Anonymous wrote:When buying a new vehicle, you never get a just introduced model. Wait a couple years until they get the problems worked out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least it's not an Audi or RR.
Totally different class of cars. Cadillacs are all under 100k. The cheapest RR start at over 300k.
I'm pretty sure the only way you could spend $300,000 on a Range Rover is if you bought two (or maybe even three) of them.
RR = Rolls Royce
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Buick is the very definition of reliable (with the glaring exception of the enclave which is prob what most younger parents are familiar with). I have owned 3 Buick’s over the last 30 years - all fantastic. Not great exterior design, but definitely reliable, comfortable and low maintenance.
This station wagon looks great, tho. I saw it on the road a few days ago and did s double-take.
I've been seeing a lot of Mercedes E wagons recently. I don't get the appeal of station wagons at all, but it's a nice looking car.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least it's not an Audi or RR.
Totally different class of cars. Cadillacs are all under 100k. The cheapest RR start at over 300k.
I'm pretty sure the only way you could spend $300,000 on a Range Rover is if you bought two (or maybe even three) of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least it's not an Audi or RR.
Totally different class of cars. Cadillacs are all under 100k. The cheapest RR start at over 300k.
Anonymous wrote:Big vulgar cars for big vulgar people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Buick is the very definition of reliable (with the glaring exception of the enclave which is prob what most younger parents are familiar with). I have owned 3 Buick’s over the last 30 years - all fantastic. Not great exterior design, but definitely reliable, comfortable and low maintenance.
This station wagon looks great, tho. I saw it on the road a few days ago and did s double-take.
I've been seeing a lot of Mercedes E wagons recently. I don't get the appeal of station wagons at all, but it's a nice looking car.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cadillac has one of the worst reputations of all car manufacturers. You will be massively overpaying, and I would not keep it more than 3 years.
Why would you buy it if you wouldn’t keep it more than 3 years??
I wouldn't, I'd lease.
Anonymous wrote:Buick is the very definition of reliable (with the glaring exception of the enclave which is prob what most younger parents are familiar with). I have owned 3 Buick’s over the last 30 years - all fantastic. Not great exterior design, but definitely reliable, comfortable and low maintenance.
This station wagon looks great, tho. I saw it on the road a few days ago and did s double-take.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cadillac has one of the worst reputations of all car manufacturers. You will be massively overpaying, and I would not keep it more than 3 years.
Why would you buy it if you wouldn’t keep it more than 3 years??
Anonymous wrote:Cadillac has one of the worst reputations of all car manufacturers. You will be massively overpaying, and I would not keep it more than 3 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least it's not an Audi or RR.
Totally different class of cars. Cadillacs are all under 100k. The cheapest RR start at over 300k.