Anonymous wrote:OP, I get it: you have one kid who has a passion that you want to encourage. I totally get that and think it's a good thing for a parent to do. And you want this kid to develop a sense of responsibility, which will require him to have some skin in the game.
Here's the plan I would suggest for both kids:
1. Mom pays for equipment, entry fees, etc. for the important passions. If one kid needs a $3000 cello and one needs a $300 pair of ice skates, fine. That's an example of fair not always meaning equal.
2. Mom provides the necessities for both kids, e.g., the necessary amount of money on a metro card to get to and from school and activities (try signing up for auto-reload), food in the house for each kid to pack his own lunch (or not), reasonable clothing, etc.
3. Mom provides an allowance to each kid, either monthly or weekly, in an amount sufficient to cover a reasonable amount of extra activities. This means eating out with friends, homecoming, social events, etc. You give this to both kids, without being asked. If kid #2 wants to bank his, fine. If kid #1 spends all his, fine. It's theirs to choose. But make sure you give it to both kids, and have the same expectations for both of them with regard to its use.
4. Mom does not provide ad hoc funds (e.g., "Do you need money for that movie?"). The kids budget for themselves, though you can help guide them in decision-making. If one runs out because he spent it all on pizza and can't go to the movie, fine. That's the learning experience.
5. If kid loses any of the necessary items Mom has provided, kid pays for that out of his own money. If he can't afford a movie because he had to buy a new metro card, again, fine. That's the learning process.
6. In urgent cases (kid lost metro card, doesn't have any money to replace it), Mom advances the cost from the next month's allowance - with a meaningful amount of interest, like 10%. No working it off. Mom also follows through by subtracting the correct amount next month.
This way, both kids have what they need, both kids have the opportunity to learn budgeting and responsibility, and both kids are treated fairly.
The kid may have to learn a painful lesson once or twice with this approach, and it will be your job not to bail him out, no matter how compelling the activities (e.g., if he spends all his money, he might not get to go to homecoming). Better he have a little hurt now and learn responsibility, than have big hurts later because he hasn't.
Anonymous wrote:Wow! Thank you 14:43! You get it and this is very practical straightforward advice!!
Of course easier said than done but I'm going to try the budgeting again.
Anonymous wrote:Wow! Thank you 14:43! You get it and this is very practical straightforward advice!!
Of course easier said than done but I'm going to try the budgeting again.
Anonymous wrote:I'm raising two teens on one income. It's a nice income and I feel lucky, but there are financial stresses especially since one of my teens does a somewhat pricey activity. This teen also likes nice things and likes to spend $ eating out with friends. Unfortunately, this teen's activity prevents him from having a summer job so he is not able to earn money for extras (unlike his sibling who worked all summer for spending money).
So I buy him nice clothes, pay for things like homecoming, social activities, phone chargers etc. I don't mind doing this BUT here are the problems:
1. He loses things a lot (a metro card, his wallet, a $20) and wastes things (lunches come home uneaten)
2. He promises to work off money he borrows from me but then does not do the work or I have to harass him to do it
3. I try to be sympathetic and supportive but then I get fed up and stressed out. I freak out and he refuses to communicate. It's a horrible cycle.
I want to teach him to manage his money and I know I'm doing it all wrong. I also don't want him to suffer bc he's being raised by a single parent. And I don't want our relationship to suffer.
I am so stressed over money right now and I need him to take responsibility!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op Here. Thanks for those who have *nicely* offered advice and perspective.
I'm not sure why everyone is hung up on my other child. To clarify, I do spend money and expend resources fairly equally between the two. However they have different needs. I'm not going to buy the one a football every time I buy his brother one (for example only) when that is not is activity.
To the poster who wondered how a child could *possibly* not NEED a car, lots of people don't drive. In fact, in my older teen's circle, many kids are choosing not to even get their licenses because they don't need them. Public transportation FTW!
To everyone who likes to play the DCUM guessing game + predictions of doom (musical instrument+snark I'm looking at you), get another hobby. It's not helpful.
Anyway, thanks again for the advice and commiseration. Yes! Therapy! I'm in it. He's in it. Hopefully it will help in the long run.![]()
OP, I don't think you really came here for advice but to unburden your soul, vent a little etc. I hope that this thread has enabled you to do that. I very much doubt that you will even heed the *nicely* offered advice and perspective. Good luck with your choices.
Anonymous wrote:Give both teens a comparable weekly or monthly allowance that allows them to pay for a reasonable amount of "nice clothes,...things like homecoming, social activities, phone chargers" etc.
Both teens have the opportunity now to do things that will benefit their own lives in the future. Teen who works should be able to save that money (if desired) to save, invest, pay for future car, etc. Teen who doesn't work has an expensive hobby that could parlay into an income later. But it is his choice not to work now and save his money. He shouldn't be coddled, and his sibling shouldn't be penalized for working.
Benefits of a clear allowance, which can be used to make a budget:
1. He will learn to lose things less and waste things less. (I wouldn't ride him too heard about the lunch, because he could always just throw it out at school so you'll stop nagging. But why is he not eating it--is it because he's buying junk at school? If he keeps doing that, that's a financial choice he'll be making with his own money.
2. You won't be lending him extra money, so you won't have to hassle him about repaying it or working it off. He wants phone charger? He can save for it or put it on his Christmas list. There's nothing he needs now that requires loans.
3. You remove the emotion from the money. You don't need to vacillate between being supportive and being frustrated. Instead, you can be supportive 100% of the time. "Oh, you spent all your money for the week and can't attend a movie with your friends? That sucks. Feel free to invite your friends over to watch a movie here instead."
Anonymous wrote:Op Here. Thanks for those who have *nicely* offered advice and perspective.
I'm not sure why everyone is hung up on my other child. To clarify, I do spend money and expend resources fairly equally between the two. However they have different needs. I'm not going to buy the one a football every time I buy his brother one (for example only) when that is not is activity.
To the poster who wondered how a child could *possibly* not NEED a car, lots of people don't drive. In fact, in my older teen's circle, many kids are choosing not to even get their licenses because they don't need them. Public transportation FTW!
To everyone who likes to play the DCUM guessing game + predictions of doom (musical instrument+snark I'm looking at you), get another hobby. It's not helpful.
Anyway, thanks again for the advice and commiseration. Yes! Therapy! I'm in it. He's in it. Hopefully it will help in the long run.![]()