Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearst is changing a lot. They can't even accommodate all the OOB kids with siblings anymore in PK. It's becoming much, much more IB and much less diverse. From my perspective, that's a loss to the school (though obviously not anyone's fault).
Diversity is nice but if I had to choose, I’ll take rising academic quality.
Changing demographic does not mean academic quality goes up.
I know a number of OOB families at Hearst. The mothers have graduate degrees, and are often better educated than the law firm partner's wives who live IB.
So this creates diversity exactly how?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearst is changing a lot. They can't even accommodate all the OOB kids with siblings anymore in PK. It's becoming much, much more IB and much less diverse. From my perspective, that's a loss to the school (though obviously not anyone's fault).
Diversity is nice but if I had to choose, I’ll take rising academic quality.
Changing demographic does not mean academic quality goes up.
I know a number of OOB families at Hearst. The mothers have graduate degrees, and are often better educated than the law firm partner's wives who live IB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearst is changing a lot. They can't even accommodate all the OOB kids with siblings anymore in PK. It's becoming much, much more IB and much less diverse. From my perspective, that's a loss to the school (though obviously not anyone's fault).
Diversity is nice but if I had to choose, I’ll take rising academic quality.
Changing demographic does not mean academic quality goes up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearst is changing a lot. They can't even accommodate all the OOB kids with siblings anymore in PK. It's becoming much, much more IB and much less diverse. From my perspective, that's a loss to the school (though obviously not anyone's fault).
Diversity is nice but if I had to choose, I’ll take rising academic quality.
Changing demographic does not mean academic quality goes up.
I know a number of OOB families at Hearst. The mothers have graduate degrees, and are often better educated than the law firm partner's wives who live IB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearst is changing a lot. They can't even accommodate all the OOB kids with siblings anymore in PK. It's becoming much, much more IB and much less diverse. From my perspective, that's a loss to the school (though obviously not anyone's fault).
Diversity is nice but if I had to choose, I’ll take rising academic quality.
Changing demographic does not mean academic quality goes up.
I know a number of OOB families at Hearst. The mothers have graduate degrees, and are often better educated than the law firm partner's wives who live IB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearst is changing a lot. They can't even accommodate all the OOB kids with siblings anymore in PK. It's becoming much, much more IB and much less diverse. From my perspective, that's a loss to the school (though obviously not anyone's fault).
Diversity is nice but if I had to choose, I’ll take rising academic quality.
Changing demographic does not mean academic quality goes up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hearst is changing a lot. They can't even accommodate all the OOB kids with siblings anymore in PK. It's becoming much, much more IB and much less diverse. From my perspective, that's a loss to the school (though obviously not anyone's fault).
Diversity is nice but if I had to choose, I’ll take rising academic quality.
Anonymous wrote:Hearst is changing a lot. They can't even accommodate all the OOB kids with siblings anymore in PK. It's becoming much, much more IB and much less diverse. From my perspective, that's a loss to the school (though obviously not anyone's fault).
Anonymous wrote:What are differentiators if any between Hearst and John Eaton? We are renting in area and would consider both.