittle, why?).
I'm PP above who said the club needs to figure out its prioritize and realign the tournament, and this illustrates that point.
Also, to echo something someone said earlier on this thread or the other one, I do feel bad for all the club parents who volunteer so much time and energy for a tournament that leaves so many people feeling ripped off. The problems with the tournament are not a reflection of their efforts at all.
Does it really though? I just looked through the college coach list for the girls and don't see a lot of powerhouse schools on it.